B-163744:
Apr 26, 1968
MITCHELL AND BIXLER: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR TELEGRAM OF MARCH 21. THAT SAID BID WAS NOT RESPONSIVE TO THE TERMS OF THE INVITATION. BECAUSE THE TWO BIDS WERE INTERRELATED SEGMENTS OF ONE PROCUREMENT. THE PROTEST WAS DENIED ON THIS BASIS. IN YOUR CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE A NUMBER OF ARGUMENTS ARE ADVANCED IN SUPPORT OF YOUR ALLEGATION THAT OUR DECISION WAS IN ERROR. THESE CONTENTIONS ARE FIRST QUOT...