This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-03-776R 
entitled 'Reporting of Small Business Contract Awards Does Not Reflect 
Current Business Size' which was released on May 07, 2003.

This text file was formatted by the U.S. General Accounting Office 
(GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a 
longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately.

May 7, 2003:

The Honorable Olympia J. Snowe:

Chair, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship:

United States Senate:

Subject: Reporting of Small Business Contract Awards Does Not Reflect 
Current Business Size:


Dear Madam Chair:

We have prepared this report in response to your concerns about whether 
large companies are receiving federal contracts intended for small 
businesses. As agreed with your staff, we reviewed awards to five large 
companies to determine:

* how contracts awarded to the companies were reported in Federal 
Procurement Data System (FPDS),[Footnote 1]

* why federal contract officials reported the contracts as small 
business awards, and:

* what actions are being taken to address any identified problems.

This report transmits information provided to your staff in earlier 
briefings and in our testimony given today before the Small Business 
Committee of the House of Representatives, which we have enclosed. We 
conducted our review between November 2002 and May 2003 in accordance 
with generally accepted auditing standards. A description of our scope 
and methodology is included in the enclosure.

The five large companies that we reviewed received contracts totaling 
$1.1 billion in fiscal year 2001, including $460 million reported as 
small business awards. To understand why awards to these large 
companies were listed in FPDS as small business awards, we focused our 
review on 131 individual contract actions awarded to these companies by 
four federal buying activities.

The predominant reason why these contract actions were reported as 
small business awards is because federal regulations generally permit a 
company to be considered as a small business over the life of the 
contract--even if they have grown into a large business, merged with 
another company, or been acquired by a large business. In today's 
federal contracting environment, contracts can extend up to 20 years. 
Additionally, agencies' reliance on various databases containing 
inaccurate information on current business size has led to misreporting 
of small business achievements.

The General Services Administration, the Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy, and the Small Business Administration have each taken or 
proposed a number of actions aimed at requiring small businesses to re-
certify and not retain their small business status for the life of the 
contract. While these proposed actions do not directly address the 
database problems we identified at the four federal buying activities, 
there are a number of initiatives under way designed to improve federal 
contract databases.

We have not made recommendations; however, we have noted the need for 
accurate and consistent data on companies' business size in order to 
reliably report small business contract awards. We believe a 
coordinated effort between agencies is necessary to ensure that 
accurate and reliable small business data are reported.

If you have any further questions concerning this report, please 
contact me on (617) 788-0500. Individuals making key contributions to 
this report include Robert Ackley, Penny Berrier, Chris Galvin, Julia 
Kennon, Judy Lasley, John Needham, Russ Reiter, Sylvia Schatz, and 
Karen Sloan.

Sincerely yours,

David E. Cooper:

Signed by David E. Cooper:

Director:

Acquisition and Sourcing Management:

Enclosure:

FOOTNOTES

[1] FPDS is the government's central repository of statistical 
information on federal contracting. The system contains detailed 
information on contract actions over $25,000 and summary data on 
procurements of less than $25,000.