RETIRED: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED OCTOBER 22. THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM WAS SUSTAINED BY OUR DECISION OF OCTOBER 7. ARE TO THE SAME EFFECT AS THOSE MADE IN YOUR PREVIOUS LETTERS. YOUR LETTER CONTAINS NO MATERIAL FACT THAT WAS NOT FULLY CONSIDERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND IN OUR DECISION OF OCTOBER 7. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR A MODIFICATION OF THE CONCLUSIONS HERETOFORE REA...

RETIRED: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF AUGUST 15. YOU WERE ADVISED THAT THIS OFFICE IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO PAY ACTIVE DUTY PAY TO A MEMBER OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES UNLESS HE HAS BEEN ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY BY COMPETENT ORDERS AND ACTIVE DUTY HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN CONSEQUENCE OF SUCH ORDERS. IT APPEARS THAT YOU WERE TRANSFERRED FROM THE U.S. THAT YOU WERE PROMOTED TO COMMANDER AND WERE CONSIDE...

RETIRED: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 7. THERE IS NO FURTHER ACTION WHICH THIS OFFICE PROPERLY MAY TAKE IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR CLAIM. FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE WILL SERVE NO USEFUL PURPOSE AND ANY ADDITIONAL LETTERS RECEIVED FROM YOU RELATIVE TO YOUR CLAIM WILL BE FILED...