[Protest of Army Contract Award for Maintenance]

B-251761.4: Jul 20, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for maintenance services, contending that the Army: (1) failed to follow the solicitation's evaluation criteria; (2) failed to notify the bidders that bids would be adjusted to reflect cost realism; (3) did not perform an adequate cost realism evaluation; and (4) should have awarded it the contract, since the technical bids were essentially equal and it was the low bidder. GAO held that the Army properly: (1) evaluated the cost and technical bids in accordance with the solicitation's evaluation criteria; (2) notified the bidders that bid evaluation and award would be adjusted for cost realism; and (3) awarded the contract to the technically superior bidder. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Jul 9, 2020

Jul 8, 2020

Jul 7, 2020

Jul 6, 2020

Jul 1, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here