[Protest of Air Force Solicitation for Engineering Services]

B-257627.2: Dec 21, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Air Force solicitation for follow-on engineering services, contending that the Air Force: (1) unreasonably determined that two other bidders submitted acceptable technical proposals, since only it could perform the required services; and (2) failed to consider the transition costs associated with a new contractor and to provide for a cost realism analysis. GAO held that the: (1) Air Force reasonably evaluated the technical proposals and determined that they were acceptable; (2) protester untimely filed its protest of competitors' access to its proprietary data; (3) protester should have raised the issue in a request for reconsideration of an earlier sustained protest; (4) Air Force adequately addressed the issue of one bidder's proposed employment of the incumbent's employees; (5) Air Force was not required to request cost data and perform a cost realism analysis; and (6) Air Force reasonably decided not to include transition costs in the price evaluation, since the costs were highly speculative and would hinder competition. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Sep 17, 2019

Sep 16, 2019

Sep 13, 2019

Sep 12, 2019

  • TCG, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest in part and deny the protest in part.

Sep 11, 2019

Sep 10, 2019

Sep 9, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here