[Protest of Army Contract Award for Binoculars]

B-265602,B-265602.2: Dec 15, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for binoculars, contending that the awardee's bid price was materially unbalanced and the Army improperly: (1) waived a mandatory technical requirement for the awardee; (2) downgraded its bid based on unstated evaluation criteria; and (3) ignored a negative preaward survey in evaluating the awardee's bid. GAO held that the: (1) awardee's bid price reasonably reflected the cost of an engineering modification required for initial prototypes; (2) awardee sufficiently documented its intent to comply with the mandatory technical requirements; (3) Army properly evaluated the protester's bid in accordance with stated evaluation criteria; and (4) Army properly considered the preaward survey in evaluating the awardee's bid. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 15, 2019

Mar 13, 2019

Mar 12, 2019

Mar 8, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here