INC.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO A LETTER OF JULY 21. 928 1/2 YARDS WERE DELIVERED TO YOU. 582 YARDS ACTUALLY WERE USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF THE 70. 350 1/2 YARDS) WAS DISALLOWED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE SETTLEMENT OF DECEMBER 3. IN THE REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF THE SETTLEMENT IT IS CONTENDED THAT THE COATING OF THE SURPLUS MATERIAL RETURNED TO THE GOVERNMENT REPRESENTS ADDITIONAL COATING SERVICES NOT...

INC.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO A LETTER OF APRIL 25. THE ENCLOSURE IS AN AFFIDAVIT BY YOUR COMPANY MANAGER CONTAINING HIS STATEMENTS AND OPINION REGARDING THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S LETTER OF AUGUST 22. WHICH WAS THE SUBJECT OF A PREVIOUS INTERVIEW BY YOUR ATTORNEY WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF OUR OFFICE. ARE FULLY SET FORTH IN THE DECISION OF OCTOBER 14. THE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE NO...

INC.: REFERENCE IS MADE TO LETTERS OF JULY 17 AND 19. IT APPEARS TO BE YOUR ATTORNEY'S CONTENTION THAT THE REPORTED ORAL INSTRUCTIONS WERE IN ADDITION TO THE INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE LETTER OF AUGUST 22. THIS MATTER IS SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED IN OUR DECISION OF OCTOBER 14. AS A RESULT OF THE CONFERENCE WITH YOUR ATTORNEY AND IN VIEW OF HIS INSISTENCE THAT THERE WERE CERTAIN ORAL...