B-126371: Nov 29, 1956

MCGRORY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 15. YOU DO NOT CITE THE COURT OF CLAIMS DECISION BUT THE ONE YOU DOUBTLESS HAVE IN MIND IS THE ONE RENDERED BY THE COURT OF CLAIMS NOVEMBER 7. IN THAT CASE THE COURT HELD THAT NOTWITHSTANDING THE ISSUANCE OF A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION TO A WARRANT OFFICER HE WAS NOT A COMMISSIONED OFFICER WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF SECTION 212 OF THE ECONOMY ACT OF J...

B-126371: Aug 27, 1957

MCGRORY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF AUGUST 18. - WHICH WAS PASSED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND IS NOW PENDING WITH THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE. YOU INDICATE THAT DOUBT AS TO WHETHER YOU HAVE EXHAUSTED ALL ADMINISTRATIVE MEANS OF OBTAINING THE RELIEF PROVIDED IN THE BILL. HAS DELAYED ITS FURTHER CONSIDERATION IN THE SENATE COMMITTEE AND YOU ASK THAT INFORMATI...

B-126371: Feb 07, 1958

MCGRORY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JANUARY 21. YOUR CASE IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE PLAINTIFF IN TATO V. UNDER THE RULE OF THOSE CASES YOU ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ANY DUAL COMPENSATION INDEBTEDNESS. HAS NOT EXPIRED AND WE PROPERLY MAY NOT APPLY THE DECISION IN THAT CASE TO MATTERS BEFORE US UNTIL SUCH PERIOD HAS EXPIRED OR WE ARE ADVISED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THAT NO FURTHER PROCEEDINGS WILL...

B-126371: Nov 29, 1956

MCCRORY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 15. YOU DO NOT CITE THE COURT OF CLAIMS DECISION BUT THE ONE YOU DOUBTLESS HAVE IN MIND IS THE ONE RENDERED BY THE COURT OF CLAIMS NOVEMBER 7. IN THAT CASE THE COURT HELD THAT NOTWITHSTANDING THE ISSUANCE OF A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION TO A WARRANT OFFICER HE WAS NOT A COMMISSIONED OFFICER WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF SECTION 212 OF THE ECONOMY ACT OF J...