B-144503: Nov 29, 1961

LTD.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 9. SINCE THE TRAILER USED FOR THIS SHIPMENT WAS FULLY LOADED WE APPLIED TRUCKLOAD RATES. THAT EXCLUSIVE-USE TARIFF CHARGES ARE NOT APPLICABLE ON A SHIPMENT WHERE THE VEHICLE IS LOADED TO FULL CAPACITY. YOU CONTEND THAT THE CURTIS LIGHTING CASE INVOLVED QUESTIONS OF REASONABLENESS AND IS THUS WITHOUT EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE RULING OF THE SUPREME COUR...

B-144503: Apr 24, 1961

LTD.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 14. FOR THIS SERVICE YOU ORIGINALLY CLAIMED AND WERE PAID $2. THE CHARGES DEEMED ALLOWABLE ON TRUCKLOAD RATINGS WERE CONSTRUCTED OVER BALTIMORE. WHICH AMOUNT WAS COLLECTED BY DEDUCTION. SINCE THE TRAILER USED IN TRANSPORTING THE SHIPMENT WAS LOADED TO CAPACITY. IT IS YOUR CONTENTION THAT SINCE EXCLUSIVE USE OF VEHICLE SERVICE WAS REQUESTED AND FUR...

B-144503: Oct 02, 1961

LTD.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 9. SINCE THE TRAILER USED IN TRANSPORTING THE SHIPMENT WAS LOADED TO CAPACITY. THE DECISION IN THE CURTIS LIGHTING CASE HELD IN SUBSTANCE THAT EXCLUSIVE-USE TARIFF CHARGES ARE NOT APPLICABLE ON A SHIPMENT WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS LOADED TO FULL CAPACITY. YOU CONTEND THAT THE RULING IN THE CURTIS LIGHTING CASE IS NOT FOR APPLICATION SINCE THE SUBJECT SHIP...

B-144503: May 29, 1961

LTD.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF MAY 17. IS BASED ON REASONABLENESS RATHER THAN APPLICATION OF TARIFF PROVISIONS AND IS CONTRARY TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SECTION 217 (B). THE DISPOSITION OF THE CURTIS LIGHTING CASE BY THE COMMISSION WAS ON THE BASIS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE TARIFF PROVISIONS. COPIES OF WHICH ARE ENCLOSED FOR YOUR READY REFERENCE. IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF THE C...

B-144503: Jan 22, 1962

LTD.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 8. SINCE THE TRAILER USED FOR THE SHIPMENT WAS FULLY LOADED. TRUCKLOAD RATES WERE APPLIED AND OUR PREVIOUS DECISIONS RELIED UPON AUTHORITY OF CURTIS LIGHTING. ARE NOT APPLICABLE ON A SHIPMENT WHERE THE VEHICLE IS LOADED TO FULL CAPACITY. WHICH PROVIDES THE MINIMUM CHARGE FOR EXCLUSIVE-USE SERVICE WAS NOT APPLICABLE. YOU AGAIN URGE THAT THE CURTIS...