Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration: Secure Flight Program
Highlights
GAO reviewed the Department of Homeland Seucrity, Transportation Secuirty Administration's (TSA) new rule on the Secure Flight Program. GAO found that (1) the final rule establishes TSA's Secure Flight program, under which TSA will receive passenger and certain non-traveler information, compare that information to the No Fly and Selectee portions of the federal government's consolidated terrorist watch-list, and transmit a printed boarding pass result to the aircraft operators; and (2) that TSA complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration: Secure Flight Program, GAO-09-169R, November 10, 2008
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye
Chairman
The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
The Honorable James L. Oberstar
Chairman
The Honorable John L. Mica
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
House of Representatives
Subject: Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration: Secure Flight Program
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), entitled Secure Flight Program (RIN: 1652-AA45). We received the rule on
The final rule establishes TSA's Secure Flight program, under which TSA will receive passenger and certain non-traveler information, compare that information to the No Fly and Selectee portions of the federal government's consolidated terrorist watch-list, and transmit a printed boarding pass result to the aircraft operators. The rule requires aircraft operators to submit passenger information to the TSA through a single portal for both the Secure Flight and the Advanced Passenger Information System.
Enclosed is our assessment of the TSA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that TSA complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Michael R. Volpe, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8236.
signed
Robert J. Cramer
Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Mardi Ruth Thompson
Deputy Chief Counsel for Regulations
Department of Homeland Security
ENCLOSURE
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
ENTITLED
"SECURE FLIGHT PROGRAM"
(RIN: 1652-AA45)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
TSA analyzed the costs and benefits of this final rule. TSA determined that the benefits of this rule will come in two phases. During the first phase the benefits may include increased aviation security resulting from the detection of additional threats. During the second phase the benefits will include more accurate, timely, and comprehensive screening, and a reduction in false positives. TSA estimates that the average annual costs over a 10-year period for this rule to be between $289.6 million and $382.7 million at a 3-percent discount rate and between $290.3 million and $383.5 million at a 7-percent discount rate.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603–605, 607, and 609
TSA concluded that this final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Nonetheless, TSA prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202–205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532–1535
TSA determined that this final rule does not contain any mandates on state, local, or tribal governments and that the overall impact on the private sector does not exceed $100 million.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
TSA promulgated this final rule using the notice and comment procedures found in the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. sect. 553. On
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501–3520
This rule contains information collection requirements subject to the Act and TSA has submitted these requirements to the Office of Management and Budget for review. TSA estimates that the total annual hour burden for this final rule to be 552,856 hours.
Statutory authorization for the rule
TSA promulgated this final rule under the authority of sections 114, 5103, 40113, 44901–44907, 44913–44914, 44916–44918, 44932, 44935–44936, 44942, and 46105 of title 49, United States Code.
Trade Agreement Act of 1979, 19 U.S.C. sections 2501–2581
The Act prohibits federal agencies from engaging in standards-related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. sections 4321–4370f
TSA analyzed this final rule under the Act and a related Department of Homeland Security directive. TSA determined that this final rule is excluded from further analysis under the Act by several categorical exclusions.
Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), 42 U.S.C. sections 6201–6422
TSA determined that this final rule is not a major energy regulation action under the Act.
Executive Order No. 12,866
TSA determined that this is an economically significant rule under the Order because the estimated annual costs are greater than $100 million.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
TSA determined that this final rule will not have a substantial direct effect on states, the relationship between the federal government and states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the levels of government. TSA therefore concluded that this final rule will not have federalism impacts under the Order.