Alleged Impropriety in Negotiated Solicitation

B-183089: Feb 12, 1975

Additional Materials:


Ralph O. White
(202) 512-8278

Kenneth E. Patton
(202) 512-8205


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

The protester objected to the issuance of an amendment to a solicitation, alleging that the amendment which extended the closing date for receipt of offers without extending the preperformance mobilization period constituted a prejudicial restrictive condition. The protest was not for consideration by GAO since the unanswered protest to the contracting agency was untimely filed after the extended closing date for receipt of offers.

Oct 23, 2020

Oct 22, 2020

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here