This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-06-791R 
entitled 'Commerce Information Technology Solutions Next Generation 
Governmentwide Acquisition Contract' which was released on June 14, 
2006. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

June 14, 2006: 

Congressional Committees: 

Subject: Commerce Information Technology Solutions Next Generation 
Governmentwide Acquisition Contract: 

Concerns have been raised about the fairness of the "bid down" approach 
of the Department of Commerce's Information Technology Solutions Next 
Generation (COMMITS NexGen) contract. In response to these concerns, 
the fiscal year 2006 Science, the Departments of State, Justice, and 
Commerce, and Related Agencies appropriations conference report 
requested our review of COMMITS NexGen. This letter transmits the 
briefing document we provided to your staff on May 15, 2006, concerning 
a variety of issues related to the COMMITS NexGen contract. 
Specifically, we provided information on (1) how the COMMITS NexGen 
contract is structured to meet its intended goals, (2) what effect the 
tier system has on the task order competition process, and (3) what 
oversight and internal control procedures Commerce has implemented to 
address the risks of interagency contracting. 

The COMMITS NexGen tier structure, which includes a range of sizes of 
small business contractors and allows similar size contractors to 
compete against each other, is unique among other similar contracts. We 
found that many of the 55 COMMITS NexGen contractors have grown 
significantly or have been acquired by larger businesses and may no 
longer meet small business size standards. In addition, small business 
accomplishments might be overstated since specific small business size 
standards are not identified for each task order. We also found that a 
significant portion of the task orders intended for the smallest 
contractors were issued to larger, incumbent contractors. However, 
because of the way in which the Department of Commerce has defined 
incumbency for this contract, an incumbent contractor may have obtained 
its initial work through a contracting vehicle other than COMMITS 
NexGen. With regard to oversight and internal controls, the COMMITS 
NexGen program has established procedures; however, it is unclear 
whether some of these controls are in place and others, such as 
performance measures, have yet to be established to ensure that the 
program is meeting its goals. Program officials said they will begin to 
collect specific performance data later this fiscal year. The Small 
Business Administration has proposed regulations that would address the 
issues we identified with contractors not meeting the small business 
size standards; therefore, we are not making any recommendations at 
this time. 

We provided a draft of this briefing to the Department of Commerce for 
review and comment. The Department of Commerce Director for Acquisition 
Management and Procurement Executive provided comments via e-mail. He 
stated that not assigning industry codes or requiring business size 
certification for each task order is a procedure that is used with 
other interagency contracts, but they agreed that a rule change could 
help with fairness in implementing the contract as intended. Concerning 
the contractors that may no longer meet small business size standards 
because they have grown significantly, Commerce stated that they will 
follow the final ruling when it is issued and made effective by the 
Small Business Administration; however, until then, Commerce will 
continue to require small business size recertification every three 
years. With regard to the contractors that have been acquired, Commerce 
commented that they are requesting each company to submit a novation 
package to determine eligibility to continue as a COMMITS NexGen 
contractor.[Footnote 1] 

We are sending copies of this briefing to interested congressional 
committees, the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget, and the Administrators for General Services and 
Small Business. We also will make copies available to others upon 
request. In addition, the briefing will be available at no charge on 
GAO's Web site at www.gao.gov. 

If you or your staff have questions regarding this briefing, please 
contact me at (202) 512-4841 or ShamesL@gao.gov. Contact points for our 
Office of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on 
the last page of this briefing. GAO staff who contributed to this 
briefing were Amelia Shachoy, Assistant Director; Sarah Jane Hise; Russ 
Reiter; and Karen Thornton. 

Signed by: 

Lisa Shames: 
Acting Director: 
Acquisition and Sourcing Management: 

Enclosure: 

List of Committees: 

The Honorable Richard C. Shelby: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski: 
Ranking Member: 
Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies: 
Committee on Appropriations United States Senate: 

The Honorable Frank R. Wolf: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Alan B. Mollohan: 
Ranking Member: 
Subcommittee on Science, the Department of State, Justice, and 
Commerce, and Related Agencies: 
Committee on Appropriations: 
House of Representatives: 

Commerce Information Technology Solutions Next Generation 
Governmentwide Acquisition Contract: 

Engagement Objectives, Scope, and Methodology: 

Objectives: 

Concerns have been raised about the fairness of the "bid down" approach 
of the Department of Commerce's Information Technology Solutions Next 
Generation (COMMITS NexGen) contract because it permits incumbent 
contractors to compete against smaller firms. In response to these 
concerns, the fiscal year 2006 Science, the Departments of State, 
Justice, and Commerce, and Related Agencies appropriations conference 
report requested our review of the COMMITS NexGen governmentwide 
acquisition contract.[Footnote 2] Specifically, we examined: 

* how the COMMITS NexGen contract is structured to meet its intended 
goals; 

* what effect the tier system has on the task order competition 
process; and: 

* what oversight and internal control procedures Commerce has 
implemented to address the risks of interagency contracting. 

Scope and Methodology: 

To determine how the contract is structured to meet its intended goals, 
we: 

* reviewed and analyzed the business case documentation specifying the 
purpose and goals of the contract; 

* met with officials at the Department of Commerce, General Services 
Administration (GSA), Small Business Administration (SBA), the Office 
of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), 
and four small COMMITS NexGen contractors that have been actively 
submitting work proposals; 

* compared COMMITS NexGen with other small business governmentwide 
acquisition contracts; 

* met with SBA officials concerning small business regulations 
affecting small business size determinations and compared all 
contractors' current business size with SBA's small business size 
standards as well as to the industry codes used to qualify for the 
contract; and: 

* reviewed contractors' current business size information obtained from 
Central Contractor Registration (CCR), including the SBA's Dynamic 
Small Business database,[Footnote 3] or other publicly available 
information. 

To determine the effect of the tier system on the task order 
competition process, we: 

* identified the criteria used to place contractors into their 
respective tiers and analyzed data to determine under what industry 
codes contractors had performed prior government work; and: 

* reviewed each of the 19 task orders issued as of April 30, 2006, 
under COMMITS NexGen. 

To identify the oversight and internal control procedures that Commerce 
has implemented to address the risks of interagency contracting we: 

* obtained documentation and interviewed officials with regard to the 
definition of roles and responsibilities, training, and guidance on the 
use of the vehicle and compared this information with concerns 
identified in our prior work on interagency contracting. 

We compared the data from the CCR and Federal Procurement Data System 
to other supporting documents to determine data consistency and 
reasonableness and found it sufficiently reliable for the purposes of 
this report. 

We conducted our work from February 2006 through May 2006 in accordance 
with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

Summary: 

Background: 

COMMITS NexGen is a governmentwide acquisition contract (GWAC) designed 
to offer information technology services to federal customers through a 
pool of highly-qualified small businesses. In January 2005, Commerce 
awarded 55 contracts to small businesses grouped into three tiers based 
on their size. COMMITS NexGen small business contractors provide 
services to federal customers through task orders. The contract has an 
$8 billion ceiling over a 10 year performance period. 

COMMITS was originally established in 1999 to allow federal agencies to 
compete information technology solutions from a pool of small 
businesses. The original COMMITS contract reached its $1.5 billion 
ceiling in December 2004. To continue the goals of COMMITS, Commerce 
established COMMITS NexGen. 

For COMMITS NexGen, Commerce created three tiers of similar size 
businesses to allow them to compete against each other. Contractors are 
placed in a tier based on their size as well as the type of service. 
The type of service is defined by the North American Industry 
Classification System (NAICS). Commerce used 19 different NAICS codes. 
The size standards are drawn from SBA, which publishes a table of small 
business size standards matched to each of the NAICS codes.[Footnote 4] 

As of April 30, 2006, 19 task orders totaling about $419 million had 
been issued. 

In 2005, GAO designated management of interagency contracting as a 
governmentwide high-risk area. In recent years, federal agencies have 
been making a major shift in the way they procure many goods and 
services. Rather than spending a great deal of time and resources 
contracting for goods and services themselves, they are making greater 
use of existing contracts, such as GWACs, already awarded by other 
agencies. These contract vehicles offer the benefits of improved 
efficiency and timeliness; however, they need to be effectively 
managed. If not properly managed, a number of factors can make these 
interagency contract vehicles high risk. For example, these vehicles: 

* attract rapid growth of taxpayer dollars; 

* are administered and used by some agencies that have limited 
expertise with this contracting method; and: 

* contribute to a more complex contracting environment in which 
accountability has not always been clearly established. 

Findings: 

The COMMITS NexGen tier structure is unique among GWACs. 

Many COMMITS NexGen contractors have grown significantly or been 
acquired by larger businesses since their small business certification 
with COMMITS NexGen and may no longer meet the small business size 
standards. 

COMMITS NexGen permits incumbent contractors to compete for task orders 
otherwise designated for lower tier competition. Commerce defines an 
"incumbent" as a firm that is currently the prime contractor for work 
that will be continued under a new task order. The prime contractor may 
have obtained the initial work through a contracting vehicle other than 
COMMITS NexGen. 

Only 30 percent, about $125 million, of the total task order value was 
competed among the smallest contractors. A significant portion of this 
was placed with larger incumbent contractors. 

Because COMMITS NexGen does not include NAICS codes on individual task 
orders the program does not verify that contractors meet a particular 
size standard for that work. This may result in overstating small 
business contracting accomplishments. 

COMMITS NexGen lacks measures for assessing performance. 

Tier Structure Seeks Competition among Similar Size Businesses: 

Commerce's goals included: 

* having a range of small business size contractors; 

* establishing tiers to allow similar size contractors to compete 
against each other; and: 

* supporting the smallest of the small businesses through the tier 
structure. 

To accomplish these goals, Commerce used NAICS codes to differentiate 
small business sizes as shown in table 1. 

Table 1: Qualifying Industry Codes Used to Determine COMMITS NexGen 
Small Business Contractor Eligibility: 

Tier: One; 
North American Industry Classification System Codes and Type of 
Service: 518112 - Web search portals; 
519120 - Libraries and archives. 
519190 - All other information services. 
541690 - Other scientific and technical consulting services. 
541990 - All other professional, scientific and technical services. 
Small business size standards: $6.5 million maximum revenues. 
517410 - Satellite telecommunications; 
517910 - Other telecommunications. 
Small business size standards: $13.5 million maximum revenues. 
517510 - Cable and other program distributions. 

Tier: Two; 
North American Industry Classification System Codes and Type of 
Service: 518111 - Internet service providers; 
518210 - Data processing, hosting and related services. 
541511 - Custom computer programming services. 
541512 - Computer system design services. 
541513 - Computer facilities management services. 
541519 - Computer related services. 
Small business size standards: $23 million maximum revenues. 
516110 - Internet publishing and broadcasting; 
Small business size standards: 500 maximum employees (regardless of 
revenue). 

Tier: Three; 
North American Industry Classification System Codes and Type of 
Service: 517110 - Wired telecommunications carriers; 
517211 - Paging. 
517212 - Cellular and other wireless telecommunications. 
517310 - Telecommunications resellers. 
Small business size standards: 1,500 maximum employees (regardless of 
revenue). 

Source: Commerce (data); GAO (presentation). 

Notes: Revenue size standards effective December 2005. 
Revenue values are averaged over 3 years. 
The number of employees is calculated on an average, 12-month basis. 
Businesses may not exceed the size standards to be considered a small 
business. 

[End of table] 

Our review of other small-business GWACs found that the COMMITS NexGen 
tier structure is unique. GSA manages a number of GWACs intended for 
small businesses. These GWACs are not structured into tiers and require 
contractors to meet the specific small business NAICS code(s) for the 
task order. 

* The 8(a) Streamlined Technology Acquisition Resources for Services 
(STARS) and the Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) 
GWACs are small business set-aside contracts for technology solutions. 
The GWACs are structured according to distinct functional areas 
designated by the NAICS codes. The small business contractors must meet 
the small business size standard for the appropriate functional area. 
Each task order is then identified for a specific functional area. 

* GSA is also in the process of awarding two additional small business 
GWACs. The Veterans Technology Services (VETS) GWAC designed to provide 
worldwide information technology solutions to federal agencies and 
Alliant Small Business, a broadly scoped contract offering a suite of 
information technology services. Both of these GWACs use only one 
qualifying NAICS code, 541512-computer systems design services, which 
has a size standard of $23 million. 

Some Businesses Have Grown Substantially: 

Some businesses have grown substantially.[Footnote 5] As shown in table 
2, we found 16 (over 27 percent) of the COMMITS NexGen contractors do 
not meet the small business size standards for their current tier, or 
in some cases, any tier. 

Table 2: Contractor Eligibility Based on Current Size Information: 

Tier: One; 
Current number of contractors: 20; 
Current size falls in another tier: 5; 
Current size does not meet any tier size: 1. 

Tier: Two; 
Current number of contractors: 27; 
Current size falls in another tier: 3; 
Current size does not meet any tier size: 4. 

Tier: Three; 
Current number of contractors: 8; 
Current size falls in another tier: 0; 
Current size does not meet any tier size: 3. 

Tier: Total; 
Current number of contractors: 55; 
Current size falls in another tier: 8; 
Current size does not meet any tier size: 8. 

Source: Commerce, CCR, public available information (data); GAO 
(analysis and presentation). 

[End of table] 

We also found that six small businesses have been acquired or merged 
with large contractors, but small business size recertification did not 
occur. 

Recent studies by the SBA's Office of the Inspector General, SBA's 
Office of Advocacy, and our own review have found that agencies are 
counting awards to large firms toward their small business procurement 
goals. In May 2003, we reported that large companies are reported as 
small businesses on contracts such as GWACs.[Footnote 6] Regulations 
allow companies to be considered small over the life of the contract 
even if the company has grown into a large business or been acquired by 
a large company. 

SBA's Recertification Rules: 

In April 2003, SBA published a proposed rule requiring contractors that 
receive a multiple award contract (such as a GWAC) to certify annually 
on the anniversary date of the contract award to continue to be 
considered a small business for a specified size standard.[Footnote 7] 
As of May 2006, this rule has not been finalized. 

* Commerce officials suggested that annual recertification would reduce 
COMMITS' effectiveness. 

* A small business representative said that allowing large businesses 
to qualify as small businesses could deprive small businesses of 
contract opportunities. 

SBA issued a final rule amending its small business size determinations 
effective December 21, 2004, which requires that at the time a novation 
or change-of-name agreement has been executed, the new entity must 
submit a written self-certification that it is small.[Footnote 8] If 
the acquisition or merger does not result in contract novation or name 
change, a business concern need not recertify. 

COMMITS NexGen contractors are required to recertify their small 
business size after the initial 3 years and prior to the exercise of 
the options to extend the GWAC period for an additional year. We found 
that GSA also requires its small business contractors to recertify 
prior to exercising any options. However, this time frame can vary 
between 2 to 5 years, depending on the contract. Agency officials may 
request size recertification for individual task orders. 

Task Orders May Be Issued to Businesses Not Meeting Size Standards: 

Not Using NAICS Codes May Result in Overstating Small Business 
Accomplishments: 

We found cases in which contractors may be receiving task orders and 
not meeting the small business size standards because: 

* incumbent contractors are allowed to compete for lower tier work; 
and: 

* individual task orders do not identify a specific NAICS code and the 
corresponding small business size standard. 

Incumbent contractors in COMMITS NexGen are permitted to compete for 
task orders designated for lower tier competition, even if the 
incumbents exceed the size standards for the designated tier of 
competition. 

As shown in figure 1, only about 30 percent of the total value of 
COMMITS NexGen orders was placed for competition in tiers one and two. 

Figure 1: Dollar Value of Task Orders Meeting Tier Level Criteria: 

[See PDF for Image] 

[End of Figure] 

As shown in figure 2, task orders were issued to incumbent contractors 
exceeding the size standards. 

Figure 2: Percent of Total Task Orders Won by Higher Tier Incumbent 
Contractors: 

[See PDF for Image] 

[End of Figure] 

Not Using NAICS Codes May Result in Overstating Small Business 
Accomplishments: 

COMMITS NexGen task orders are not assigned NAICS codes. Not assigning 
NAICS codes to task orders can result in orders being issued to 
businesses not meeting the specific size standard for that type of 
service. Because competition for task orders is based on the total 
value of the order and not on the type of service size standard, 
contractors are allowed to compete for work with smaller size 
standards. If won, the task order is recorded as going to a small 
business. 

* Tier three contractors can compete for any task orders valued greater 
than $40 million. 

* Tier two contractors can compete for any task orders valued greater 
than $5 million. 

* Task orders with a value of $5 million or less are reserved for tier 
one contractors. 

We found evidence that suggests that task orders may be issued to 
contractors not meeting the size standards for the category of work. 

SBA recognized that multiple award contracts, including GWACs, have 
multiple NAICS codes with different small business size standards. In 
April 2003, SBA proposed that contracting officers must assign an 
appropriate NAICS code to each order issued under a GWAC to help ensure 
that, when applicable, a contractor is a small business.[Footnote 9] As 
of May 2006, a final rule had not been issued. 

Primary Small Business Size Standard Is $23 Million in Revenue: 

We determined that the primary NAICS codes for computer-related 
services and software development have a small business size standard 
of $23 million. 

We determined that all but one of the 19 task orders (valued at over 
$419 million) would most likely have been categorized as computer 
related services and software development having a small business size 
standard of $23 million. 

Based on public information, we found 31 (over 56 percent) of the 55 
contractors currently exceed the $23 million size standards (table 3). 

Table 3: COMMITS NexGen Contractors Currently Meeting $23 million Size 
Standard: 

COMMITS contractors by tier: Tier one (20); 
Currently meet $23 million NAICS codes: 18; 
Currently exceed $23 million NAICS codes: 2. 

COMMITS contractors by tier: Tier two (27); 
Currently meet $23 million NAICS codes: 6; 
Currently exceed $23 million NAICS codes: 21. 

COMMITS contractors by tier: Tier three (8); 
Currently meet $23 million NAICS codes: 0; 
Currently exceed $23 million NAICS codes: 8. 

COMMITS contractors by tier: Total (55); 
Currently meet $23 million NAICS codes: 24; 
Currently exceed $23 million NAICS codes: 31. 

Source: Commerce (data); GAO (analysis and presentation). 

[End of table] 

Effect of Not Using NAICS Codes in Individual Task Orders Overstates 
Small Business Accomplishments: 

Only five of the task orders have been issued to contractors that 
currently meet the $23 million size standard (falling under tiers one 
and two). 

Eleven of the task orders were issued to contractors certified as small 
businesses under size standards for 500 or 1,500 employees (falling 
under tiers two and three). 

92 percent of the total value of task orders issued went to contractors 
currently exceeding the $23 million size standard. 

Effectiveness of Internal Controls and Oversight Is Unclear: 

The COMMITS NexGen ordering guide and business plan include oversight 
and internal control procedures to: 

* ensure the task is appropriate for small business, prior to issuance 
of any task orders; 

* establish a risk management approach to monitor cost, schedule, and 
performance measurement throughout the life of this program; 

* require random post-award reviews of task orders; 

* place emphasis on ensuring the fair-opportunity competition is 
received and that task order prices are fair and reasonable; 

* require agency's contracting officers to attend training prior to 
receiving delegation of procurement authority; 

* require task orders to include performance metrics that are modified 
annually; and: 

* establish a fee structure that is monitored and assessed on an annual 
basis to determine whether it is in alignment with program cost. 

However, it is unclear whether these controls are in place. 

* The program office was not able to document the 55 contractors' small 
business size certifications and contacted the contractors to obtain 
these certifications during our review. 

* At the time we completed our review, certifications were not obtained 
from nine contractors. 

* We identified six contractors that were placed in tiers lower than 
those for which they had certified. The program office was not aware 
that the six contractors inadvertently certified under incorrect NAICS 
codes. However, the program office believes that the contractors were 
placed in the correct tiers. Based on our review, the contracting 
officer has requested that contractors recertify immediately under the 
proper NAICS code. 

* In addition, the program has only issued 19 task orders, most within 
the past year. 

The program has not developed performance measures to ensure that that 
the program is meeting its goals. Appropriate performance measures help 
ensure that policies and processes are implemented and have the desired 
outcomes. 

* Program office officials stated that COMMITS NexGen specific 
performance data will be collected starting this fiscal year. 

(120567): 

FOOTNOTES 

[1] At the time of a novation or change of name agreement, the Small 
Business Administration regulations (Title 13, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Section 121.404(i)) require contractors to submit a 
written self-certification in order for the agency to count the award 
or orders issued pursuant to the contract towards its small business 
goals. 

[2] H.R. Rep. No. 109-272, p. 165. 

[3] Central Contractor Registration (CCR) is the primary vendor 
database for the federal government. CCR collects, validates, stores, 
and disseminates data in support of agency acquisition missions. Both 
current and potential federal government vendors are required to 
register in CCR in order to be awarded contracts by the federal 
government. The SBA's Dynamic Small Business database is generally a 
self-certifying database. The SBA does not make any representation as 
to the accuracy of any of the data included, other than certifications 
relating to 8(a) Business Development, HUBZone or Small Disadvantaged 
Business status. 

[4] NAICS codes classify commercial activity into industry categories, 
e.g., internet service providers, computer system design services, and 
wireless telecommunications. 

[5] For example, a tier one contractor, whose revenues should not 
exceed $13.5 million, now has projected revenues of $150 million for 
2006. A tier three contractor, who should not have more than 1,500 
employees, had over 4,000 employees in 2005. 

[6] GAO, Contract Management: Reporting of Small Business Contract 
Awards Does Not Reflect Current Business Size, GAO-03-704T (Washington, 
D.C.: May 7, 2003). 

[7] 68 Fed. Reg. 20350. 

[8] 69 Fed. Reg. 29192 (implemented at 13 CFR 121.404(i)), 29198. 

[9] 68 Fed. Reg. 20350, 20355. 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of 
Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional 
responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability 
of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use 
of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides 
analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make 
informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's commitment to 
good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, 
integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through the Internet. GAO's Web site ( www.gao.gov ) contains 
abstracts and full-text files of current reports and testimony and an 
expanding archive of older products. The Web site features a search 
engine to help you locate documents using key words and phrases. You 
can print these documents in their entirety, including charts and other 
graphics. 

Each day, GAO issues a list of newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence. GAO posts this list, known as "Today's Reports," on its 
Web site daily. The list contains links to the full-text document 
files. To have GAO e-mail this list to you every afternoon, go to 
www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to e-mail alerts" under the "Order 
GAO Products" heading. 

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to: 

U.S. Government Accountability Office 

441 G Street NW, Room LM 

Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To order by Phone: 

Voice: (202) 512-6000: 

TDD: (202) 512-2537: 

Fax: (202) 512-6061: 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm 

E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov 

Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Public Affairs: 

Jeff Nelligan, managing director, 

NelliganJ@gao.gov 

(202) 512-4800 

U.S. Government Accountability Office, 

441 G Street NW, Room 7149 

Washington, D.C. 20548: