Indian Trust Fund Testimony Q&As
AIMD-95-33R: Published: Dec 2, 1994. Publicly Released: Dec 2, 1994.
- Full Report:
Questions were raised concerning the Department of the Interior's failure to correct serious problems in the management of Indian Trust Funds. GAO noted that: (1) although Interior officials believe that the 6-Point Trust Funds and Trust Asset Management Reform Plans will correct all serious trust fund management problems, the 6-Point Plan falls short of a comprehensive strategic plan; (2) the Bureau of Indian Affairs' (BIA) streamlining plan calls for a 50-percent reduction in staff by the end of fiscal year 1995; (3) Interior officials believe that the Department should establish a G-Fund through the Department of the Treasury for Indian trust fund investments; (4) even if a G-Fund is established, Interior would still need to provide for both investment advisor and custodian services; (5) the American Indian Trust Fund Reform Act of 1994 establishes a mechanism for tribes to assume management and control of their trust funds; (6) the fractionated ownership group, Individual Indian Money (IIM) Reconciliation working group, and the Land Records working group have been formed to resolve issues concerning IIM accounts; (7) the 6-Point Plan does not address a number of fundamental actions needed to resolve trust fund management problems; (8) the BIA streamlining plan lacks a mission statement and information on how BIA will transfer trust fund management to tribes; and (9) a spokesperson for Indian interests would ensure that Indian interests are fully articulated and considered before program and organizational changes.