Sundt Construction, Inc.

B-288136: Sep 25, 2001

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army Corps of Engineers contract award for construction services, contending that evaluation was not in accord with the stated evaluation scheme of the solicitation. GAO held that the protester's proposal was given appropriate credit under the only evaluation subfactor that addressed housing unit type and that the awardee's proposal had strengths under the other evaluation factors and subfactors that offset the protester's advantage under the housing unit type subfactor. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 23, 2020

Oct 22, 2020

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here