Recent hurricanes, wildfires, and other events have highlighted the challenges the federal government faces in responding effectively to natural and man-made disasters—both in terms of immediate response and for long-term recovery efforts.
Response and Recovery
The 2017 and 2018 hurricanes and wildfires affected millions of individuals and caused billions of dollars in damages. In March 2019, the Midwest also experienced historic flooding that affected millions of acres of agriculture and damaged significant infrastructure. Since 2005, the federal government has spent at least $450 billion on disaster assistance.
Our report on the federal response to the 2017 hurricanes and wildfires found numerous challenges slowed FEMA’s work. For example, complex logistics for supplies due to distances from the mainland, and the need to provide a number of services due to widespread devastation and loss of power.
Watch our Facebook Live chat with Chris Currie, a Director in our Homeland Security and Justice team, discussing a range of issues related to federal disaster response, recovery, and resilience.
Cuppa GAO: Coffee With Our Experts, chat with Chris Currie, Director, Homeland Security and JusticeView the transcript
Strengthening Response and Building Resilience
Federal agencies provide significant funding to state, localities, tribes, and territories and this number is likely to increase due to the rising number and costs of disasters and the increasing reliance on the federal government for disaster assistance. We have made numerous recommendations to FEMA to strengthen disaster response efforts.
House elevation and metal roofs are examples of hazard mitigation measures in Florida.
- Disaster Resilience. FEMA has multiple grant programs that can help jurisdictions plan and implement disaster resilience projects. For example, FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant program helps jurisdictions affected by a disaster take actions to reduce future losses as they recover. However, we found that, in the wake of Hurricane Sandy, jurisdictions faced a variety of challenges using these funds to maximize resilience. An investment strategy to better prioritize, integrate, and balance disaster resilience efforts would help.
- Federal Coordination. We’ve identified a number of ways that FEMA could improve its ability to manage the government’s response to disasters. For example, we recommended that FEMA collect information on the status of federal interagency efforts to address issues identified during national emergency-management exercises and actual disasters.
- Federal Funding. FEMA needs to conduct a more comprehensive assessment of a jurisdiction's ability to respond to and recover from a disaster without federal assistance. FEMA is also considering establishing a disaster deductible, which would require a predetermined level of financial or other commitment from a state or local government before FEMA would provide financial assistance under the Public Assistance program.
GAO Disaster Funding Spent as of June 2019
Related GAO Reports
Due to the unprecedented number of disasters in 2017, Congress authorized additional funding to assist states and localities in responding to and recovering from these disasters. Congress also authorized additional funding for federal audit agencies to conduct disaster-specific audits. See FEMA's website for more information on how funds are being spent.
GAO was one of 22 agencies that received these funds. As of June 2019, GAO has spent $8 million out of the $14 million we received, and has issued the following reports:
U.S. Virgin Islands Recovery: Status of FEMA Public Assistance Funding and Implementation
GAO-19-253, Feb 25, 2019
Puerto Rico Hurricanes: Status of FEMA Funding, Oversight, and Recovery Challenges
GAO-19-256, Mar 14, 2019
Disaster Recovery: Better Monitoring of Block Grant Funds Is Needed
GAO-19-232, Mar 25, 2019
Stay tuned—we are currently working on over 25 more.
- Chris Currie
- Director, Homeland Security and Justice