[Protest of Army Contract Award for Portable Toilets Servicing]
B-222640: Jul 1, 1986
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
A firm protested an Army contract award for the rental and servicing of portable chemical toilets, contending that: (1) the awardee's bid was nonresponsive; and (2) the solicitation's language was ambiguous. GAO found that: (1) the awardee's use of a no-charge bid for a line item was responsive because the bid corresponded with a zero-dollar bid and represented the awardee's affirmative commitment to provide the item at no cost to the government; and (2) the solicitation's language was not ambiguous because there was only one reasonable interpretation of the solicitation's evaluation factor. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.
Feb 24, 2021
Feb 22, 2021
Feb 19, 2021
Feb 18, 2021
Feb 17, 2021
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
