[Request for Reconsideration of Protest of AID Delivery Order]
Highlights
A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest against an Agency for International Development (AID) delivery order. GAO had held that AID properly: (1) determined that the protester's bid price was unreasonable; and (2) sought alternative proposals from other bidders. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that GAO: (1) should have waited for the outcome of the AID investigation regarding its allegations before issuing its decision; and (2) failed to address the adequacy of AID regulations governing the issuance of delivery orders. GAO held that the protester failed to: (1) show that the original decision contained any factual or legal errors; or (2) provide any new information warranting reversal or modification of the original decision. Accordingly, the dismissal was affirmed.