[Protest of Navy Contract Award for Engineering and Technical Advisor Services]
B-237865: Apr 3, 1990
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
A firm protested a Navy contract award for engineering and technical advisor services, contending that the: (1) Navy failed to conduct a cost analysis of all bids; (2) Navy failed to follow the specified evaluation criteria; and (3) awardee was not responsible. GAO held that: (1) the Navy was not required to perform a cost analysis, since it obtained adequate price competition; (2) the Navy was not required to evaluate proposed professional employee compensation, since none of the personnel required to perform the requirements met the definition of professional employees; (3) it would not review the Navy's affirmative determination of the awardee's responsibility absent a showing of fraud or bad faith; and (4) the awardee's compliance with contractual obligations concerned contract administration. Accordingly, the protest was denied.
Mar 20, 2019
Mar 19, 2019
Mar 15, 2019
-
AeroSage, LLC--Costs
We recommend that AeroSage be reimbursed $350 out of its total claim of $26,450.
B-416381.6 -
Analytical Solutions by Kline, LLC
We deny the protest in part and dismiss it in part.
B-417161,B-417161.2 -
-
Mar 13, 2019
Mar 12, 2019
-
-
-
AlliantCorps, LLC
We sustain the protest in part and deny the protest in part.
B-417126,B-417126.3,B-417126.4
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
