[Protest of Air Force Contract Award for Cost Analysis Study]

B-220431: Mar 13, 1986

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Air Force contract award, contending that: (1) its proposed hourly cost was 50-percent lower than the awardee's rate; (2) the Air Force did not show that the awardee's proposal was technically superior to its proposal; and (3) the Air Force did not conduct meaningful discussions with it concerning the weaknesses in its proposal. GAO has held that: (1) a contracting agency may determine that it is more advantageous to award a contract to an offerer with a higher priced, technically superior proposal, if technical advantages offset the lower priced, technically acceptable proposal; (2) an offerer is not automatically entitled to an award merely because it offered the lowest price; and (3) an agency is not obligated to make an award to a low offerer unless the solicitation specifies that cost will be the determinative factor. GAO found that: (1) offerers were on notice that cost would be the least important consideration in determining the awardee; (2) the Air Force reasonably determined that the awardee's proposal was superior to all other proposals and constituted the best value to the government; and (3) the protester did not file a separate protest concerning the Air Force's failure to conduct discussions with it until 6 weeks after it was notified of the award and, therefore, that aspect of its protest was untimely filed. Accordingly, the protest was denied in part and dismissed in part.

Oct 23, 2020

Oct 22, 2020

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here