[Request for Reconsideration of Protest Against GSA Delivery Terms]
B-238117.2: Aug 17, 1990
- Full Report:
A firm requested reconsideration of its protest against the General Services Administration's delivery terms for tables. GAO had held that the protester failed to show that the delivery terms were unreasonable or inconsistent with applicable regulations. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that: (1) GAO failed to find the destination requirement unnecessary to satisfy the government's needs and unduly restrictive; (2) the contracting officer violated and effectively modified a GSA policy statement; and (3) the contracting officer violated the Federal Acquisition Regulation and abused his discretion. GAO held that the protester: (1) essentially restated its original arguments; and (2) failed to establish any error of law or provide information not previously considered. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.