B-155903: Apr 09, 1965

ATTORNEYS AT LAW: WE HAVE RECEIVED YOUR LETTER OF JANUARY 12. THE BID WAS NOT ACCEPTED BECAUSE THE CONTRACTING OFFICER DETERMINED THAT. YOU CONTEND THAT THE PRIMARY BASIS FOR THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S ACTION IS THE MERE EXISTENCE OF THE TERMINATIONS FOR DEFAULT OF JEN MAR'S PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AT/26-1/-36 AND -40 WITH NOVO. THAT THE DEFAULT ACTION WAS NOT JUSTIFIED BECAUSE CERTAIN DELAYS SUFFERED B...

B-155903: Jul 19, 1965

YOU CONTEND THAT YOUR BID FOR THE COMPLETE CONTRACT WAS LOWER THAN SIERRA-S. IF THIS ITEM NO. 2 IS AWARDED. THE AMOUNT TO BE DEDUCTED FROM THE PRICE QUOTED FOR ITEM NO. 1 WILL BE $. BIDS PERTINENT TO YOUR PROTEST WERE RECEIVED AS FOLLOWS: SCHEDULE. 000 WHEN THE IFB WAS PREPARED NO DECISION HAD BEEN MADE ON WHETHER TO AWARD A CONTRACT ON THE BASIS THAT THE CRANE AND HOIST EQUIPMENT WOULD BE FURNISH...