Comments on the Interpretation of Section 1312 of the Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1952

B-106437: Dec 26, 1951

Additional Materials:


Julie Matta
(202) 512-4023


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO commented on whether funds transferred to defense activities under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior from appropriations provided in the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1952, may be expended in accordance with the terms of the appropriation to which the transfers are made. GAO noted that: (1) funds transferred pursuant to the authority quoted would be merged with the appropriation for defense production activities, and would be used in the discharge of defense production responsibilities as distinguished from transfers or advances of funds which might be made under other authority to carry out functions for which the funds were originally appropriated; (2) it would appear the terms of the defense production appropriation should apply to funds transferred under the provisions of section 1312 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act; (3) while section 1312 authorizes the transfer of appropriations of funds from a regular activity to a defense activity of an agency when necessary for the discharge of responsibilities relating to the national defense assigned to such agency, any transfer when accomplished would constitute a reappropriation of such moneys for such purposes; (4) under the circumstances, funds transferred become divorced from other funds appropriated for regular activities and thereafter are available for the same objects and purposes and subject to the same limitations as the appropriation for defense protection activities; and (5) funds transferred pursuant to section 1312, to defense activities under the jurisdiction of the Interior are for expenditures in accordance with the terms of the appropriation to which transferred.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here