B-166173: Apr 22, 1969

IT IS YOUR CONTENTION THAT IN OUR DECISION WE WERE MISTAKEN AS TO THE THICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE SURFACE TO BE CUT. YOU STATE THAT "NOWHERE IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE WE ABLE TO FIND A STATEMENT THAT THE PAVEMENT TO BE CUT AND REMOVED WOULD BE ONE INCH.'. IN YOUR APRIL 9 LETTER YOU FURTHER RELATE: "* * * IT IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR AN OWNER TO HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE AS TO THE THICKNESS OF PAVEMENT T...

B-166173: Apr 01, 1969

INC: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR TELEGRAM AND LETTER OF FEBRUARY 12. WAS ISSUED ON DECEMBER 11. PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS WERE ADVISED THAT SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER BIDDING DATA AND INFORMATION WERE AVAILABLE ON APPLICATION AND THAT BIDS WERE TO BE OPENED AT 2:30 P.M. BIDS WERE OPENED ON THE APPROPRIATE DATE AND YOUR FIRM SUBMITTED THE LOW BID OF $270. CONTACTED THE SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION OF NAVFAC TO ADVI...