[Protest of Education Contract Award for Bilingual Education Program Resource Centers]

B-222591.2: Oct 9, 1986

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A state agency protested a Department of Education contract award for the development and operation of a five-state area regional resource center for bilingual education, contending that Education: (1) unreasonably excluded it from the competitive range; (2) failed to notify it that its proposal was technically unacceptable and failed to conduct discussions with it; (3) unreasonably found that its proposal was weak with respect to the other states in its service area, because the proposal was prepared as a consortium effort with the other four states, all of which had considerable experience; and (4) was biased against it. GAO held that: (1) Education reasonably determined that the proposal was so weak that the protester could not make it acceptable without a major revision; (2) Education notified the protester that it was excluding the proposal from the competitive range, and was not required to otherwise notify the protester that the proposal was unacceptable; (3) since the proposal was outside of the competitive range, Education was not required to conduct discussions with the protester; (4) Education was required to evaluate the proposal on the basis of information presented, rather than on the basis of the protester's inherent capabilities; (5) the proposal included no information indicating specifically how the other states intended to support the contract effort; (6) there was no evidence that Education was biased against the protester; and (7) a specific evaluation panel member that the protester claimed was biased did not participate in the evaluation of the protester's proposal. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 23, 2020

Oct 22, 2020

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here