[Protest of Army Contract Award for Missile Demonstration Program]

B-259255.6: May 8, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a proposed Army contract award for a missile demonstration program, contending that the Army: (1) conducted flawed technical and cost evaluations; and (2) failed to conduct meaningful discussions with it regarding its technical proposal. GAO held that: (1) the Army reasonably evaluated the protester's bid in accordance with the stated evaluation criteria; (2) there was no evidence that the Army's cost evaluation was flawed; (3) the Army reasonably determined that the awardee's engineering approach was sufficient for continued design development; and (4) the Army conducted meaningful discussions and reasonably led the protester into areas of concern regarding its missile design and performance. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Nov 25, 2020

Nov 24, 2020

Nov 20, 2020

Nov 19, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here