[Protest of Army Contract Award for Data Collection Services]

B-228410: Dec 16, 1987

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for data collection, contending that the Army: (1) improperly evaluated its proposal; (2) did not hold adequate discussions with it; and (3) should have awarded it the contract, since its bid was technically superior and low. GAO held that the Army: (1) properly evaluated bids using its own estimated costs; (2) was not required to conduct discussions with the protester, since its bid was reasonable and devoid of technical uncertainties; and (3) properly awarded the contract to the low bidder, since its bid was technically equal to the protester's. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Jan 21, 2021

Jan 19, 2021

Jan 14, 2021

Looking for more? Browse all our products here