[Protest of Navy Contract Award for Antenna Tracking System]

B-222585.7: Feb 6, 1987

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Navy contract award to another firm for an antenna tracking system, contending that the Navy: (1) should have awarded it the contract, since its bid was the lowest; (2) should not have considered the element of risk as part of the evaluation criteria; (3) violated procurement regulations by treating the procurement as a sole-source contract; (4) technical review board showed bias toward the awardee; and (5) improperly evaluated the proposals. GAO held that: (1) the Navy was not required to award the contract to the firm offering the lowest cost, since the solicitation did not specify that cost would be the determinative factor; (2) the Navy properly evaluated proposals based on the degree of risk involved, since that clearly related to capability and approach; (3) there was no merit to the protester's allegation of bias; and (4) it would not review whether the Navy improperly evaluated a technical proposal absent a showing of unreasonableness, abuse of discretion, or violation of procurement statutes or regulations. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Jan 21, 2021

Jan 19, 2021

Jan 14, 2021

Looking for more? Browse all our products here