[Protest of Army Contract Award for Oxygen Distribution System]

B-250136.5: Mar 22, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for oxygen distribution systems, contending that the Army: (1) was biased against it; (2) improperly evaluated its bid and failed to adequately consider its experience; (3) afforded the awardee a competitive advantage, since it was the incumbent contractor; and (4) failed to sufficiently advise it of the solicitation's potential risks. GAO held that the: (1) protester did not provide sufficient evidence to support its allegation of bias; (2) Army properly evaluated the protester's bid; (3) awardee did not gain an unfair competitive advantage as a result of its incumbency; and (4) Army properly advised the protester of the solicitation's potential risks. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Nov 25, 2020

Nov 24, 2020

Nov 20, 2020

Nov 19, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here