Sundt Construction, Inc.
B-288136
Published: Sep 25, 2001. Publicly Released: Sep 25, 2001.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
A firm protested an Army Corps of Engineers contract award for construction services, contending that evaluation was not in accord with the stated evaluation scheme of the solicitation. GAO held that the protester's proposal was given appropriate credit under the only evaluation subfactor that addressed housing unit type and that the awardee's proposal had strengths under the other evaluation factors and subfactors that offset the protester's advantage under the housing unit type subfactor. Accordingly, the protest was denied.