This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-10-797R 
entitled 'Millennium Challenge Corporation: Summary Fact Sheets for 17 
Compacts' which was released on July 14, 2010. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as 
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. 
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data 
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, 
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes 
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, 
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format 
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an 
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your 
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or 
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

GAO-10-797R: 

United States Government Accountability Office: Washington, DC 20548: 

July 14, 2010: 

Congressional Committees: 

Subject: Millennium Challenge Corporation: Summary Fact Sheets for 17 
Compacts: 

The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), now in its seventh year of 
operations, is to provide aid to developing countries that have 
demonstrated a commitment to ruling justly, encouraging economic 
freedom, and investing in people. MCC provides assistance to eligible 
countries through multiyear compact agreements to fund specific 
programs targeted at reducing poverty and stimulating economic growth. 
MCC has received appropriations for fiscal years 2004 through 2010 
totaling about $9.5 billion and has set aside about $8.1 billion of 
this amount for compact assistance. As of June 2010, MCC had signed 
compacts with 20 countries totaling approximately $7.1 billion; of the 
20 compacts, 18 compacts had entered into force, obligating a total of 
approximately $6.3 billion. The President has requested approximately 
$1.3 billion in additional funds for MCC for fiscal year 2011, of 
which MCC plans to use about $1.1 billion for compact assistance to 
countries currently eligible for compacts. 

Enclosed are fact sheets for 17 of the MCC compacts that had entered 
into force as of December 2009.[Footnote 1] The fact sheets summarize 
each country's: 

* general country characteristics and location, 

* timeline of key compact events as of June 2010, 

* per capita income relative to MCC income criteria, 

* performance on MCC's eligibility indicators, 

* compact characteristics and structure, 

* compact funding and project allocations as of December 2009, and: 

* planned and actual compact fund disbursements through December 2009. 
[Footnote 2] 

Scope and Methodology: 

We compiled and summarized data from a number of sources to develop 
these fact sheets, including our previous reporting on MCC, as follows: 

* To provide a general overview of each country's characteristics, we 
used information from the World Bank and from the Central Intelligence 
Agency World Fact Books. 

* To develop timelines of key compact events, we analyzed MCC data 
from its fiscal year 2009 financial report and our previous reporting. 

* To depict countries' income categorization, we compared World Bank 
data on per capita gross national incomes (GNI) with MCC's income 
eligibility thresholds published in its annual candidate country 
reports. 

* To summarize country performance on MCC eligibility indicators, we 
used data from MCC's annual candidate country scorecards and eligible 
country reports. 

* To summarize each compact's characteristics and structure, we 
reviewed and analyzed MCC's compacts, compact summaries, and 
monitoring and evaluation plans at compact signature, and the fiscal 
year 2011 Congressional Budget Justification. These summaries reflect 
the compact structure as of December 2009 and expected beneficiaries 
recalculated as of fiscal year 2009. Expected results are reported as 
of compact signature, however MCC continues to modify expected results 
as projects evolve and as new data becomes available. 

* To analyze compact allocations, disbursements, and commitments, we 
compiled public information from MCC's quarterly reports on compact 
obligations, disbursements, and commitments published in the Federal 
Register and from MCC's quarterly country status reports.[Footnote 3] 
The planned disbursements we report are based on MCC's financial plan 
projections at compact signature and as of December 2009 and on the 
assumption that compact funds are disbursed evenly throughout the 
compact term and implementation year. One country, Mongolia, had a 
major reallocation of funds that MCC approved at the end of 2009; 
however, the reallocations were not implemented until January 2010. 
Although the implementation date for these reallocations was outside 
our scope, we have included information on the reallocations using 
MCC's most current financial plan. 

To clarify and confirm our understanding of this information, we met 
with MCC officials. 

We determined that World Bank gross national income per capita data 
were sufficiently reliable to depict countries' income categorization 
as compared to MCC's eligibility cutoffs. We further determined that 
MCC financial data were sufficiently reliable for our purposes based 
on our review of U.S. Agency for International Development Inspector 
General Audits of MCC's internal controls and financial statements. We 
did not independently assess the reliability of MCC's projections of 
all countries' compact results in this review and have noted this 
accordingly on each fact sheet.[Footnote 4] We conducted our work from 
January 2010 to July 2010 in accordance with sections of GAO's Quality 
Assurance Framework relevant to our objectives. This framework 
requires that we plan and perform the engagement to obtain sufficient 
and appropriate evidence to meet our stated objectives and discuss any 
limitation in our work. We believe that the information and data 
obtained, and the analysis conducted, provide a reasonable basis for 
any findings and conclusions. 

Agency Comments and Our Evaluation: 

We provided a draft of the fact sheets to MCC for review. MCC provided 
written comments about the draft, which we have reproduced in 
enclosure I. Regarding the rate of funds disbursement, MCC stated that 
the pace is, in some cases, slower than projected when the compacts 
were signed. MCC notes that the disbursement lags can be attributed to 
a number of factors, which MCC and the partner countries are 
addressing. Regarding projected compact beneficiaries and results, MCC 
noted that, as a part of its monitoring and evaluation, MCC 
periodically reviews and revises compacts' results and beneficiaries 
in light of evolving project designs or additional data. 

We also received and incorporated as appropriate a number of technical 
comments from MCC. 

We are sending copies of this report to interested congressional 
committees. We will also make copies available to others on request. 
In addition, the report will be available at no charge on GAO's Web 
site at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. If you or your staff have any 
questions or wish to discuss this material further, please contact me 
at (202) 512-3149 or gootnickd@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices 
of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last 
page of this report. Emil Friberg, Jr. (Assistant Director), Miriam 
Carroll Fenton, and Suneeti Shah Vakharia made significant 
contributions to this report. Jena Sinkfield, Etana Finkler, Ernie 
Jackson, Reid Lowe, and Amanda Miller provided technical assistance. 

Signed by: 

David B. Gootnick: 
Director, International Affairs and Trade: 

List of Committees: 

The Honorable John Kerry:
Chairman:
The Honorable Richard Lugar:
Ranking Member:
Committee on Foreign Relations: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Patrick Leahy:
Chairman:
The Honorable Judd Gregg:
Ranking Member:
Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: 
Committee on Appropriations: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Robert Menendez: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Bob Corker:
Ranking Member:
Subcommittee on International Development and Foreign Assistance, 
Economic Affairs, and International Environmental Protection: 
Committee on Foreign Relations: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Howard L. Berman: 
Chairman: The Honorable Ileana Ros-Lehtinen: 
Ranking Member: 
Committee on Foreign Affairs:
House of Representatives: 

The Honorable Nita M. Lowey:
Chairwoman:
The Honorable Kay Granger:
Ranking Member:
Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: 
Committee on Appropriations: 
House of Representatives: 

[End of section] 

Enclosure I: Comments from the Millennium Challenge Corporation: 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: United States of America: 

June 28, 2010: 

Mr. David B. Gootnick: 
Director, International Affairs and Trade: U.S. Government 
Accountability Office: 441 G Street, NW: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

Dear Mr. Gootnick: 

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the GAO report 
entitled "Millennium Challenge Corporation: Summary Fact Sheets for 17 
Compacts Entered into Force." MCC appreciates GAO's summaries of our 
compacts that reduce global poverty through the promotion of 
sustainable economic growth, and wishes to clarify certain points 
regarding the pace of our disbursements as well as the dynamic nature 
of our project evaluation process. 

Compact Disbursement Rates: 

MCC acknowledges that the pace of its disbursements, in some cases, is 
slower than projected by the general financial plans developed when 
individual compacts were signed. These lags are attributed to a number 
of factors being addressed by MCC and our partner countries. 

First, as a result of more project feasibility work being conducted 
during the compact development process, MCC has greater certainty on 
project costs and is therefore able to develop more complete financial 
plans at the time of compact signing. Second, implementing units, 
known as MCAs, are now established and mobilized earlier, allowing 
procurements to begin sooner after compact signature, which in turn 
allows for earlier disbursements. Third, during implementation, MCC 
requires MCAs to update their detailed financial plans on a quarterly 
basis. This process provides MCC with revised quarterly projections 
for the remainder of the compact term; these projections form the 
basis of our annual corporate disbursement and commitment targets. MCC 
makes these targets public and reviews them with various stakeholders. 

These changes have significantly improved MCC's disbursement 
performance against the corporate targets over the past two years 
without compromising its oversight model. Increases in the pace of 
MCC's disbursements has resulted in an increase in the on-the-ground 
work completed which has allowed MCC to begin showing the related 
output and outcome results of its investments. 

Dynamic Evaluation of Expected Beneficiaries & Results: 

As noted in the GAO report, MCC undertook a major effort in December 
2009 to ensure that consistent definitions of beneficiaries are used 
across compacts. This has resulted in updates to a number of the 
project beneficiary estimates. 

MCC periodically reviews compacts' benefits and beneficiaries. MCC 
project designs may evolve or be refined during program 
implementation, and additional data impacting assumptions in the 
economic model may become available. Consequently, projections of 
expected benefits and beneficiaries may also change. MCC provides 
updated estimates in publicly available documents such as monitoring 
and evaluation plans as they are available. 

We have greatly appreciated working with the GAO in the development of 
these documents. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to 
contact me. 

Sincerely Yours, 

Signed by: 

Patrick C. Fine: 
Department of Compact Implementation: 

[End of section] 

Related GAO Products: 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: MCC Has Addressed a Number of 
Implementation Challenges, but Needs to Improve Financial Controls and 
Infrastructure Planning. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-
10-52]. Washington, D.C.: November 6, 2009. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Summary Fact Sheets for 11 Compacts 
Entered into Force. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-
1145R]. Washington, D.C.: September 26, 2008. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Independent Reviews and Consistent 
Approaches Will Strengthen Projections of Program Impact. [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-730]. Washington, D.C.: June 17, 
2008. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Analysis of Compact Development and 
Future Obligations and Current Disbursements of Compact Assistance. 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-577R]. Washington, 
D.C.: April 11, 2008. 

Management Letter: Recommendations for Improvements to MCC's Internal 
Controls and Policies on Premium Class Air Travel. [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-468R]. Washington, D.C.: February 
29, 2008. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Projected Impact of Vanuatu Compact 
Is Overstated. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-1122T]. 
Washington, D.C.: July 26, 2007. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Vanuatu Compact Overstates Projected 
Program Impact. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-909]. 
Washington, D.C.: July 11, 2007. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Progress and Challenges with 
Compacts in Africa. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-
1049T]. Washington, D.C.: June 28, 2007. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Compact Implementation Structures 
Are Being Established; Framework for Measuring Results Needs 
Improvement. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-805]. 
Washington, D.C.: July 28, 2006. 

Analysis of Future Millennium Challenge Corporation Obligations. 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-466R]. Washington, 
D.C.: February 21, 2006. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Progress Made on Key Challenges in 
First Year of Operations. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-
05-625T]. Washington, D.C.: April 27, 2005. 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Progress Made on Key Challenges in 
First Year of Operations. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-
05-455T]. Washington, D.C.: April 26, 2005. 

[End of section] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Armenia Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in the Caucasus region of Asia, Armenia has a population of 
about 3.1 million. It is a lower-middle-income country. Its economy is 
based primarily on services and industry, which respectively 
constitute 48 and 34 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP). 
Agriculture constitutes 19 percent of GDP but employs about 46 percent 
of the labor force. After the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, 
Armenia implemented some economic reforms, but geographic isolation, a 
narrow export base, and monopolies in important business sectors made 
it vulnerable to the deterioration in the global economy. After 
several years of high economic growth, Armenia faced an economic 
recession, with GDP declining by at least 15 percent in 2009. Its 
economy is further challenged by high transportation costs. The 
country is landlocked, and its borders with Azerbaijan and Turkey have 
been closed since the early 1990s. 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact's terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC's 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Armenia was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 75 percent of the 
compact's 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Map of Armenia: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Armenia in the 
Middle East] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Figure: Key Events for Armenia Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2006: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
March 27, 2006: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2006-2011: 
September 29, 2006: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 75%); 
September 28, 2011: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries--low-income and lower-
middle-income--based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Armenia was classified as a low-income country from 2004 through 2007. 
In 2008, Armenia's rising GNI per capita lifted it to lower-middle-
income status. 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC's board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate's 
policy performance. To meet MCC's criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it--
even if it fails the criteria--as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country's policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Armenia met MCC's eligibility criteria each year from 2004 through 
2007 as a low-income country. In 2008, it rose to lower-middle-income 
status and each year since then has failed to meet the criteria for 
that group. 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

Figure: Armenia GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $570; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $950; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,120; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,470; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,930; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,640; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $3,350; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

Table: Armenia's Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
MCC income group: Low: Passed; MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
MCC income group: Low: Passed; MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
MCC income group: Low: Passed; MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
MCC income group: Low: Passed; MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; MCC 
eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Armenia: Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Armenia's compact focused on reducing rural poverty by 
increasing the agricultural sector's economic performance. At that 
time, more than 1 million Armenians (35 percent of the population) 
were dependent on semisubsistence agriculture. In June 2009, MCC put a 
hold on funding for the Rural Road Rehabilitation Project because of 
concerns about the status of democratic governance in Armenia. MCC 
will not resume funding for any future road construction under the 
compact. MCC also rescoped the Irrigated Agriculture Project. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC's expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

The Armenia compact is one of five compacts for which GAO has 
independently verified the reliability of MCC's result projections. In 
June 2008, GAO reported that MCC made analytic errors in its original 
projections of the Armenia compact's impact. Correcting these errors 
reduces MCC's expected impact on income in rural areas and on poverty 
(GAO-08-730). 

MCC has modified the Armenia compact but only partially recalculated 
the expected results. 

Figure: Structure of Armenia Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 

Poor transportation infrastructure and an underdeveloped agricultural 
economy constrain rural development. 

Planned Project: Rural Road Rehabilitation; 
* Rehabilitate up to 943 km of rural roads, 45 percent of the proposed 
lifeline road network. (Hold on funding) MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Reduced rural transport costs by an estimated $20 million annually, 
beginning 5 years after project completion; 
* Will benefit rural Armenians living in 265 communities connected to 
the rehabilitated roads; Increased incomes for approximately 428,000 
Armenians[B]. 

Planned Project: Irrigated Agriculture; 
* Rehabilitate up to 31 (previously 99) irrigation infrastructure 
projects to increase the area of irrigated land; 
* Provide technical and rural credit assistance to build water 
management capacity and support transition to higher-value crops. MCC 
Expected Results[A]: 
* Total area of land under irrigation production increased by 
approximately 40 percent; 
* Average net incomes of over 60,000 farmers increased by 
approximately 25 percent; Increased incomes for approximately 428,000 
Armenians[B]. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. The hold on 
funding for the Rural Road Rehabilitation Project may affect results. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit approximately 750,000 people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (March 2006), MCC obligated $235.6 million for the 
Armenia compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount 
had not changed, however, nearly $7 million had been reallocated from 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation funds to the 
Irrigated Agriculture Project. In addition, because MCC put a hold on 
funding for the Rural Road Rehabilitation Project, approximately $59.0 
million of compact funds will not be disbursed or reallocated. 

Figure: Armenia Compact Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $235.6 million: 
Irrigated Agriculture ($145.7 million) 62%; 
Rural Road Rehabilitation ($67.1 million) 28%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($22.9 million) 
10%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $235.7 million: 
Irrigated Agriculture ($152.6 million) 65%; 
Rural Road Rehabilitation ($67.1 million) 28% (hold on remaining 
funding); 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($15.9 million) 
7%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: The difference in total compact funds allocated at compact 
signature and as of December 2009 is due to rounding. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $54.0 million (approximately 23 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $153.4 million 
(approximately 65 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $80.8 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Armenia Compact Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $235.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $235.7 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $153.4 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $54.0 million. 

Rural Road Rehabilitation (hold on remaining funding): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $67.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $67.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $43.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $7.9 million. 

Irrigated Agriculture: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $145.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $152.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $99.4 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $35.4 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $22.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $15.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $10.4 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.7 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Armenia Compact Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Benin Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in coastal West Africa, Benin has a population of 
approximately 8.7 million. It is a low-income country. Its economy is 
based on services, which constitute 52 percent of its gross domestic 
product; industry and agriculture constitute another 15 and 33 
percent, respectively. The economy has experienced some positive 
growth in the last few years, with the real economic growth rate 
averaging 4.2 percent from 2007 through 2009. However, the global 
economic slowdown has negatively affected Benin's growth. The current 
government, which entered office in 2006, has emphasized efforts to 
fight corruption and accelerate Benin's economic growth. 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact's terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC's 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Benin was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its first 
eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 75 percent of the compact's 5- 
year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Map of Benin: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Benin within 
Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Figure: Key Events for Benin Compact: 

Compact development: 2004-2006: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
February 22, 2006: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2006-2011: 
October 6, 2006: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 75%); 
October 5, 2011: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries--low-income and lower-
middle-income--based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Benin has been classified as a low-income country every year since MCC 
began operations in 2004. 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC's board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate's 
policy performance. To meet MCC's criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the Board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it--
even if it fails the criteria--as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country's policy performance 
declines, the Board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Benin met MCC's eligibility criteria in 2004 through 2006. In 2007 
through 2009, it did not meet the criteria because it either failed 
the corruption indicator or more than three Investing in People 
indicators. Benin met all criteria in 2010. 

Figure: Benin GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $380; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $440; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $530; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; MCC cutoff off for 
lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $510; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $540; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $570; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $690; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

Table: Benin's Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Benin's compact aimed to improve core physical and 
institutional infrastructure and increase private sector activity and 
investment. At that time, one-third of Benin residents lived in 
poverty; 1 percent of Benin households held a formal title to land, 
with a majority of the rural population relying on oral customary land 
rights; and only a small fraction of the population owned a bank 
account. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC's expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC's results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Benin Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Poor physical and institutional infrastructure constrains investment 
and private sector activity. 

Planned Project: Access to Land; 
* Support government reforms to establish land policy; 
* Provide citizens with more secure and useful records of their land 
rights; 
* Upgrade and decentralize title registration services in 24 communes; 
* Help design, equip, and staff new local land registry; 
* Support land reform steering and working groups; 
MCC Expected Result[A]: 
* Secure tenure and affordable access to land information for 
approximately 115,000 households, a 50 percent decrease in land 
dispute cases, and up to 20 percent increase in investments. 

Planned Project: Access to Financial Services; 
* Conduct business demand and feasibility assessments and establish a 
financial innovation and challenge facility that provides technical 
assistance to financial institutions and businesses; 
* Support legal and policy changes to expand financial sector; 
MCC Expected Result[A]: 
* Increased access to more financial services for poor individuals, 
particularly women. 

Planned Project: Access to Justice; 
* Support expansion of dispute resolution center in Chamber of 
Commerce; 
* Invest in existing and new business registration centers to improve 
the business registration process; 
* Improve court services through training for judges and court 
personnel, a legal information center, new courthouses, and a public 
awareness campaign; 
MCC Expected Result[A]: 
* Improved capacity of courts to resolve commercial cases. 

Planned Project: Access to Markets; 
* Improve the Port of Cotonou’s infrastructure to increase efficiency 
and the volume of goods flowing through the port and to reduce vehicle 
operating costs; 
MCC Expected Result[A]: 
* Improved quality of transportation and fish processing facilities 
for importers, exporters and consumers. 

Overall MCC Expected result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 13.4 million Beninese[B]. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit approximately 5 million people. 

[End of table] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (February 2006), MCC obligated $307.3 million for the 
Benin compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount and 
project allocations had not changed. 

Figure: Benin Compact Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $307.3 million: 
Access to Markets ($169.4 million) 55%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($47.9 million) 
16%; 
Access to Land ($36.0 million) 12%; 
Access to Justice ($34.3 million) 11%; 
Access to Financial Services ($19.7 million) 6%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $307.3 million: 
Access to Markets ($169.4 million) 55%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($47.9 million) 
16%; 
Access to Land ($36.0 million) 12%; 
Access to Justice ($34.3 million) 11%; 
Access to Financial Services ($19.7 million) 6%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $66.3 million (approximately 22 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $215.1 million (70 
percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $139.3 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Benin Compact Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $307.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $307.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $215.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $66.3 million. 

Access to Financial Services: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $19.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $19.7 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $15.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $3.3 million. 

Access to Justice: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $34.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $34.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $22.4 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.9 million. 

Access to Markets: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $169.4 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $169.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $120.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $27.4 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $47.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $47.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $31.8 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $20.8 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Benin Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Burkina Faso Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in West Africa, Burkina Faso is a land-locked country with a 
population of approximately 15.2 million. It is a low-income country. 
Its economy is based on services and industry, which respectively 
constitute about 50 and 30 percent of its gross domestic product 
(GDP). Agriculture constitutes 30 percent of GDP but employs 90 
percent of the labor force. Burkina Faso has undertaken several broad 
macroeconomic reforms since the mid-1990s, including market-oriented 
reforms, decentralization of power, adoption of a new labor code, and 
business climate improvements. However, Burkina Faso continues to face 
severe constraints to growth and poverty reduction. Burkina Faso’s GDP 
grew by about 5.2 percent in 2009. 

Figure: Map of Burkina Faso: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Burkina Faso 
within Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Burkina Faso was first selected as eligible in fiscal year 2006, MCC’s 
third eligibility round for low-income countries. As of June 30, 2010, 
18 percent of the compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Burkina Faso Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2005-2009: 
November 8, 2005: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
July 14, 2008: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2006-2011: 
July 31,2009: Compact enters into force, implementation begins; 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 18%); 
July 30, 2014: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Burkina Faso was selected as eligible in fiscal year 2006 and has been 
classified as a low-income country ever since. 

Figure: Burkina Faso GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $220; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $300; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $360; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $400; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $460; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $430; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $480; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Burkina Faso became eligible in 2006 and met MCC’s eligibility 
criteria each year from 2006 through 2009. It did not meet the 
criteria in 2010 because it failed three of the five Investing in 
People indicators. 

Table: Burkina Faso’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Not Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Not Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

Burkina Faso’s compact targets rural areas, which, according to MCC, 
are home to 95 percent of the country’s poor. Many of the compact 
projects are focused in Boucle de Mouhoun, the third poorest of 
Burkina Faso’s 13 regions. In addition, a small number of projects 
focus on the Comoé region. At compact signature, Burkina Faso was one 
of the poorest countries in the world. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Burkina Faso Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Weak rural property rights, low agricultural productivity, and poor 
roads constrain economic growth. 

Planned Project: Rural Land Governance; 
* Provide technical advice regarding rural land legislation; 
* Improve institutional capacity to deliver rural land service; 
* Support land use management planning in up to 47 municipalities, and 
clarify rights in up to eight agricultural projects, one irrigation 
project, and 14,500 land parcels in the Ganzourgou province; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Up to 415,200 households will have access to local land registration 
and titling services. 

Planned Project: Agricultural Development; 
8 Ensure adequate water availability, water delivery, flood control, 
and dam safety to support investments through water management 
activities and development of irrigation projects; 
* Diversify agriculture through technical assistance, rehabilitation 
of district markets, and improved veterinary services; 
* Increase access to rural finance through medium- and long-term 
credit in four western regions; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved agricultural and livestock production conditions, water 
management, and access to credit for up to 150,000 individuals. 

Planned Project: Roads; 
* Improve three primary road segments projected to total 271 km in 
western Burkina Faso; 
* Improve rural road segments projected to total 151 km in 
southwestern Burkina Faso; 
* Provide technical assistance regarding road maintenance; 
* Provide incentive for road maintenance by matching government 
funding; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved access to markets and health and education facilities and 
improved ability to trade with neighboring countries. 

Planned Project: BRIGHT 2 Schools; 
* Construct or rehabilitate up to 50 potable water sources; 
* Construct school facilities in 132 communities; 
* Construct 122 kindergartens and provide daily meals for enrolled 
children; 
* Provide monthly rations for girls demonstrating good attendance; 
* Develop campaigns to support education; 
* Support adult literacy in 132 communities; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improve educational for up to 19,800 children, including 9,900 girls. 

Overall MCC Expected Results[A]: 
Increase incomes for approximately 1.2 million Burkinabe.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. MCC did not publish a 
beneficiary estimate for Burkina Faso at compact signature. 

[End of table] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (July 2008), MCC obligated $480.9 million for the Burkina 
Faso compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount and 
project allocations had not changed. 

Figure: Burkina Faso Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $480.9 million: 
Roads ($194.1 million) 40%; 
Agriculture Development ($141.9 million) 30%; 
Rural Land Governance ($59.9 million) 12%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($56.1 million) 
12%; 
BRIGHT 2 Schools ($28.8 million) 6%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $480.9 million: 
Roads ($194.1 million) 40%; 
Agriculture Development ($141.9 million) 30%; 
Rural Land Governance ($59.9 million) 12%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($56.1 million) 
12%; 
BRIGHT 2 Schools ($28.8 million) 6%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming.
As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $34.2 million (approximately 7 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $34.2 million 
(approximately 7 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $48.6 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Burkina Faso Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $480.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $480.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $34.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $34.2 million. 

BRIGHT 2 Schools: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $28.8 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $28.8 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $10.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $26.8 million. 

Rural Land Governance: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $59.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $59.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $3.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.5 million. 

Agricultural Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $141.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $141.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $10.3 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million. 

Roads: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $194.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $194.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $2.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $56.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $56.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $6.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $6.8 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Burkina Faso Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Cape Verde Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located off the coast of West Africa, Cape Verde is a group of 10 
islands with a population of about 500,000. It is a lower-middle-
income country. Its economy is heavily based on services, which 
constitute 74 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP); industry 
and agriculture constitute 17 and 9 percent of GDP, respectively. Its 
economy suffers from a poor natural resource base and relies heavily 
on foreign assistance and remittances. Cape Verde is considered one of 
Africa’s most stable democracies and, despite its economic challenges, 
has experienced economic growth, a reduction of poverty, and increases 
in access to education and health care. Cape Verde is the first 
country eligible for a second MCC compact. 

Figure: Map of Cape Verde: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Cape Verde 
along the west coast of Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Cape Verde was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. It was the third country to begin 
implementing a compact. As of June 30, 2010, 94 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Cape Verde Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2005: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
July 4, 2005: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2005-2010: 
October 17, 2005: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 94%); 
October 16, 2010: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, candidate 
country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. assistance. 
By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance each year 
for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Cape Verde was a low-income country in 2004. It was not a candidate in 
2005 because its GNI rose above the low-income cut-off. Since 2006, 
Cape Verde has been a lower-middle-income country. 

Figure: Cape Verde GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,340; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,490[A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,770; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,870; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,130; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,430; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $3,130; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[A] Cape Verde was not a candidate for assistance in 2005 because it 
surpassed the cut-off for low-income candidates. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it-—
even if it fails the criteria—-as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Cape Verde met MCC’s eligibility criteria in 2004 as a low-income 
country. In 2005, it rose to lower-middle-income status and was not a 
candidate. In 2006, it failed the indicators for its group and did not 
meet the criteria again until 2010. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Cape Verde was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Not Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Not 
Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Cape Verde’s compact focused on water and infrastructure 
projects on four islands. Compact funds support the upgrade and 
expansion of the Port of Praia, which is Cape Verde’s busiest port and 
handles half of the country’s cargo. At signature, 10 percent of Cape 
Verde’s land was arable, and agricultural productivity was low; 
approximately 85 percent of food was imported (70 percent in the form 
of food aid). In May 2008, MCC restructured the Cape Verde compact in 
response to project rescoping, increased input costs, and currency 
fluctuations. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009.
GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Cape Verde Compact, as of December 2009: 

Constraints to Development: 
Water scarcity, lack of adequate infrastructure, weak institutional 
support for the private sector, and an insufficiently trained 
workforce constrain economic growth. 

Planned Projects: Watershed Management and Agriculture Support; 
* Develop water management infrastructure, including walls, terrace, 
dikes, and reservoirs; 
* Promote drip irrigation technology and increase productive capacity 
and marketing of agricultural products among farmers and small 
agribusinesses; 
* Provide access to credit for drip irrigation, working capital, and 
agribusiness investments; increase the capacity of financial 
institutions through technical assistance; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased access to water and agribusiness development services for 
70,000 people. 

Planned Projects: Infrastructure; 
* Upgrade and expand the Port of Praia; 
* Improve transportation infrastructure on the islands of Santiago and 
Santo Antão, including reconstruction of five roads totaling 64 km and 
construction of several bridges; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Reduced transportation costs for over 60,000 people on Santiago and 
Santa Antão islands, including importers, exporters, shippers and 
consumers. 

Planned Projects: Private Sector Development; 
* Collaborate with the government and World Bank to identify, 
prioritize, design, and implement interventions to increase investment 
in priority sectors of the economy; 
* Provide technical assistance to support the development of 
microfinance institutions and government efforts to expand access to 
the primary market for government securities; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved investment climate and increased employment and 
entrepreneurial opportunities. 

Overall MCC Expected Results[A]: 
Increased incomes for approximately 385,000 Cape Verdeans.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. b In fiscal year 
2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected beneficiaries using a 
standardized methodology. MCC did not publish a beneficiary estimate 
for Cape Verde at compact signature. 

[End of table] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (July 2005), MCC obligated $110.1 million for the Cape 
Verde compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount had 
not changed, however over $4 million was reallocated from the Private 
Sector Development Project to the Infrastructure Project. 

Figure: Cape Verde Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $110.1 million: 
Infrastructure ($78.8 million) 72%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($13.3 million) 
12%; 
Watershed Management and Agricultural Support ($10.8 million) 10%; 
Private Sector Development ($7.2 million) 7%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $110.1 million: 
Infrastructure ($83.2 million) 76%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($13.8 million) 
13%; 
Watershed Management and Agricultural Support ($11.0 million) 10%; 
Private Sector Development ($2.1 million) 2%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: Project allocations in figures may not add up to 100 percent due 
to rounding. 

[End of figure] 

Figure: Cape Verde Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $110.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $110.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $92.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $69.1 million. 

Private Sector Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $7.2 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $2.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $1.8 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.2 million. 

Watershed and Agricultural Support: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $10.8 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $11.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $9.3 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $8.1 million. 

Infrastructure: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $78.8 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $83.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $70.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $49.1 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $13.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $131.8 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $11.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.2 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Cape Verde Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: El Salvador Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in Central America, El Salvador has a population of about
6.1 million. It is a lower-middle-income country. Its economy is 
largely based on services, which constitute an estimated 61 percent of
its gross domestic product (GDP) and employ about 58 percent of the
labor force. Industry and agriculture constitute 28 and 11 percent of 
GDP, respectively. A 12-year civil war that ended in 1992 left nearly 
two-thirds of the country’s population in poverty. During the war, 
public investment was deferred and deterioration of the natural resource
base accelerated. Despite a strong record of economic reform, El
Salvador’s economic growth has been modest in recent years and
contracted by 2.6 percent in 2009. 

Figure: Map of El Salvador: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of El Salvador 
within Central America] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. El Salvador was one 
of two lower-middle-income countries selected in the fiscal year 2006 
eligibility round, the first year of MCC’s program for lower-middle-
income countries. 

El Salvador was the first lower-middle-income country to begin
implementing a compact. As of June 30, 2010, 56 percent of the compact’s
5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for El Salvador Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2005-2007: 
November 8, 2008: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
November 29, 2006: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2007-2012: 
September 20, 2007: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 56%); 
September 19, 2012: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

El Salvador became a candidate for MCC assistance in 2006, the first 
year that MCC considered lower-middle-income countries. 

Figure: El Salvador GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): [A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): [A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,350; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,450; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,540; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,850; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $3,480; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[A] El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004 and 2005. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

El Salvador met MCC’s eligibility criteria in 2006 and 2007. It did 
not meet the criteria in 2008, 2009, or 2010 because it failed three 
or more of the five Investing in People indicators. 

Table: El Salvador’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; El Salvador was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Not eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Not eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, El Salvador’s compact focused on developing the economy 
of the country's Northern Zone, where, according to the MCC compact at 
signature, nearly 20 percent of El Salvador’s poor lived. At that 
time, significant numbers of the poor lacked access to basic public 
services and less than 10 percent of children completed secondary 
school. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009.
The El Salvador compact is one of five compacts for which GAO has 
independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results projections. 
In June 2008, GAO reported that MCC had made errors in its original 
projections of the impact of El Salvador’s compact (GAO-08-730). MCC 
corrected these errors, reducing the expected impact on poverty and 
income. For example, MCC originally projected that beneficiaries’ per 
capita income would increase by $148.0 but now projects an increase of 
$123.0. 

Figure: Structure of El Salvador Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Poor infrastructure, limited education resources, and low agricultural 
production constrain regional development in the Northern Zone. 

Planned Project: Human Development: 
* Expand the quality of and access to vocational and technical 
education and training for poor people in the Northern Zone; 
* Increase access for poor people in the Northern Zone to basic public 
services and infrastructure; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Access to formal and informal training for over 27,000 individuals, 
basic public services for 65,000 households, and greater access for 
over 130,000 people to markets, employment and facilities supporting 
health and education. 

Planned Project: Productive Development: 
* Technical assistance to poor farmers to shift to high-value 
agricultural production; preinvestment studies and technical 
assistance to implement business plans in the Northern Zone; 
* Provide investment capital for business development benefiting the 
poor in the Northern Zone; 
* Provide credit guarantees and technical assistance to lenders and 
agricultural insurance to farmers to promote lending activity in rural 
areas; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* New or expanded market opportunities for agribusinesses and other 
enterprises, and increased net incomes for 55,000 people employed in 
agriculture or nonfarm activities. 

Planned Project: Connectivity: 
* Design, construct, and rehabilitate the 290 km of the Northern 
Transnational Highway; 
* Improve 240 km of connecting roads; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* New economic opportunities for rural households, lower 
transportation costs, and decreased travel times to markets and social 
service delivery points. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 901,000 El Salvadorans.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit at least 1 million people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (November 2006), MCC obligated $460.9 million for the El 
Salvador compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount 
had not changed, however minor funding reallocations were made. 

Figure: El Salvador Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $460.9 million: 
Connectivity ($233.6 million) 51%; 
Human Development ($95.1 million) 21%; 
Productive Development ($87.5 million) 19%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($44.9 million) 
10%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $460.9 million: 
Connectivity ($233.6 million) 51%; 
Human Development ($95.1 million) 21%; 
Productive Development ($87.5 million) 19%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($44.9 million) 
10%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: Project allocations in figures may not add up to 100 percent due 
to rounding. 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming.
As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $66.1 million (approximately 14 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $222.9 million 
(approximately 48 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $135.4 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: El Salvador Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $460.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $460.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $222.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $66.1 million. 

Productive Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $87.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $87.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $37.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $20.0 million. 

Human Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $95.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $95.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $35.5 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $11.7 million. 

Connectivity: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $233.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $233.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $129.8 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $22.1 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $44.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $44.7 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $19.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $12.4 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of El Salvador Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Georgia Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in the Caucasus region of Asia on the southern border of 
Russia, Georgia has a population of about 4.4 million. It is a lower-
middle-income country. Its economy is based on services and industry, 
which respectively constitute 62 and 26 percent of its gross domestic 
product (GDP). Agriculture constitutes 12 percent of GDP but employs 
56 percent of the labor force. Other key economic activities include 
mining of manganese and copper. Following the “Rose Revolution”—
widespread protests that led to its president’s resignation—-Georgia 
elected a new government in 2004 that focused on anticorruption 
efforts and other reforms. In August 2008, conflict erupted with 
Russia over regions in Georgia seeking independence. Although Georgia’
s GDP had been growing, the conflict and the global economic crisis 
negatively impacted its economy, which contracted by nearly 5 percent 
in 2009. 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Georgia was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 85 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Map of Georgia: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Georgia in 
Eastern Europe] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Figure: Key Events for Georgia Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2006: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
September 12, 2005: Compact enters into force. 

Compact Implementation: 2006-2011: 
April 7, 2006: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 85%); 
April 6, 2011: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI)
data to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income
and lower-middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, 
a candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving
U.S. assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact
assistance each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income
countries. 

Georgia was a low-income candidate country from 2004 through 2008. In 
2009, Georgia’s rising GNI per capita lifted it to lower-middle-income 
status. 

Figure: Georgia GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $590; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $830; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,040; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,350; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,560; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,120; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,470; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it-—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Georgia failed MCC’s eligibility criteria in 2004, 2005, and 2006, in 
part because it failed the corruption indicator, but the MCC board
deemed it eligible. It met the criteria in 2007 and 2008. In 2009,
Georgia became lower-middle-income and failed the criteria for that 
group that year and in 2010. 

Table: Georgia’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed;. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Georgia’s compact aimed to stimulate growth in regions 
outside the capital, Tbilisi, with a particular emphasis on the 
Samtskhe-Javakheti region in southwestern Georgia. At that time, these 
regions were collectively home to more than 40 percent of the country’
s total population. The compact includes plans to rehabilitate key 
infrastructure. In addition, the compact includes plans to invest in, 
and provide technical assistance to, regional enterprises. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact projects’ 
expected results. (See GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Georgia Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Poor infrastructure, low management capacity, and limited access to 
credit impede enterprise development and economic growth. 

Planned Project: Regional Infrastructure Rehabilitation: 
* Rehabilitate and construct 245 km of main roads in the Samtskhe-
Javakheti region; 
* Rehabilitate the North-South gas pipeline and advise the Ministry of 
Energy on an energy sector plan; 
* Provide grants to fund regional and municipal infrastructure such as 
water supply, sanitation, irrigation, municipal gasification, roads, 
and waste; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Enhanced agricultural and trade opportunities and improved access to 
education, health care, and employment; 
* Reduced greenhouse gas emission and improved health and safety of 
the population and improved access to basic public services. 

Planned Project: Enterprise Development: 
* Develop a regional investment fund to provide capital, provide 
technical assistance to enterprises, and identify legal and policy 
reforms to encourage investment; 
* Provide technical assistance and grants and disseminate market 
information to help farmers transition from subsistence to commercial 
agriculture; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased annual household income by approximately $37 million and 
business revenues by approximately $27 million. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 4.6 million Georgians.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit nearly 500,000 people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (September 2005), MCC obligated $295.3 million for the 
Georgia compact. In addition to previous reallocations, MCC and 
Georgia amended the compact in November 2008, increasing the total 
compact amount to $395.3 million to complete works originally 
envisioned in the compact. 

Figure: Georgia Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $295.3 million: 
Regional Infrastructure Rehabilitation ($211.7 million) 72%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($36.1 million) 
12%; 
Enterprise Development ($47.5 million) 16%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $395.3 million: 
Regional Infrastructure Rehabilitation ($310.8 million) 79%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($52.2 million) 
13%; 
Enterprise Development ($32.4 million) 8%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $191.1 million (approximately 
48 percent) of compact funds, compared with the $295.3 million 
(approximately 75 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $143.3 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Georgia Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $295.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $395.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $293.3 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $191.1 million. 

Enterprise Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $47.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $52.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $39.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $38.4 million. 

Regional Infrastructure Rehabilitation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $211.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $310.8 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $232.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $136.6 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $36.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $32.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $24.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $16.1 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Georgia Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Ghana Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in coastal West Africa, Ghana has a population of 23.9 
million. It is a low-income country. Its economy is distributed among 
the services, agriculture, and industry sectors, which respectively 
account for 38, 37 and 25 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP). 
However, agriculture employs about 56 percent of the labor force. 
Despite an abundance of natural resources, Ghana remains heavily 
dependent on international financial and technical assistance. Ghana 
experienced consistent economic growth over the last decade, with real 
GDP growth rising from 3.7 percent in 2000 to 7.3 percent in 2008; GDP 
growth slowed to 4.7 percent in 2009. 

Figure: Map of Ghana: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Ghana within 
Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Ghana was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its first 
eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 67 percent of the compact’s 5-
year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Ghana Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2006: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
August 1, 2006: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2007-2012: 
February 16, 2006: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 67%); 
February 15, 2012: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries.
Ghana has been classified as a low-income candidate country every year 
since MCC began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Ghana GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $290; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $320; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $380; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $450; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $520; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $590; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $670; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Ghana has met MCC’s eligibility criteria each year since 2004, except 
in 2007, when it failed four of six Economic Freedom indicators. 

Table: Ghana’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Ghana’s compact focused on 23 districts in the Afram 
Basin region, in the north, and on the southern agricultural area of 
the Southeast region. At that time, poverty rates in these locations 
were generally higher than 40 percent. In January 2009, MCC 
restructured the Ghana compact to respond to farmer demand for 
services and to increased project costs. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Ghana Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Inconsistent supply and quality of agriculture crops, high 
transportation costs, and insufficient access to basic services hinder 
growth. 

Planned Project: Agriculture: 
* Develop commercial skills and capacity among farmer-based 
organizations and business partners; 
* Develop a limited number of retention ponds and weirs for irrigation; 
* Improve land tenure security and access to land for high-value 
agriculture; 
* Facilitate investments and access to credit for post-harvest 
infrastructure; 
* Rehabilitate up to 950 km of feeder roads in 8 districts; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* 51,000 farm households trained in commercial skills, improved 
operation of approximately 120 enterprises, and road improvements for 
over 120,000 households. 

Planned Project: Transportation: 
* Upgrade 14 km of the National Highway between the cities of Accra 
and Tema; 
* Improve 230 km of trunk roads in the Afram Basin region; 
* Improve Lake Volta ferry services that connect the north and south 
shores; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Decreased transportation costs for approximately 150,000 daily users. 

Planned Project: Rural Development: 
* Strengthen the public sector procurement capacity; 
* Construct and rehabilitate educational, water, and sanitation 
facilities and expand access to electricity in rural areas; 
* Automate and interconnect 121 rural banks and improve the national 
payments system; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Decreased incidence of disease and time spent collecting water, and 
increased school attendance and productivity; 
* Improved access to financial services and public sector performance. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 1.2 million Ghanaians.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit over 1 million people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (August 2006), MCC obligated $547.0 million for the Ghana 
compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount had not 
changed, however funds were reallocated among the projects. 

Figure: Ghana Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $547.0 million: 
Agriculture ($241.0 million) 44%; 
Transportation ($143.1 million) 26%; 
Rural Development ($101.3 million) 19%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($61.6 million) 
11%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $547.0 million: 
Agriculture ($227.9 million) 42%; 
Transportation ($174.3 million) 32%; 
Rural Development ($89.4 million) 16%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($55.5 million) 
10%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $123.2 million (approximately 
23 percent) of compact funds, compared with the $314.2 million 
(approximately 57 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $216.7 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Georgia Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $547.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $547.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $314.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $123.2 million. 

Rural Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $101.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $89.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $51.3 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $12.6 million. 

Transportation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $143.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $174.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $100.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $29.1 million. 

Agriculture: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $241.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $227.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $130.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $60.9 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $61.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $55.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $31.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $19.2 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Ghana Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Honduras Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in Central America, Honduras has a population of about 7.2 
million. It is a low-income country. Its economy is based on services, 
which constitute 58 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) and 
employ about 40 percent of the labor force. Industry and agriculture 
constitute 28 and 14 percent of GDP, respectively. Honduras’s real GDP 
contracted in 2009 by 3.1 percent. In June 2009, Honduran President 
Zelaya was ousted from office after attempting to change the 
constitution to allow for his re-election, which the Honduran congress 
and judiciary strongly opposed. As a result of this situation, MCC has 
partially terminated assistance under its compact with Honduras. 

Figure: Map of Honduras: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Honduras 
within Central America] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Honduras was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. Honduras was the second country to begin 
implementing a compact with MCC. As of June 30, 2010, 95 percent of 
the compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Honduras Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2005: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
June 13, 2005: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2005-2010: 
September 29, 2005: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 95%); 
September 28, 2010: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Honduras has been classified as a low-income country every year since 
MCC began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Honduras GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $900; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $970; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,030; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,190; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,200; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,600; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,800; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the Board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the Board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Honduras met MCC’s eligibility criteria most years since 2004. It did 
not meet the criteria in 2008 and 2010 because it failed the 
corruption indicator. 

Table: Honduras’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, the Honduras compact aimed to generate economic growth 
in rural areas. In September 2009, MCC partially terminated assistance 
under its compact with Honduras, ceasing to fund parts of the 
Transportation and Rural Development Projects. MCC also placed a hold 
on funding for a section of the CA-5 Highway Activity, under the 
Transportation Project; the hold on funding was lifted in early 2010. 
MCC acted in response to the Honduran president’s removal and the 
failure to reestablish democratic order, which were inconsistent with 
MCC’s eligibility criteria. 

Expected Results: 

The graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results at 
compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

MCC has modified the Honduras compact but only partially recalculated 
the expected results. 

Figure: Structure of Honduras Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Low agricultural productivity and high transportation costs impede 
economic growth. 

Planned Project: Rural Development: 
* Provide technical assistance to transition 7,340 farmers (previously 
8,255) to high-value crops; 
* Provide technical assistance and loans to financial institutions; 
* Support adaptation of technological advances to Honduran agriculture; 
* Upgrade 493 km (previously 1,500 km) of rural roads to connect 
farmers to markets (partially terminated); 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved business skills, productivity, market access and risk 
management practices of producers who operate small- and medium-size 
farms. 

Planned Project: Transportation: 
* Pave and upgrade 68 km (previously 90 km) of secondary roads; 
* Upgrade and pave 105 km of the CA-5 highway. (Activities resumed in 
2010); (partially terminated); 
* Develop a vehicle weight control system and build 8 weight stations 
to help preserve upgraded roads (partially terminated); 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Reduced transportation costs between targeted production centers and 
national, regional, and global markets, stimulating economic growth. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 1.8 million Hondurans.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. The partial 
termination of the two projects may affect results. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. MCC did not publish a 
beneficiary estimate for Honduras at compact signature. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (June 2005), MCC obligated $215.0 million for the 
Honduras compact. In September 2009, MCC terminated part of the 
compact assistance, representing about $10.0 million, and put a hold 
on funding for another part of the compact. As of December 2009, the 
overall obligation had decreased to $205.0 million. 

Figure: Honduras Compact Funding: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $215.0 million: 
Transportation ($125.7 million) 58%; 
Rural Development ($72.2 million) 34%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($17.1 million) 
8%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $205.0 million: 
Transportation ($119.0 million) 58%; 
Rural Development ($69.9 million) 34%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($16.1 million) 
8%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $132.1 million (approximately 
65 percent) of compact funds, compared with the $174.4 million 
(approximately 85 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $60.4 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Honduras Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $215.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $205.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $174.4 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $132.1 million. 

Rural Development (partially terminated): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $72.2 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $69.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $59.5 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $45.7 million. 

Transportation (partially terminated): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $125.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $119.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $101.3 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $75.9 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $17.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $16.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $13.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.0 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Honduras Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Lesotho Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in southern Africa, Lesotho is a landlocked country, 
surrounded by South Africa, with a population of about 2.0 million. It 
is considered a low-income country. Its economy is based on industry 
and services, which respectively account for 45 and 39 percent of 
Lesotho’s gross domestic product (GDP). Agriculture accounts for 16 
percent of GDP but employs 86 percent of the labor force. However, 
about 35 percent of Lesotho’s male wage earners work in South Africa. 
In recent years, the government of Lesotho has embarked on major 
reforms to remove impediments to private sector growth, improve access 
to credit, and increase the participation of women in the economy. 
Lesotho’s real GDP growth rate averaged 3.3 percent in 1991 through 
2007, but the growth rate has been erratic, ranging from less than 1 
percent in 2005 to more than 8 percent in 2006. In 2009, real GDP 
contracted by 0.9 percent. 

Figure: Map of Lesotho: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Lesotho within 
Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Lesotho was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 36 percent of the compact’
s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Lesotho Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2008: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
July 23, 2007: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2008-2013: 
September 17, 2008: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 36%); 
September 16, 2013: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Lesotho has been classified as a low-income country every year since 
MCC began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Lesotho GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $530; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $590; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $740; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $960; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,030; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,000; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,080; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Lesotho has met MCC’s eligibility criteria each year since 2004. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 
Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Lesotho’s compact focused on sectors that affect most of 
the population, such as health care and potable water production. The 
compact aimed to strengthen the country’s health care infrastructure 
to improve health outcomes, improve the water supply for industrial 
and domestic needs, and remove barriers to foreign and local private 
sector investment. At signature, nearly 25 percent of 15- to 49-year-
old adults in Lesotho were HIV/AIDS-positive, the third highest 
prevalence rate in the world. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

The Lesotho compact is one of five compacts for which GAO has 
independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results projections. 
In June 2008, GAO reported that it was unable to assess MCC’s compact-
level impact projections for Lesotho because MCC based them on a prior 
World Bank economic growth model (GAO-08-730). 

Figure: Structure of Lesotho Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Lack of water for industrial and domestic use, the poor health of the 
workforce, and barriers to foreign and local private sector investment 
constrain economic growth. 

Planned Project: Water Sector: 
* Construct bulk water conveyance system to supply water for garment 
and textile factories; 
* Extend and rehabilitate urban and periurban water networks; 
* Improve sanitation for 25,000 rural households by constructing 
ventilated pit latrines and water systems; 
* Restore degraded wetlands at three areas in the highland pastures; 
* Prepare strategic environmental assessments for national watershed 
management and wetlands conservation; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Preserve or create 34,000 jobs; 
* Improved access to water for 454,000 in 5 years; 
* Improved livelihoods of approximately 55,000 people who live within 
16 km of target wetland sites. 

Planned Project: Health Sector: 
* Renovate and rehabilitate 150 health centers; 
* Renovate 14 hospitals to support antiretroviral therapy; 
* Construct, equip, and train staff for a new central laboratory; 
* Construct, equip, and train staff for blood collection and 
processing facilities; 
* Build dormitories and staff housing at the National Health Training 
College.• Strengthen health systems’ training, decentralization, and 
research and development; 
* Improve medical waste management practices; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved delivery of health care services. 

Planned Project: Private Sector Development: 
* Establish a credit bureau and a national identification card system 
to facilitate the exchange of information and the screening of 
prospective debtors; 
* Implement a new system for internal and cross-border payments; 
* Provide technical assistance to revise land reform legislation; 
develop a new land administration authority; fund public outreach; and 
promote gender equality; 
* Develop courts and promote alternative commercial dispute resolution; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Recognized land titles for 55,000 households, improved access to 
credit, and lower cost of receiving and sending money for 184,000 
individuals; 
* Access to a commercial court system for over 2,000 people and 
companies. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increase incomes for approximately 1 million residents of Lesotho.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. MCC did not publish a 
beneficiary estimate for Lesotho at compact signature. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (July 2007), MCC obligated $362.6 million for the Lesotho 
compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount had not 
changed, however minor reallocations of funds were made among projects. 

Figure: Lesotho Compact Funding: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $362.6 million: 
Water Sector ($164.0 million) 45%; 
Health Sector ($122.4 million) 34%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($40.0 million) 
11%.
Private Sector Development ($36.1 million) 10%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $362.6 million: 
Water Sector ($164.0 million) 45%; 
Health Sector ($122.4 million) 34%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($39.7 million) 
11%.
Private Sector Development ($36.5 million) 10%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $20.8 million (approximately 6 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $88.9 million 
(approximately 25 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $59.1 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Lesotho Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $362.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $362.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $88.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $20.8 million. 

Private Sector Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $36.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $36.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $11.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $2.0 million. 

Health Sector: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $122.4 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $122.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $30.5 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $3.2 million. 

Water Sector: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $164.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $164.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $33.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $5.5 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $40.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $39.7 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $14.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $10.2 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Lesotho Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Mali Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in West Africa, Mali has a population of about 12.7 million. 
It is a low-income country. Its economy is based on agriculture, which 
accounts for 45 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) and 
employs about 80 percent of its labor force. Services and industry 
account for 38 and 17 percent of GDP, respectively. Despite its low 
income, Mali has experienced favorable economic growth in recent 
years; in 2009, Mali’s real GDP grew by 3 percent. Mali is considered 
to be one of the strongest democracies in Africa, and its government 
has pursued economic reforms to encourage growth. 

Figure: Map of Mali: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Mali within 
Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Mali was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its first 
eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 56 percent of the compact’s 5-
year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Mali Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2007: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
November 13, 2006: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2007-2012: 
September 17, 2007: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 56%); 
September 16, 2012: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Mali has been classified as a low-income country each year since MCC 
began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Mali GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $230; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $290; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $360; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $380; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $440; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $500; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $580; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Mali met MCC’s eligibility criteria from 2004 through 2007. It did not 
meet the criteria in 2008 through 2010, because it failed three of 
five Investing in People indicators. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Mali’s compact aimed to improve agricultural production 
and productivity in one of the poorest areas of central Mali. At that 
time, 64 percent of Malians were poor and one-third of poor Malians 
lived in extreme poverty. In 2008, MCC restructured the Mali compact 
because of escalating global construction costs, currency 
fluctuations, and operational issues. Funds formerly designated to the 
Industrial Park Project were reallocated to the Airport Project. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact projects’ 
expected results. (See GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Mali Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Lack of adequate infrastructure constrains access to markets and 
trade, efforts to attract businesses, and agricultural production and 
productivity. 

Planned Project: Airport Improvement: 
* Improve infrastructure at the Bamako-Sénou Airport, including the 
runway, navigational equipment, and security systems; 
* Upgrade and construct airport terminal and utility infrastructure; 
* Establish institutional mechanisms for management and maintenance of 
airport facilities; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased revenue from passenger and aircraft traffic and increased 
value and volume of goods shipped through the airport. 

Planned Project: Industrial Park (funding reallocated): 
* Build infrastructure for a 100 hectare industrial park near airport; 
* Resettle and compensate cultivators for loss of livelihoods 
resulting from Airport and Industrial Park improvements; 
* Establish institutional mechanisms for management and maintenance of 
industrial park; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved infrastructure and services for small and medium 
enterprises and improved business climate for prospective 
entrepreneurs and investors. 

Planned Project: Alatona Irrigation: 
* Upgrade 81 km of a north-south road in the national highway network; 
* Develop and expand the Alatona irrigation system and support water 
management; 
* Allocate newly irrigated lands and improve rural land tenure 
security; 
* Provide resettlement, compensation, and social services to 
individuals affected by the irrigation project; 
* Strengthen agricultural practices; 
* Provide financial services to encourage agricultural lending; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased incomes of agricultural workers, decreased vehicle 
operating costs for road users, and improved access to health and 
social services. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 2.8 million Malians.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (November 2006), MCC obligated $460.8 million for the 
Mali compact. In September 2008, MCC and Mali amended the compact, 
removing the Industrial Park Project and reallocating funds to the 
Airport Project. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount 
had not changed. 

Figure: Mali Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $460.8 million: 
Alatona Irrigation ($234.6 million) 51%; 
Industrial Park ($94.3 million) 20%; 
Airport Improvement ($89.6 million) 19%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($42.3 million) 
9%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $460.8 million: 
Alatona Irrigation ($234.6 million) 51%; 
Airport Improvement (181.3 million) 39%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($42.0 million) 
9%; 
Industrial Park ($2.6 million) 1%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: Project allocations in figures may not add up to 100 percent due 
to rounding. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming.
As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $60.6 million (approximately 13 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $210.9 million 
(approximately 46 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $110.2 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Cape Verde Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $460.8 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $460.8 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $210.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $60.6 million. 

Airport Improvement: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $89.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $181.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $83.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.1 million. 

Industrial Park (funding reallocated): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $94.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $2.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $1.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $2.6 million. 

Alatona Irrigation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $234.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $234.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $107.5 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $32.4 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $42.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $42.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $19.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $16.4 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Mali Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Mongolia Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in Asia between Russia and China, Mongolia has a population of 
approximately 2.6 million. It is a low-income country. Its economy is 
based on services, which account for 49 percent of its gross domestic 
product (GDP) and employ 61 percent of the labor force. Industry and 
agriculture account for 30 and 21 percent of GDP, respectively. Mongolia
’s economy struggled during the 1990s following the dissolution of the 
Soviet Union, which had provided up to one-third of Mongolia’s annual 
GDP in foreign assistance. In the mid-2000s, Mongolia’s economy grew 
by nearly 9 percent each year owing largely to its copper and gold 
mining industries, although it has been negatively affected by the 
global financial crisis. 

Figure: Map of Mongolia: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Mongolia 
within Asia] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Mongolia was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 36 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Mongolia Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2008: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
October 22, 2007: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2008-2013: 
September 17, 2008: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 36%); 
September 16, 2013: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries.
Mongolia has been classified as a low-income country every year since 
MCC began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Mongolia GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $400; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $480; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $590; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $690; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $880; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,290; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,880; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it-—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Mongolia has met MCC’s eligibility criteria each year since 2004. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Mongolia’s compact focused on improving the country’s 
human, institutional, and physical resources. In April 2009, the 
government of Mongolia withdrew the Rail Project of the compact. In 
September 2009, MCC approved the reallocation of $50.0 million from 
the $188.4 million Rail Project to expand and modify three existing 
compact projects—Health, Vocational Education, and the periurban 
component of the Property Rights Project. In December 2009, MCC 
approved the reallocation of the remaining funds from the Rail Project 
to two new projects—the Energy and Environment and the North-South 
Road Projects—as well as a contingency fund. The reallocations went 
into effect in January 2010. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009.
GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

MCC has modified the Mongolia compact but only partially recalculated 
the expected results. 

Figure: Structure of Mongolia Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Aging transport infrastructure and weak institutions constrain 
economic growth. 

Planned Project: Rail (funding withdrawn): 
* Provide technical assistance to improve rail operation, management, 
and regulation; 
*Assist the formation and operation of a government-owned company to 
acquire and lease railway assets; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Decreased rail transport costs and increased rail capacity, 
resulting in 21,000 additional jobs over 20 years. 

Planned Project: Property Rights: 
* Upgrade capacity of formal land privatization and registration 
system; 
* Privatize and register land plots in periurban rangeland areas; 
* Lease rangeland to herder groups in three periurban areas; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Access to titled land for approximately 75,000 households and leased 
land for approximately 465 herder groups. 

Planned Project: Vocational Education: 
* Strengthen the vocational education system; 
* Create occupational standards for vocational education; 
* Provide training, equipment, and instructional materials; 
* Establish career guidance and employment information services; 
* Upgrade and modernize up to 15 vocational training centers
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Vocational student enrollment of over 40,000 and improved wage and 
employment for 170,000 graduates over 20 years. 

Planned Project: Health: 
* Improve non-communicable disease and injury (NCDI) health services 
through capacity building, prevention, early detection, and improved 
management activities; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased labor force productivity and decreased health expenditures 
by households on NCDIs. 

Planned Project: North-South Road (new project): 
* Rehabilitate approximately 176 km of a major north-south road; 
* Rehabilitate and construct critical bridges, and rehabilitate a road 
from Ulaanbaatar to Nailakh; 
* Technical assistance to improve road maintenance; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved critical roads and a bridge accessed by at least 87,600 
households. 

Planned Project: Energy and Environment (new project): 
* Promote energy-efficient technologies for domestic use; 
* Develop the first commercial wind-powered electricity generation 
facility in Mongolia; 
* Support a public awareness campaign about renewable energy and 
efficiency. 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Decreased air pollution, improved health outcomes, fuel cost savings 
and improved business productivity. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 2.6 million Mongolians.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (October 2007), MCC obligated $284.9 million for the 
Mongolia compact. In September 2009, due to Mongolia’s request to 
withdraw the $188.4 million Rail Project, MCC approved the 
reallocation of $50.0 million to the three remaining projects. In 
December 2009, MCC approved the reallocation of the remaining Rail 
Project funds to two new projects—Energy and Environment and the North-
South Road—and a contingency fund. The reallocations went into effect 
in January 2010. As of December 2009, the overall obligation remained 
$284.9 million. 

Figure: Mongolia Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $284.9 million: 
Rail ($188.4 million) 66%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($30.9 million) 
11%; 
Vocational Education ($25.5 million) 9%; 
Property Rights ($23.1 million) 8%; 
Health ($17.0 million) 6%; 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $284.9 million: 
North-South Road ($79.8 million) 28%; 
Rail ($0.4 million) 0%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($40.4 million) 
14%; 
Vocational Education ($47.5 million) 17%; 
Energy and Environment ($47.2 million) 17%; 
Property Rights ($27.9 million) 10%; 
Health ($39.0 million) 14%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: The reallocation of Rail Project funds went into effect in 
January 2010. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $9.8 million (approximately 4 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $64.5 million 
(approximately 23 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $6.7 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Rail Project reallocations went into effect in January 2010. 

Figure: Mongolia Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $284.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $284.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $64.5 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.8 million. 

Health: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $17.4 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $39.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $3.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.1 million. 

Property Rights: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $23.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $27.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $5.5 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.8 million. 

Vocational Education: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $25.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $47.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $4.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.9 million. 

Energy & Environment (new project, implemented January 2010): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $0.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $47.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million. 

North-South Road (new project, implemented January 2010): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $0.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $79.8 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million. 

Rail (funding withdrawn, April 2009): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $0.4 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $39.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $0.4 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.4 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $30.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $40.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $11.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $6.3 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Mongolia Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Morocco Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in northern Africa, bordering both the Atlantic Ocean and 
Mediterranean Sea, Morocco has a population of about 31.2 million. It 
is a lower-middle-income country. Its economy is based largely on 
services and industry, which respectively account for 49 and 33 
percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). Agriculture 
accounts for 19 percent of GDP but 45 percent of the labor force. 
Morocco’s economic policies have brought macroeconomic stability to 
the country, with generally low inflation, improved financial sector 
performance, and steady development of the services and industrial 
sectors. Morocco’s primary economic challenge is to accelerate and 
sustain growth in order to reduce high levels of unemployment and 
underemployment. Morocco’s GDP grew by 5.1 percent in 2009. 

Figure: Map of Morocco: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Morocco within 
Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Morocco was the only country to be newly selected as eligible in 
fiscal year 2005, MCC’s second eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 
36 percent of the compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Morocco Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2008: 
November 8, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
August 31, 2007: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2008-2013: 
September 15, 2008: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 36%); 
September 14, 2013: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries.
Morocco was selected as eligible in fiscal year 2005 as a low-income 
country. In 2007, Morocco’s rising GNI per capita lifted it to lower-
middle-income status. 

Figure: Morocco GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): [A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: [A]. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,320; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,520; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,730; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,900; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,250; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,580; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[A] Morocco was not a candidate in 2004. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s Board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Morocco met MCC’s eligibility criteria in 2005 and 2006 but has failed 
each year since. 

Table: Morocco’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Morocco was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Not 
eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Morocco’s compact aimed to stimulate economic growth by 
increasing productivity and improving employment in sectors of the 
economy that the Kingdom of Morocco has identified as having high 
potential for growth, such as agribusiness, fishing, and artisan 
crafts. The compact also focused on supporting small business creation 
and growth by investments in financial services and enterprise 
support. At signature, 11 percent of Moroccans lived in extreme 
poverty. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact projects’ 
expected results. (See GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Morocco Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Low productivity in industrial sectors where Morocco has a comparative 
advantage constrains economic growth. 

Planned Project: Fruit Tree Productivity: 
* Rehabilitate or expand production of olive, almond, and fig trees on 
more than 400,000 acres; 
* Increase irrigation efficiency of olive and date trees on 
approximately 103,000 acres; 
* Establish a national scientific coordinating and advisory committee 
and develop the fruit tree sector value chain; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved livelihoods of approximately 136,000 farm households in 
rural areas of Morocco. 

Planned Project: Small-Scale Fisheries: 
* Construct or upgrade fishery facilities in up to 13 major ports; 
* Construct or rehabilitate up to six wholesale fish markets in major 
cities; 
* Provide technical assistance and equipment to approximately 2,000 
mobile fresh fish vendors; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased net revenue for 25,000 individuals through reduced 
maintenance and repair costs and strengthened market integration. 

Planned Project: Artisan and Fez Medina: 
* Provide technical training, literacy, and vocational education to 
artisans; 
* Improve access to financial services for capital investments to 
increase artisan production; 
* Renovate or reconstruct tourist sites in Fez Medina; 
* Support a marketing campaign; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Approximately 185,000 individuals trained; approximately 20,000 low 
income workers’ poverty reduced in the Fez Medina. 

Planned Project: Financial Services: 
* Support Jaida, a nonbank financial institution providing debt 
funding to the microcredit sector; 
* Support the transformation of regulatory and operational 
requirements for microcredit associations; 
* Improve operational efficiency and transparency of financial 
institutions; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased supply of financial services for approximately 174,000 
individuals or micro-enterprises by the end of the compact term. 

Planned Project: Enterprise Support: 
* Measure impact of and potentially expand two existing Moroccan 
government training initiatives for entrepreneurs; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Training of approximately 600 enterprises and potential provision of 
technical assistance to up to 6,000 enterprises. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 973,000 Moroccans.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would directly benefit 600,000 people over 
the compact term. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (August 2007), MCC obligated $697.5 million for the 
Morocco compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount 
and project allocations had not changed. 

Figure: Morocco Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $697.5 million: 
Fruit Tree Productivity ($300.9 million) 43%; 
Small Scale Fisheries ($116.2 million) 17%; 
Artisan and Fez Medina ($111.9 million) 16%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($88.5 million) 
13%; 
Financial Services ($46.2 million) 7%; 
Enterprise Support ($33.9 million) 5%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $697.5 million: 
Fruit Tree Productivity ($300.9 million) 43%; 
Small Scale Fisheries ($116.2 million) 17%; 
Artisan and Fez Medina ($111.9 million) 16%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($88.5 million) 
13%; 
Financial Services ($46.2 million) 7%; 
Enterprise Support ($33.9 million) 5%. 
Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: Project allocations in figures may not add up to 100 percent due 
to rounding. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming.
As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $35.0 million (5 percent) of 
compact funds, compared with the $201.9 million (29 percent) that it 
had planned to disburse as of that date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $115.2 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Morocco Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $697.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $697.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $201.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $35.0 million. 

Enterprise Support: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $33.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $33.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $2.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.4 million. 

Financial Services: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $46.2 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $46.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $23.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $12.9 million. 

Artisan and Fez Medina: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $111.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $111.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $31.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.4 million. 

Small Scale Fisheries: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $116.2 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $116.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $53.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.2 million. 

Fruit Tree Productivity: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $300.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $300.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $57.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.7 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $88.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $88.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $33.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.3 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Morocco Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Mozambique Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located on the Indian Ocean coast of southern Africa, Mozambique has a 
population of about 21.8 million. It is a low-income country. Its 
economy is based on services and industry, which respectively account 
for 45 and 31 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). 
Agriculture accounts for 24 percent of GDP but employs about 81 
percent of the labor force. Mozambique is considered a strong economic 
performer in Africa and experienced an average of 8 percent growth 
from 1994 to 2007, although growth has slowed in more recent years. 
Macroeconomic reforms by the government, starting in the late 1980s, 
have contributed to the country’s economic growth. However, Mozambique’
s government is still heavily reliant on foreign aid, which comprises 
more than half of its budget. 

Figure: Map of Mozambique: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Mozambique 
within Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Mozambique was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 35 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Mozambique Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2008: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
July 13, 2007: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2008-2013: 
September 22, 2008: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 35%); 
September 21, 2013: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income. 

Mozambique has been classified as a low-income country every year 
since MCC began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Mozambique GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $210; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $210; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $250; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $310; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $340; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $320; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $370; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate's 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—-
even if it fails the criteria—-as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Mozambique fails MCC's criteria in 2004 and 2005, but the MCC board 
deemed it eligible. It met the criteria in 2006 and 2007. Since 2008, 
when MCC added a fifth Investing in People indicator, Mozambique again 
failed the criteria. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Mozambique’s compact targeted four northern provinces: 
Cabo Delgado, Nampula, Niassa, and Zambézia. The compact aims to 
increase the productive capacity of the population in the targeted 
areas. At that time, these provinces were home to more than 10 million 
people. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

The Mozambique compact is one of five compacts for which GAO has 
independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results projections. 
In June 2008, GAO reported that MCC had made errors in its original 
projections of the impact of Mozambique’s compact (GAO-08-730). MCC 
corrected these errors, reducing the expected impact on poverty. For 
example, MCC originally expected to lift 270,000 people out of poverty 
by 2015 but revised that projection to 56,000 people. 

Figure: Structure of Mozambique Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Inadequate infrastructure, poor land tenure administration, limited 
human capacity and poor health, and low agricultural productivity 
constrain economic growth. 

Planned Project: Water Supply and Sanitation: 
* Water supply and sanitation systems in six mid-sized or large cities; 
* Water supply systems in two small towns and 600 rural villages; 
* Repair the Nacala Dam and reservoir; 
* Build the capacity of local institutions to develop policies and 
manage programs; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved access to water and sanitation systems for 1.9 million 
individuals; water systems serve up to 70 percent of the population by 
2015. 

Planned Project: Roads: 
* Rehabilitate 491 km of the main National Route 1 road in three 
provinces; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved access to roads for 2.3 million individuals, decreased 
vehicle operating costs and travel time for vehicle users, and more 
affordable transportation. 

Planned Project: Land Tenure Services: 
* Address implementation problems for the existing land law through 
regulatory review; 
* Build institutional capacity to implement land policies and provide 
quality services; 
* Map and inventory land to support registering land rights, and 
provide information to streamline investor and farmer access to land; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Land-use rights and reduced transaction costs for 1.9 million 
individuals by 2015. 

Planned Project: Farmer Income Support: 
* Eradicate diseased coconut palm trees and replant at least 810,000 
seedlings; 
* Provide technical assistance to increase productivity of coconut 
palms and help farmers diversify into other cash crops; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Benefits for 1.7 million small farmers who depend on coconut tree 
products for cash and in-kind income, and for approximately 5,000 
workers on coconut estates. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 4.4 million Mozambicans.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit approximately 5 million people 
over the compact term. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (July 2007), MCC obligated $506.9 million for the 
Mozambique compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount 
had not changed, however minor reallocations of funds were made among 
projects. 

Figure: Mozambique Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $506.9 million: 
Water Supply and Sanitation ($203.6 million) 40%; 
Roads ($176.3 million) 35%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($70.5 million) 
14%; 
Land Tenure Services ($39.1 million) 8%; 
Farmer Income Support ($17.4 million) 3%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $506.9 million: 
Water Supply and Sanitation ($203.6 million) 40%; 
Roads ($176.3 million) 35%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($69.6 million) 
14%; 
Land Tenure Services ($39.1 million) 8%; 
Farmer Income Support ($18.4 million) 4%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: Project allocations in figures may not add up to 100 percent due 
to rounding. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $16.1 million (approximately 3 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $74.9 million 
(approximately 15 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $57.0 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Mozambique Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $506.9 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $506.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $74.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $16.1 million. 

Farmer Income Support: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $17.4 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $18.4 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $4.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.3 million. 

Land Tenure Services: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $39.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $39.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $8.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $2.2 million. 

Roads: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $176.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $176.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $6.9 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.7 million. 

Water Supply and Sanitation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $203.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $203.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $25.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $2.0 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $70.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $69.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $29.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $9.1 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Mozambique Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Namibia Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located on the Atlantic coast of southern Africa, Namibia has a 
population of about 2.1 million. It is an upper-middle-income country. 
Its economy is based on services and industry, which respectively 
account for 56 and 35 percent of the country’s gross domestic product 
(GDP); the extraction and processing of minerals is an important 
economic activity. Agriculture accounts for 9 percent of GDP but 
employs 47 percent of the labor force. Namibia’s annual economic 
growth since independence from South Africa in 1990 has averaged 4.5 
percent but has slowed in recent years. According to the World Bank, 
Namibia has a strong democracy with sound economic management, good 
governance, basic civic freedoms, and respect for human rights. 
However, the social and economic imbalances of apartheid still affect 
Namibia. 

Figure: Map of Namibia: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Namibia within 
Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Namibia was one of two lower-middle-income countries selected in the 
fiscal year 2006 eligibility round, the first year of MCC’s program 
for lower-middle-income countries. As of June 30, 2010, 16 percent of 
the compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Namibia Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2005-2009: 
November 8, 2005: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
July 28, 2008: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2009-2014: 
September 16, 2009: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 16%); 
September 15, 2014: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Namibia was selected as eligible in fiscal year 2006 and was 
classified as a lower-middle-income country until 2009. In 2010, 
Namibia’s rising GNI per capita lifted it to upper-middle-income 
status. 

Figure: Namibia GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): [A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): [A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,370; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,990; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $3,230; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $3,360; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $4,200[B]; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[A] Namibia was not a candidate in 2004 and 2005. 

[B] Because Namibia rose to upper-middle-income status, it was not a 
candidate for assistance in 2010. However its existing compact with 
MCC was not affected. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Namibia met MCC’s eligibility criteria in 2006 and 2007 but not in 
2008 and 2009 because it failed more than half of the Investing in 
People indicators. MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia in 2010 
because it became an upper-middle-income country. 

Table: Namibia’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; Namibia was not a candidate in 2004; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; Namibia was not a candidate in 2005; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC did not create a scorecard for Namibia 
in 2010 because it rose to upper-middle-income status: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Namibia’s compact focused on improving the quality of 
education for the rural poor, primarily in the northern part of the 
country, and diversifying Namibia’s economy with an emphasis on its 
growing agriculture and tourism sectors. At that time, Namibia had 
high unemployment, extreme disparity in wealth and income between the 
rich and poor, and an HIV prevalence rate of nearly 20 percent. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact projects’ 
expected results. (See GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Namibia Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
An inadequately educated/skilled workforce and an economy narrowly 
focused on mineral commodities with underdeveloped livestock and 
tourism sectors constrain economic growth. 

Planned Project: Education: 
* Improve infrastructure and provide equipment for 47 schools; 
* Establish a National Training Fund and a sustainable fee system for 
vocational training; 
* Establish transparent acquisition processes for new textbooks and 
purchase textbooks for grades 5 to 12; 
* Construct three regional libraries; 
* Establish a financial aid system for tertiary and technical 
education; 
* Strengthen Ministry of Education’s HIV/AIDs awareness and prevention 
plans; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* 1 million students receive textbooks; 47,000 rural students receive 
higher quality schools; 50,000 students receive vocational training; 
8,000 people have access to libraries; and 11,000 students receive 
financing for tertiary education. 

Planned Project: Tourism: 
* Improve the management capacity and infrastructure—such as 
management centers and staff housing—of Etosha National Park; 
* Develop marketing strategy for Namibia tourism, including a Web site 
and regional tourism packages; 
* Provide technical assistance to about 31 conservancies to help them 
become financially self-sustainable; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Increased tourism visits, value added to Namibian economy, 
employment and conservancy incomes, profits to joint venture partners, 
and wildlife populations. 

Planned Project: Agriculture: 
* Improve communal land access and introduce effective communal land 
management practices through public outreach, capacity building, and a 
land verification and registration process; 
* Construct about 5 veterinary centers in under-served communities; 
* Increase the volume and quality of indigenous natural products and 
fund research, testing, and application of industry innovations and 
services; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved rangeland access and management and veterinary services. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 1.1 million Namibians.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit approximately 1.5 million 
people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (July 2008), MCC obligated $304.5 million for the Namibia 
compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount and 
project allocations had not changed. 

Figure: Namibia Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $304.5 million: 
Education ($145.0 million) 48%; 
Tourism ($67.0 million) 22%; 
Agriculture ($47.0 million) 15%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($45.6 million) 
15%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $304.5 million: 
Education ($145.0 million) 48%; 
Tourism ($67.0 million) 22%; 
Agriculture ($47.0 million) 15%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($45.6 million) 
15%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $4.5 million (approximately 2 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $13.2 million 
(approximately 5 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $5.9 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Namibia Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $304.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $304.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $13.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $4.5 million. 

Agriculture: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $47.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $47.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $1.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.0 million. 

Tourism: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $67.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $67.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $2.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.1 million. 

Education: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $145.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $145.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $5.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $0.3 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $45.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $45.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $4.3 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $4.0 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Namibia Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Nicaragua Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in Central America, Nicaragua has a population of 5.7 million. 
It is a low-income country. Its economy is based primarily on 
services, which account for 57 percent of the country’s gross domestic 
product (GDP) and employ 52 percent of the labor force. Industry and 
agriculture account for 26 and 18 percent of GDP, respectively. 
Nicaragua’s real GDP contracted by about 3 percent in 2009. In 
November 2008, Nicaragua held municipal elections, the credibility of 
which was questioned by the U.S. government. Subsequently, the MCC 
partially terminated its compact with Nicaragua on the grounds that 
the government had engaged in actions inconsistent with MCC 
eligibility criteria. 

Figure: Map of Nicaragua: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Nicaragua 
within Central America] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Nicaragua was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 82 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Nicaragua Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2006: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
July 14, 2005: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2006-2011: 
May 26, 2006: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 18%); 
May 25, 2011: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle income countries. 

Nicaragua has been classified as a low-income country every year
since MCC began operations in 2004. 

Figure: Nicaragua GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): less than $745[A]; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $730; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $790; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $910; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,000; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $980; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,080; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[A] Nicaragua did not have a confirmed GNI for 2004. The World Bank 
estimated it at less than $745. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it-—
even if it fails the criteria-—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Nicaragua has met MCC’s eligibility criteria each year from 2004
through 2008. It did not meet the criteria in 2009 and 2010 because it
failed the corruption indicator. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Nicaragua’s compact aimed to build productive capacity 
in León and Chinandega, two regions in the northwest, where 70 percent 
of the rural population was poor. In June 2009, MCC partially 
terminated the Nicaragua compact, ceasing to fund the Property 
Regularization Project and activities not yet contracted under the 
Transportation Project. MCC acted in response to actions by the 
government of Nicaragua inconsistent with MCC’s eligibility criteria: 
electoral irregularities were reported surrounding the November 2008 
municipal elections. MCC will continue to upgrade 20 km of the Pacific 
Corridor highway and 54 km of rural secondary roads under the compact. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact results. (See 
GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

MCC has modified the Nicaragua compact but only partially recalculated 
the expected results. 

Figure: Structure of Nicaragua Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Insecure property rights and inefficient property registration 
services, poor roads, and a focus on low-value crops undermine 
enterprise development, investment, and rural income growth. 

Planned Project: Property Regularization (partially terminated): 
* Provide technical support to the government to implement property 
regularization reforms in León; 
* Conduct property mapping in the region of León and link with the 
municipal and national registry; 
* Clarify and improve documentation of property rights, including 
demarcation of environmentally protected areas; 
* Fund short-term efforts to promote use of the improved property 
registration system; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved land rights for women and the poor and improved investment 
climate for residents and businesses; 
* More secure, registered land titles for 70 percent of rural and 50 
percent of urban properties in León (a total of 43,000 properties). 

Planned Project: Transportation (partially terminated): 
* Upgrade a 58 km stretch of the Nicaragua portion of the Pacific 
Corridor Highway; 
* Upgrade 74 km (previously 100 km) of secondary roads to link rural 
producers to the primary road network; 
* Provide technical assistance to government for road maintenance; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Reduced transportation costs, stimulation of economic development, 
and improved access to markets and social services for users. 

Planned Project: Rural Business Development: 
* Provide business development, technical, and financial assistance to 
transition rural businesses in the León-Chinandega region, including 
farmers, to higher profit businesses; 
* Provide grants to improve water supply for farming and irrigation; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Generation of an estimated 7,000 new jobs and increased farmer 
profits and wages by approximately $30 million annually, beginning 6 
years after project initiation. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 108,000 Nicaraguans.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. The termination of 
two projects may affect results. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. MCC did not publish a 
beneficiary estimate for Nicaragua at compact signature. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (July 2005), MCC obligated $175.0 million for the 
Nicaragua compact. In June 2009, MCC partially terminated assistance 
under the Nicaragua compact ceasing to fund the Property 
Regularization Project and activities not already contracted under the 
Transportation Project. As of December 2009, the overall obligation 
had decreased to $113.6 million. 

Figure: Nicaragua Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $175.0 million: 
Transportation ($92.8 million) 53%; 
Rural Business Development ($33.7 million) 19%; 
Property Regularization ($26.5 million) 15%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($22.1 million) 
13%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $113.6 million: 
Transportation ($58.0 million) 51%; 
Rural Business Development ($32.9 million) 29%; 
Property Regularization ($7.2 million) 6%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($15.5 million) 
14%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $87.8 million (approximately 77 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $81.8 million (72 
percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $15.3 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Nicaragua Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $175.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $113.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $81.8 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $87.8 million. 

Property Regularization (partially terminated): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $26.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $7.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $5.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $7.2 million. 

Rural Business Development: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $33.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $32.9 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $23.7 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $22.4 million. 

Transportation (partially terminated): 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $92.8 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $58.0 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $44.1 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $22.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $15.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $11.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $10.4 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Nicaragua Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Tanzania Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in eastern Africa, Tanzania-—including the islands of 
Zanzibar—-has a population of about 42.5 million. It is a low-income 
country. Its economy is based primarily on services, which account for 
51 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). Industry 
accounts for 23 percent of GDP, with gold and mineral mining growing 
in importance. Agriculture accounts for 27 percent of GDP but employs 
80 percent of the labor force. Tanzania has experienced several years 
of real GDP growth—more than 7 percent in 2007 and 2008—although it 
slowed to about 4.5 percent in 2009. 

Figure: Map of Tanzania: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Tanzania 
within Africa] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Tanzania was first selected as eligible in MCC’s third eligibility 
round for low-income countries. As of June 30, 2010, 36 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Tanzania Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2005-2008: 
November 8, 2005: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
February 17, 2008: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2008-2013: 
September 15, 2008: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 36%); 
September 14, 2013: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. Also, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries.
Tanzania was selected as eligible in fiscal year 2006 and has been 
classified as a low-income country ever since. 

Figure: Tanzania GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $270; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $290; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $330; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $340; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $350; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $400; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $430; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Tanzania has met MCC’s eligibility indicator criteria each year since 
it was first deemed eligible in 2006. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: Passed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Not eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Not eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Tanzania’s compact focused on rehabilitating road 
networks, improving and extending electricity service and coverage, 
and increasing the quantity and reliability of clean and safe water 
for domestic and commercial use. At that time, approximately 35 
percent of the mainland and nearly 50 percent of the Zanzibar region’s 
populations lived below the national poverty line. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009.
GAO has not independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results 
projections for this compact. Previous GAO work has identified several 
problems with the methodology used to determine compact projects’ 
expected results. (See GAO-08-730 and GAO-07-909.) 

Figure: Structure of Tanzania Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
An inadequate transportation network, an insufficient and unreliable 
supply of energy, and a shortage of clean and safe water constrain 
economic growth and private sector investment. 

Planned Project: Transport Sector: 
* Rehabilitate and upgrade approximately 431 kilometers of three 
highways connecting mainland Tanzania to Kenya and Zambia and linking 
some regional capitals; 
* Improve up to five rural roads on Pemba Island, totaling about 35 
kilometers; 
* Improve Tanzania’s capacity to maintain its road network by 
supporting strategic maintenance planning and contract management; 
* Rehabilitate and upgrade facilities at the airport on Mafia Island; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Reduced transport costs and travel times to social services and 
markets, increase year-round access to markets, and improve tourist 
and business access to Mafia Island. 

Planned Project: Energy Sector: 
* Improve the electric power supply to Zanzibar’s Unguja Island by 
laying an underwater transmission cable and reinforcing power 
substations and existing lines; 
* Conduct feasibility studies for a hydropower plant on the Malagarasi 
River; 
* Rehabilitate the power distribution infrastructure and extend 
distribution lines to unserved areas in six regions; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved quality of and access to electricity for 252,000 
households, and provide access to electricity for 88,000 previously 
unserved households and businesses by 2020. 

Planned Project: Water Sector: 
* Expand the capacity of a water treatment plant serving Dar es Salaam; 
* Improve the capacity of the Dar es Salaam Water and Sewage Authority 
and Company to address physical leaks and commercial losses due to 
theft and poor billing practices; 
* Rehabilitate water intake and treatment plants and improve the 
existing distribution network in the city of Morogoro; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Improved quality and reliability of the water supply for 667,000 
households in Dar es Salaam and Morogoro. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 5.4 million Tanzanians.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit approximately 4.8 million 
people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (February 2008), MCC obligated $698.1 million for the 
Tanzania compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount 
and project allocations had not changed. 

Figure: Tanzania Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $698.1 million: 
Transport Sector ($372.8 million) 53%; 
Energy Sector ($206.5 million) 30%; 
Water Sector ($66.3 million) 10%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($22.9 million) 
10%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $698.1 million: 
Transport Sector ($372.8 million) 53%; 
Energy Sector ($206.5 million) 30%; 
Water Sector ($66.3 million) 10%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($22.9 million) 
10%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Note: The difference in total compact funds allocated at compact 
signature and as of December 2009 is due to rounding. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming. 

As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $11.1 million (approximately 2 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $104.2 million 
(approximately 15 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $85.7 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Tanzania Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $698.1 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $698.1 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $104.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $11.1 million. 

Water Sector: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $66.3 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $66.3 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $10.8 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $1.1 million. 

Energy Sector: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $206.5 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $206.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $30.1 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $3.0 million. 

Transport Sector: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $372.8 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $372.8 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $47.0 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $3.0 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $52.6 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $52.6 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $16.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $3.8 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Tanzania Fact Sheet] 

Millennium Challenge Corporation: Vanuatu Compact Fact Sheet: 

Country Characteristics: 

Located in the South Pacific about 1,300 miles northeast of Sydney, 
Australia, Vanuatu consists of 83 islands and has a population of 
about 200,000. It is a lower-middle-income country. Its economy is 
based primarily on services, which account for about 62 percent of its 
gross domestic product (GDP). Agriculture accounts for 26 percent of 
GDP but employs 65 percent of the labor force. Industry accounts for 
12 percent of GDP. Fishing, offshore financial services, and tourism 
are important economic activities. Vanuatu has experienced several 
years of real GDP growth—more than 6 percent in 2007 and 2008—although 
it slowed to about 3.8 percent in 2009. 

Figure: Map of Vanuatu: 

[Refer to PDF for image: map indicating the location of Vanuatu in the 
Pacific Ocean off the coast of Australia] 

Source: Map Resources (map). 

[End of figure] 

Compact Timeline: 

During compact development, MCC and an eligible country negotiate 
project proposals and the compact’s terms. After the compact is 
signed, the country finalizes administrative requirements, such as 
procurement and disbursement agreements. When the compact enters into 
force, MCC obligates funds and compact implementation begins. MCC’s 
statute limits compact implementation to 5 years. 

Vanuatu was 1 of 16 countries that MCC selected as eligible in its 
first eligibility round. As of June 30, 2010, 83 percent of the 
compact’s 5-year period had elapsed. 

Figure: Key Events for Vanuatu Compact: 

[Refer to PDF for image: timeline] 

Compact development: 2004-2006: 
May 6, 2004: Selected as eligible for assistance; 
March 2, 2006: Compact signed. 

Compact Implementation: 2006-2011: 
April 28, 2006: Compact enters into force, implementation begins. 
June 30, 2010: Current (Compact implementation time elapsed: 83%); 
April 27, 2011: Compact implementation ends; MCC funding expires. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Selection Criteria: 

MCC Candidate Criteria: 

Each fiscal year, MCC uses per capita gross national income (GNI) data 
to identify two pools of candidate countries—low-income and lower-
middle-income—based on World Bank lending thresholds. In addition, a 
candidate country must not be statutorily barred from receiving U.S. 
assistance. By law, MCC can use up to 25 percent of compact assistance 
each year for new compacts with lower-middle-income countries. 

Vanuatu was a low-income country from 2004, the year that MCC began 
operations, through 2008. In 2009 Vanuatu’s rising GNI per capita 
lifted it to lower-middle-income status. 

Figure: Vanuatu GNI Per Capita: 

[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar chart] 

MCC eligibility year: 2004; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,050; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,415. 

MCC eligibility year: 2005; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,180; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,465. 

[MCC’s program for lower-middle-income countries began in 2006] 

MCC eligibility year: 2006; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,340; 
MCC cutoff off for low-income candidates: $1,575; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,255. 

MCC eligibility year: 2007; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,600; 
MCC cutoff off lower-middle-income candidates: $1,675; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,465. 

MCC eligibility year: 2008; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,710; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,735; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,595. 

MCC eligibility year: 2009; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $1,840; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,785; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,705. 

MCC eligibility year: 2010; 
Nominal GNI per capita (in U.S. dollars): $2,330; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $1,855; 
MCC cutoff off for lower-middle-income candidates: $3,855. 

Source: GAO analysis of World Bank World Development Indicators and 
MCC income cutoffs. 

[End of figure] 

MCC Eligibility Criteria: 

MCC’s board uses quantitative indicators to assess a candidate’s 
policy performance. To meet MCC’s criteria, a country must pass the 
control of corruption indicator and at least half of the indictors in 
each of three categories. To pass an indicator, a country must score 
above the median in its income group. However, the board may select a 
country as eligible even if it does not meet the criteria. Once MCC 
has signed a compact with a country, MCC continues to work with it—
even if it fails the criteria—as long as its actions are not 
inconsistent with the criteria. If a country’s policy performance 
declines, the board can suspend or terminate the compact. 

Vanuatu met MCC’s eligibility criteria each year from 2004 through 
2008. In 2009, Vanuatu rose to lower-middle-income status and failed 
the indicator criteria for that group. 

Table: Cape Verde’s Performance on MCC Eligibility Indicators: 

Indicator category: 

Ruling Justly: Political Rights: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Civil Liberties: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Voice and Accountability: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Government Effectiveness: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Rule of Law: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Ruling Justly: Control of Corruption: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Indicator category: 

Investing in People: Girls’ Primary Education Completion[A]: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed; 

Investing in People: Primary Education Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Health Expenditures: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Investing in People: Immunization Rates: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Investing in People: Natural Resource Management (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator category: 

Economic Freedom: Country Credit Rating (2004-2005): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Days to Start a Business (2004-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Cost of Starting a Business (2006-2007): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A. 

Economic Freedom: Business Start-up (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Inflation: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Fiscal Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Passed. 

Economic Freedom: Trade Policy: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Regulatory Quality: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Economic Freedom: Land Rights and Access (2008-2010): 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: N/A; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

Indicator performance results: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Passed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: Failed; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: Failed. 

MCC eligibility determination: 
MCC eligibility year: 2004; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2005; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2006; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2007; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2008; MCC income group: Low: Eligible; 
MCC eligibility year: 2009; MCC income group: Low: N/A[B]; 
MCC eligibility year: 2010; MCC income group: Lower-middle: N/A[B]. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Passed: scored above the median; 
Failed: scored at the median or below; 
N/A: NA for that year. 

[A] In 2004, the indicator was "Primary Education Completion." 

[B] In 2009, MCC stopped making an eligibility determination for 
countries with existing compacts. 

[End of table] 

Compact Summary: 

Compact Characteristics: 

MCC and the partner country determine the compact structure before the 
compact is signed. However, the structure of some compacts has been 
altered during implementation. 

At signature, Vanuatu’s compact aimed to benefit poor, rural, 
agricultural producers and providers of tourism-related goods and 
services by reducing transportation costs and improving the 
reliability of access to transportation services. At signature, 80 
percent of the population lived in rural areas and 51 percent of rural 
residents lived in hardship. The compact was rescoped in early 2008 
due to several circumstances, including escalating global construction 
costs and currency fluctuations, and the scope of the Transport 
Infrastructure Project was reduced. 

Expected Results: 

This graphic presents MCC’s expectations of selected compact results 
at compact signature and at the end of fiscal year 2009. 

The Vanuatu compact is one of five compacts for which GAO has 
independently verified the reliability of MCC’s results projections. 
In July 2007, GAO reported that MCC had overstated the expected 
results of its Vanuatu compact; GAO also identified additional risks 
that could affect compact results (GAO-07-909). 

Figure: Structure of Vanuatu Compact, as of December 2009: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Constraints to Development: 
Poor transportation infrastructure constrains private sector 
development and access to social services. 

Planned Project: Transportation infrastructure: 
* Construct and seal two national roads, the Efate Ring road and the 
Santo East Coast road; 
MCC Expected Results[A]: 
* Benefit providers of travel-related goods and services and local 
producers and inhabitants of remote communities with limited access to 
social and other services. 

MCC Overall Expected Result: 
Increased incomes for approximately 15,000 ni-Vanuatu.[B] 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[A] MCC expected results are reported as of compact signature, except 
the number of beneficiaries with increased incomes. 

[B] In fiscal year 2009, MCC recalculated the number of expected 
beneficiaries using a standardized methodology. At compact signature, 
MCC reported the compact would benefit approximately 65,000 people. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Project Funding: 

MCC and the country may reallocate funds among projects during 
implementation. In some cases, MCC has also changed the overall 
compact obligation. 

At signature (March 2006), MCC obligated $65.7 million for the Vanuatu 
compact. As of December 2009, the overall obligation amount had not 
changed, however funds were reallocated from Transport Infrastructure 
project to the Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation. 

Figure: Vanuatu Project Allocations: 

[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts] 

Total allocated at compact signature: $65.7 million: 
Transportation Infrastructure ($60.7 million) 92%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($5.0 million) 8%. 

Total allocated as of December 2009: $65.7 million: 
Transportation Infrastructure ($60.2 million) 92%; 
Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation ($5.5 million) 8%. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

[End of figure] 

Compact Disbursements: 

At compact signature, MCC develops a disbursement plan for the 
compact. MCC disburses funds as the country begins implementing 
projects. According to MCC, any funds not disbursed within 120 days 
after the compact ends would return to MCC for reprogramming.
As of December 2009, MCC had disbursed $45.2 million (approximately 69 
percent) of compact funds, compared with the $63.2 million 
(approximately 96 percent) that it had planned to disburse as of that 
date. 

Although it is not shown in the graphic, in addition to the above 
disbursements, $18.4 million has been committed under the compact for 
pending expenses as of December 2009. 

Figure: Vanuatu Planned and Actual Disbursements: 

[Refer to PDF for image: horizontal bar graph] 

Total for compact: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $65.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $65.7 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $63.2 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $45.2 million. 

Transportation Infrastructure: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $60.7 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $60.2 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $59.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $42.2 million. 

Program Administration and Monitoring and Evaluation: 
Total allocated as of compact signature: $5.0 million; 
Total allocated as of December 2009: $5.5 million; 
Planned disbursements through December 2009: $3.6 million; 
Actual disbursements through December 2009: $2.8 million. 

Source: GAO analysis of Millennium Challenge Corporation data. 

Notes: We base planned disbursements on MCC's projections for the 
fiscal quarter ending December 2009. We assume that funds are 
disbursed evenly throughout each year. Actual disbursements by project 
may not add up to total disbursements because some disbursements are 
pending allocation to projects and are reflected in the total but not 
in the projects. 

[End of figure] 

[End of Vanuatu Fact Sheet] 

Footnotes: 

[1] We have not included a fact sheet on the Madagascar compact 
because, as the result of an undemocratic transfer of power in 
Madagascar in March 2009, MCC formally terminated the compact 
effective August 31, 2009. 

[2] The data within the fact sheets reflect the most recent 
information available on compact modifications and take into account 
MCC's ongoing planning and disbursement processes. As a result, key 
compact events are reported as of the end of the third quarter of 
fiscal year 2010 (June 2010); compact project allocations are reported 
as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 (December 
2009); planned actual compact fund disbursements are reported through 
the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 (December 2009). 

[3] MCC compact funds are committed up front when compacts are signed 
with the partner country and obligated after a compact enters into 
force. MCC defines allocations as compact funds assigned to a specific 
compact project, which may be reallocated among projects during 
compact implementation. Disbursements are payments from MCC compact 
funds, usually directly to a vendor. These funds are authorized for 
expenditure on a quarterly basis for costs associated with program 
implementation. The agency defines contract commitments as the 
forecasted value of any contract (or recurring expense outside of a 
contract such as salaries or utilities), and on the project level, 
these forecasts are often listed as "commitments." 

[4] Previous GAO work examined the methodology used by MCC to 
determine compact projects' results. See GAO, Millennium Challenge 
Corporation: Vanuatu Compact Overstates Projected Program Impact, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-909] (Washington, D.C.: 
July 11, 2007) and Millennium Challenge Corporation: Independent 
Reviews and Consistent Approaches Will Strengthen Projections of 
Program Impact, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-730] 
(Washington D.C.: June 17, 2008). 

[End of section] 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each 
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly 
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] 
and select "E-mail Updates." 

Order by Phone: 

The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO’s Web site, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm]. 

Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537. 

Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional 
information. 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: 
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4400: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7125: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4800: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7149: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: