https://www.gao.gov/products/482645

B-160537: Oct 17, 1967

THE REJECTION OF THREE LOW BIDDERS BECAUSE THE STAFFING SCHEDULES SUBMITTED WERE INADEQUATE WHEN THE INVITATION DID NOT INDICATE THE WEIGHT TO BE GIVEN SUCH SCHEDULE IN EVALUATION RESULTED IN AN AWARD THAT DID NOT MEET THE CRITERIA OF COMPETITIVE BIDDING STATUTES IN 10 U.S.C. 2305. OBJECTION TO THE AWARD WILL NOT BE MADE. THE NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND WILL WLIMINATE THE PROBLEM IN FUTURE PROCUR...

https://www.gao.gov/products/411026

B-160537: Jan 08, 1968

SINCE EVALUATION OF BIDS FOR FOOD SERVICES ON BASIS OF PRODUCTIVE MAN HOURS ON THE MANNING SCHEDULE WAS NOT CONDUCTED IN OBJECTIVE MANNER CONSISTENT WITH 10 U.S.C. 2305. REVIEW DOES NOT INDICATE CONTRACT WAS AWARDED TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE. RESPONSIBLE BIDDER BECAUSE AWARD WAS NOT ON PRICE BUT ON INTANGIBLE FACTOR OF MANNING CHARTS. IT WAS HELD THAT THE INVITATION WAS DEFECTIVE. SECRETARY: REFERE...

https://www.gao.gov/products/411294

B-160537: Mar 24, 1967

INC.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 27. 532.46 WAS SUBMITTED BY B. THIRTEEN OTHER BIDS WERE RECEIVED RANGING IN PRICE FROM $1. THE LOWEST BID WAS DISREGARDED INASMUCH AS AN ERROR THEREIN WAS ALLEGED AND PROVEN PRIOR TO AWARD PURSUANT TO ASPR 2-406.3 (B). - WERE DETERMINED TO BE NONRESPONSIBLE BECAUSE OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE AREAS OF CAPACITY AND CREDIT. AWARD WAS MADE ON JANUARY 2...