Reported Medicaid Year 2000 Readiness

AIMD-00-22R: Published: Oct 5, 1999. Publicly Released: Oct 5, 1999.

Additional Materials:


Joel C. Willemssen
(202) 512-6253


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO determined: (1) what the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) is doing to ensure that the year 2000 computing challenge does not adversely affect the delivery of Medicaid benefits; and (2) the readiness of states to successfully transition to year 2000 for Medicaid.

GAO noted that: (1) HCFA has taken several actions that have significantly reduced the risk that the Medicaid program will encounter year 2000 failures; (2) in particular, it has adopted an approach that includes three rounds of on-site contractor reviews of states using a standard methodology; (3) between November 1998 and April 1999, the contractor completed the initial round of on-site reviews in all 50 states and the District of Columbia; (4) these reviews included assessments of states' integrated eligibility systems and Medicaid management information systems (MMIS) in areas such as project management and planning, remediation progress, testing, and contingency planning; (5) since May 1999, HCFA's contractor has conducted a second round of on-site reviews in 40 states; (6) to complement its system reviews, HCFA obtained another contractor to review state business continuity and contingency plans; (7) without contingency plans, if unpredicted failures occur, an entity will not have well-defined responses and may not have enough time to develop and test alternatives; (8) in addition to evaluating state system remediation activities and business continuity and contingency plans, HCFA has provided assistance to states through the issuance of guidance and best practices documents; (9) according to the system assessment contractor's completed round 2 reports of 37 states and the District of Columbia that had been visited during both rounds, half of the state systems risk ratings improved, 45 percent stayed the same, and 5 percent declined; (10) as of October 4, 1999: (a) 4 eligibility systems and 5 MMISs were assessed at high risk; (b) 13 eligibility systems and 8 MMISs were assessed at medium risk; and (c) 36 eligibility systems and 40 MMISs were assessed at low risk; (11) HCFA's business continuity and contingency plan contractor found problems in state efforts as well; (12) in particular, of the 33 states and two territories that have been reviewed, 11 were considered high risk, 11 medium risk, and 13 low risk; (13) many states were reported to have open issues, such as insufficient plan details, inadequate project documentation, and incomplete plans; (14) states that are in a particularly difficult position are those that have a high-risk system as well as a high risk business continuity and contingency plan; (15) two states fall into this situation; and (16) also in a difficult position are the six states with at least one medium-risk Medicaid system and a high-risk business continuity and contingency plan.

Nov 18, 2020

Nov 17, 2020

Nov 13, 2020

Nov 12, 2020

Nov 4, 2020

Oct 26, 2020

Oct 8, 2020

Oct 1, 2020

Sep 30, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here