[Protest of Army Contract Award for Duplicating Equipment]

B-228086: Dec 15, 1987

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army delivery order under a federal supply schedule contract for duplicating equipment, contending that: (1) its product was equal to and lower-priced than the awardee's; and (2) the solicitation's requirements exceeded the Army's minimum needs and were restrictive of competition. GAO held that the: (1) solicitation requirements reflected the Army's actual needs; and (2) protester's product did not possess certain features essential to meet those needs. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Nov 24, 2020

Nov 20, 2020

Nov 19, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here