T. OVERSTREET COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED OCTOBER 9. YOU STATE IN YOUR LETTER THAT YOU DO NOT CLAIM BAD FAITH ON THE PART OF THE DISPOSAL OFFICER BUT DO CLAIM THAT POOR ATTENTION WAS GIVEN TO THE FACTS BY THE PERSON WHO SUBMITTED TO THE DISPOSAL OFFICER A DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPRESSOR. WE NORMALLY ASSUME THAT EVERY DISPOSAL OFFICER BELIEVES IN THE ACCURACY OF HIS DESCRIPTION AN...

T. OVERSTREET COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 1. THIS WAS FULLY UNDERSTOOD. REGARDLESS OF THE LANGUAGE USED WE ARE UNABLE TO FIND A LEGAL BASIS FOR GRANTING ANY RELIEF IN THE MATTER. THE PRESENT RECORD APPEARS TO REQUIRE THE CONCLUSION THAT YOUR BID WAS ACCEPTED IN GOOD FAITH. THE RIGHT TO HAVE PERFORMANCE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE PRICE Q...

T. OVERSTREET COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 4. YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED FOR THE REASONS SET OUT THEREIN. THE SETTLEMENT WAS SUSTAINED BY OUR DECISIONS DATED OCTOBER 7. STATING FULLY THE REASONS ON WHICH THEY WERE BASED AND COURT DECISIONS SUPPORTING THE ACTION TAKEN. URGING THAT YOU WERE NOT SEEKING A REFUND BUT AN EXCHANGE. YOUR REQUEST WAS FOR A REFUND. THE SAME LEGAL PR...

T. OVERSTREET COMPANY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 16. YOU ALLEGE THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO INSPECT PROPERLY THE COMPRESSOR AS IT WAS STORED CLOSE TO OTHER EQUIPMENT AND THAT "MR. MIERCHUK ADVISED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE A CRANE OR OTHER EQUIPMENT TO EITHER MOVE THIS COMPRESSOR OUT OR TO MOVE OTHER EQUIPMENT THAT WAS VERY CLOSE.'. YOU WERE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT USED PROP...