B-146185: Nov 15, 1963

RETIRED: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 30. YOU WERE FURNISHED FULL AND COMPLETE INFORMATION AS TO YOUR RIGHTS IN THE PREMISES AND YOU WERE ADVISED THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PAID THE FULL AMOUNT OF RETIRED PAY TO WHICH YOU ARE ENTITLED UNDER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW. IT APPEARS THAT NO USEFUL PURPOSE WILL BE SERVED BY FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE IN THIS MATTER...

B-146185: Feb 20, 1962

HILLARD DAUGHERTY: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 15. YOU WERE NOT PAID RETIRED PAY COMPUTED ON THE 2 1/2 PERCENT TIMES YEARS OF ACTIVE SERVICE FORMULA PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1. YOU WERE PAID ONE-THIRD OF BASE PAY PLUS ALL PERMANENT ADDITIONS AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 203 OF THE NAVAL RESERVE ACT OF 1938. YOUR RETIRED PAY WAS COMPUTED ON THE 2 1/2 PERCENT TIMES YEARS OF ACTIVE SERVICE...

B-146185: Dec 07, 1961

WE ADVISED YOU THAT WE WERE INSTRUCTING OUR CLAIMS DIVISION TO ISSUE A SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT ALLOWING YOU INCREASED RETIRED PAY FROM AUGUST 3. WE FIND THAT RETIRED PAY COMPUTED ON THE BASIS INDICATED IS LESS THAN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF RETIRED PAY RECEIVED BY YOU DURING THE PERIOD INVOLVED. ARE DISCLOSED IN THE FOLLOWING COMPUTATION: TABLE GROSS AMOUNT PAID TO YOU AS CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER (W-2) WIT...

B-146185: Sep 14, 1961

HILLARD DAUGHERTY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF MAY 18. WERE DISCHARGED MARCH 24. WERE DISCHARGED JUNE 6. WERE DISCHARGED JANUARY 6. WERE TRANSFERRED TO THE FLEET NAVAL RESERVE ON JULY 11. IT APPEARS THAT YOUR TRANSFER WAS EFFECTED PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF JULY 1. OR WHO HAVE COMPLETED SIXTEEN YEARS' SERVICE. RECEIVE THE SAME PAY AND ALLOWANCES AS NOW AUTHORIZED BY LAW FOR MEN TRANSFERRED TO...

B-146185: Jan 19, 1966

NAVY FINANCE CENTER: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 28. THE VOUCHER WAS FORWARDED AS A DOUBTFUL CLAIM WITH RESPECT TO APPLICATION OF THE 10-YEAR BARRING ACT OF OCTOBER 9. YOUR LETTER WILL BE REGARDED AS A REQUEST FOR AN ADVANCE DECISION. PAYMENT UNDER THAT DECISION IS NOW PROPOSED BASED ON THE CLAIMS PREVIOUSLY FILED BY HIM BY LETTERS OF JULY 30. HIS ORIGINAL CLAIM UNDER THE SANDERS D...

B-146185: Apr 05, 1962

YOU ARE STILL OF THE OPINION THAT ADDITIONAL RETIRED PAY WOULD BE DUE IF YOUR RETIRED PAY WERE COMPUTED UNDER THE RULE RECOGNIZED IN THE CASE OF MOJICA. SHOWED THAT RETIRED PAY SO COMPUTED WAS LESS THAN THAT WHICH HAS BEEN PAID TO YOU. IS $200 PER MONTH. YOU COULD ARRIVE AT A FIGURE THAT LARGE ONLY BY USING THE PAY RATE PRESCRIBED IN THE 1949 ACT AND SUCH RATE IS APPLICABLE IN YOUR CASE ONLY BY ME...

B-146185: Sep 23, 1963

TO CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER HILLARD DAUGHERTY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 28. THE USE OF WHICH WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF CLAIMS IN HULSE V. YOU ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE YOUR RETIRED PAY COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF 2- 1/2 PERCENTUM OF THE ANNUAL BASE AND LONGEVITY PAY YOU WERE RECEIVING AT THE TIME OF YOUR RELEASE FROM ACTIVE DUTY IN 1944 MULTIPLIED BY 25. YOU WERE ADV...

B-146185: Feb 24, 1964

RETIRED: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 30. ALTHOUGH WE HAVE FURNISHED YOU FULL AND COMPLETE INFORMATION AS TO YOUR RIGHTS IN THE PREMISES AND HAVE SHOWN THAT. YOU WERE PAID $1. 571.40 MORE THAN WOULD HAVE ACCRUED TO YOU UNDER THE VIEWS STATED IN OUR DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 14. SUCH ACTION WERE TAKEN. YOU WERE ADVISED IN OUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 15. ANY LETTERS RECEIVED FROM YOU IN THE F...