[Protest of Army Rejection of Bid for School Crossing Attendants]

B-258126.2: Jan 18, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid for school crossing attendants, contending that the Army: (1) unreasonably determined that its bid contained an error; (2) improperly rejected its bid as materially unbalanced; and (3) acted in bad faith and improperly rejected its bid in retaliation to its protest under a previous contract. GAO held that the: (1) Army properly rejected the protester's bid as materially unbalanced; (2) Army reasonably determined that the protester's bid contained an error, since its bid was substantially lower than the government estimate; (3) protester failed to provide any documentation supporting its low bid; and (4) protester failed to provide any evidence that the Army acted in bad faith when it rejected its bid. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Sep 17, 2019

Sep 16, 2019

Sep 13, 2019

Sep 12, 2019

  • TCG, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest in part and deny the protest in part.

Sep 11, 2019

Sep 10, 2019

Sep 9, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here