[Protest of Army Contract Award for Engineering and Technical Support Services]
B-237054
Published: Jan 29, 1990. Publicly Released: Jan 29, 1990.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
A firm protested an Army contract award for instrumentation development, contending that the Army: (1) inconsistently applied the evaluation criteria by emphasizing technical factors over cost factors; and (2) should have awarded it the contract as the low, technically acceptable bidder. GAO held that the Army: (1) consistently applied the stated criteria in determining that the protester's bid was technically deficient and unrealistically low; and (2) properly awarded the contract to the bidder offering the best value. Accordingly, the protest was denied.
Full Report
Office of Public Affairs
Topics
Army procurementBid evaluation protestsContract award protestsCost analysisEvaluation criteriaMinimum wage ratesQuestionable procurement chargesService contractsTechnical proposal evaluationSolicitationsU.S. ArmyBid proposals