B-150905: May 24, 1963

KENNEDY: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR PROTEST OF FEBRUARY 25. IT HAS BEEN REPORTED TO US BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE THAT THE PROCUREMENT WAS CAREFULLY EVALUATED BY QUALIFIED AIR FORCE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL PRIOR TO ADVERTISING TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK INVOLVED. IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT ONLY APPROXIMATELY ONE PERCENT OF THE WORK REQUIRED COULD BE SO CLASSIFIED. MINIMUM W...

B-150905: Jun 26, 1963

RIEMAN: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED JUNE 5. WHILE YOU REQUEST ADVICE AS TO WHETHER WE "ARE IN ACCORD WITH GEEIA'S ASSUMPTION THAT THE DAVIS-BACON ACT DOES NOT APPLY" TO INSTALLATION AS DEFINED. IT IS NOTED THAT THE DEFINITION IS CONTAINED IN AN INSTRUCTION PROVIDING CLARIFICATION AND GUIDANCE IN STANDARDIZED TERMINOLOGY FOR INTRA AGENCY USE. NO MENTION IS MADE OF THE DAVIS BACON ACT. A...

B-150905: May 24, 1963

RIEMAN: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR PROTEST OF FEBRUARY 25. IT HAS BEEN REPORTED TO US BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE THAT THE PROCUREMENT WAS CAREFULLY EVALUATED BY QUALIFIED AIR FORCE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL PRIOR TO ADVERTISING TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK INVOLVED. IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT ONLY APPROXIMATELY ONE PERCENT OF THE WORK REQUIRED COULD BE SO CLASSIFIED. MINIMUM WA...