EGNACIA VICENTE: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF OCTOBER 5. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY REPORTED IN YOUR HUSBAND'S CASE THAT THEY HAVE NO RECORD SHOWING THAT YOUR DECEASED HUSBAND WAS AN EMPLOYEE OF THAT DEPARTMENT DURING THE PERIOD OF WORLD WAR II IN THE PHILIPPINES. THE RULE IN THAT REGARD IS THAT WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE FACTS ALLEGED BY A CLAIMANT AND THE FACTS ADMINISTRATIVELY...

EGNACIA VICENTE: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF NOVEMBER 12. YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED FOR THE REASON THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS THAT YOUR HUSBAND WAS ACTUALLY APPOINTED TO A POSITION WITH THE UNITED STATES ARMY OR WHETHER THERE WAS ANY UNPAID COMPENSATION DUE HIM AT THE TIME OF HIS DEATH. YOU STATED THAT CIVILIANS SUCH AS YOUR HUSBAND WERE NOT APPOINTED BUT WERE MEREL...

YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED BY SETTLEMENT OF OUR OFFICE DATED MAY 27. DULAY WAS APPOINTED AS A SALARIED EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY. THERE WAS ENCLOSED WITH YOUR LETTER AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAXIMO SABINAY WHICH STATES THAT HE WAS EMPLOYED AS FOREMAN BY THE PCAU IN CHARGE OF MEN. - WHO WERE WORKING AS RATION CARRIERS DURING THE LIBERATION CAMPAIGNS IN THE PHILIPPINES BETWEEN FEBRUARY 1945 AND MAY 1...