[Protest of Army Rejection of Bid for Food And Dining Facility Attendant Services]

B-270645.2: May 24, 1996

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid for full food and dining facility attendant services, contending that the Army: (1) unreasonably evaluated its bid; (2) improperly excluded its bid from the competitive range; and (3) improperly gave the awardee credit for its experience as the incumbent contractor. GAO held that: (1) the Army reasonably determined that the protester's staffing plan was deficient; (2) the Army properly excluded the protester's bid from the competitive range, since it had no change for award; and (3) there was no evidence that the Army gave the awardee an unfair competitive advantage. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Dec 13, 2018

Dec 12, 2018

Dec 11, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here