[Protest of DSS Army Contract Award]

B-213661: Jun 22, 1984

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a contract award to another firm under an Army solicitation, contending that the Army: (1) improperly rejected the protester's technical proposal under the negotiated procurement; and (2) allowed certain procedural irregularities, to the prejudice of the protester. The Army excluded the protester's proposal from the competitive range after determining that discussions could not remedy deficiencies in the proposal. The protester argued that the deficiencies were minor and correctible by discussions. GAO held that the Army improperly excluded the proposal from the competitive range because: (1) the deficiencies were minor and could have been remedied by discussions; and (2) the exclusion of the proposal left only one proposal in the competitive range. Accordingly, the protest was sustained. GAO recommended that the Army: (1) not exercise any options under the contract; (2) resolicit any requirements not yet fulfilled under the awarded contract; and (3) pay the protester proposal preparation costs upon submission of a substantiated claim for such costs.

Oct 29, 2020

Oct 28, 2020

Oct 27, 2020

  • Silver Investments, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest as untimely because it was filed more than 10 days after the protester knew, or should have known, the basis for its protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here