B-160591: Nov 22, 1967

A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE VALIDITY OF A SECOND MARRIAGE IS REQUIRED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE JURISDICTION WHERE THE MARRIAGE IS PERFORMED. IF ONE OF THE PARTIES WAS DOMICILED IN THAT STATE. THE ROSENSTIEL CASE NO LONGER WILL BE VIEWED AS CONSTITUTING A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE VALIDITY OF A MEXICAN DIVORCE. 1967: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 28. THE QUESTIONS AND CIRCUM...

B-160591: Feb 17, 1967

NAVY REGIONAL FINANCE CENTER: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 23. WAS ASSIGNED SUBMISSION NO. WERE MARRIED IN 1960 AND THAT SHE OBTAINED A MEXICAN DIVORCE IN 1966. "IS HEREBY DECLARED DISSOLVED.'. THE QUESTION PRESENTED IS WHETHER LIEUTENANT NABORS IS TO BE REGARDED AS HAVING A LAWFUL WIFE BEGINNING JUNE 18. THE MEXICAN DIVORCE AND LIEUTENANT NABORS' SECOND MARRIAGE ARE VALID...

B-160591: Jun 5, 1970

THESE DECISIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED AS AUTHORITATIVE JUDICIAL DETERMINATIONS THAT THE ROSENSTIEL CASE IS FOR APPLICATION IN DETERMINING THE VALIDITY OF MEXICAN DIVORCES OBTAINED IN LIKE SITUATIONS BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER SEPTEMBER 1. 1970: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO LETTER DATED MARCH 26. IN ITS DISCUSSION OF THE QUESTION THE COMMITTEE SAYS THAT IT WAS HELD IN 47 COMP. THE COURT HELD THE DIVORCE WAS...