Skip to main content

[DOE Employee's Claim for Hazardous Duty Pay]

B-246364 Apr 14, 1992
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A Department of Energy (DOE) employee claimed a hazardous duty pay differential, contending that questionable containers and ear protection devices did not effectively safeguard his exposure to hazardous materials and high noise levels. GAO held that DOE: (1) developed adequate safeguards to prevent potential exposure to hazardous materials and excessive noise levels; and (2) properly considered the position's risks and discomforts and the nature of the work assigned in determining the position's grade and classification. Accordingly, the claim was denied.

Downloads

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs