B-147928: Sep 21, 1962

TO KING AND KING: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF AUGUST 2. WAS NOT ENTITLED TO HAVE HIS RETIRED PAY COMPUTED UNDER SECTION 511 OF THE CAREER COMPENSATION ACT OF 1949. ADVISING THE ADDRESSEE THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO THE BENEFITS OF SECTION 411 AND YOU STATE THAT IT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SAME LETTER WAS SENT TO DIONICIO MANUEL. WE HAVE BEEN INFORMALLY ADVISED THAT MANUEL'S PERSONNEL...

B-147928: Jul 11, 1962

ATTORNEYS AT LAW: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF APRIL 24. WHO WERE RETIRED FOR DISABILITY PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1. OUR DECISION OF MARCH 27 WAS BASED ON THE CONCLUSION THAT. YOU QUESTION WHETHER AN ELECTION OF RETIRED PAY WAS EXTENDED TO HIM BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND STATE THAT THIS IS PROVED BY THE RECENT GREAVES CASE (AFLAGUE. 1962) WHERE YOU "UNSUCCESSFULLY CONTENDED THAT THE PLAINTIFF...

B-147928: Mar 27, 1962

ATTORNEYS AT LAW: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED JANUARY 3. IN WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL CLAIMANT WAS SEEKING INCREASED RETIRED PAY COMPUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CAREER INCENTIVE ACT OF 1955. IS STATED TO BE TYPICAL OF THESE CLAIMS. YOU INDICATE THAT YOU NOW HAVE IN YOUR POSSESSION A CHECK ISSUED IN HIS FAVOR IN PAYMENT OF OUR CLAIMS DIVISION SETTLEMENT OF NOVEMBER 30. YOU ARE ADVISED TH...