B-126994, JUL. 25, 1956

B-126994: Jul 25, 1956

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Julie Matta
(202) 512-4023
MattaJ@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

A REVIEW OF THE RECORDS DISCLOSES THAT YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED FOR THE REASON THAT YOUR RESIGNATION WAS ACCEPTED IN THE TERMS TENDERED BY YOU. FROM A CAREFUL READING THEREOF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THEY ADD NO NEW OR MATERIAL EVIDENCE TO THE RECORD BEFORE OUR OFFICE. WHICH PREVIOUSLY HAVE BEEN EXPLAINED TO YOU.

B-126994, JUL. 25, 1956

TO MRS. EMMA M. GILTINAN:

WE REFER TO YOUR RECENT LETTER REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION OF THE DECISION OF MAY 8, 1956, WHICH SUSTAINED THE DISALLOWANCE OF YOUR CLAIM FOR UNUSED LEAVE TO YOUR CREDIT AT THE TIME OF YOUR SEPARATION FROM THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION.

A REVIEW OF THE RECORDS DISCLOSES THAT YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED FOR THE REASON THAT YOUR RESIGNATION WAS ACCEPTED IN THE TERMS TENDERED BY YOU. IN YOUR CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE YOU MAKE CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS, BUT FROM A CAREFUL READING THEREOF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THEY ADD NO NEW OR MATERIAL EVIDENCE TO THE RECORD BEFORE OUR OFFICE.

YOUR CLAIM HAS BEEN CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BY OUR OFFICE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS AND WE REGRET TO INFORM YOU THAT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES INVOLVED, WHICH PREVIOUSLY HAVE BEEN EXPLAINED TO YOU, THERE EXISTS NO AUTHORITY OF LAW FOR ITS ALLOWANCE.

Nov 16, 2018

Nov 15, 2018

Nov 14, 2018

Nov 9, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here