[Protest of Army Rejection of Bid for Food And Dining Facility Attendant Services]

B-270645.2: May 24, 1996

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid for full food and dining facility attendant services, contending that the Army: (1) unreasonably evaluated its bid; (2) improperly excluded its bid from the competitive range; and (3) improperly gave the awardee credit for its experience as the incumbent contractor. GAO held that: (1) the Army reasonably determined that the protester's staffing plan was deficient; (2) the Army properly excluded the protester's bid from the competitive range, since it had no change for award; and (3) there was no evidence that the Army gave the awardee an unfair competitive advantage. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 21, 2019

Mar 20, 2019

Mar 19, 2019

Mar 15, 2019

Mar 13, 2019

Mar 12, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here