This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-03-399R 
entitled 'OFPP Followup to Federal Supply Schedule Recommendations' 
which was released on January 31, 2003.



This text file was formatted by the U.S. General Accounting Office 

(GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a 

longer term project to improve GAO products’ accessibility. Every 

attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 

the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 

descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 

end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 

but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 

version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 

replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 

your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 

document to Webmaster@gao.gov.



January 31, 2003:



Ms. Angela B. Styles:



Administrator:



Office of Federal Procurement Policy:



Washington, D.C.



Subject: OFPP Followup to Federal Supply Schedule Recommendations:



Dear Ms. Styles:



This report is to bring to your attention two GAO recommendations 

concerning the acquisition of information technology services under the 

Federal Supply Schedule (FSS). In our view, implementation of these 

recommendations has been delayed because of unnecessary coupling with 

other FSS issues.



In November 2000, we reported[Footnote 1] that contracting officers did 

not follow FSS ordering procedures requiring them to seek competitive 

quotes for services. We found that many contracting officers were 

unaware of the requirement. Hence, we recommended, and the Office of 

Federal Procurement Policy agreed, that the requirement for competitive 

quotes should be included in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). 

We also recommended clarification of the FAR pertaining to sole source 

orders for services using the FSS. Although a FAR case has been opened, 

little progress has been made in implementing the recommendations. 

Moreover, the latest informal estimate indicates that a final rule will 

not be published until April 2004.



We are concerned about the delay because sales of services under the 

FSS continue to substantially increase. Moreover, recent federal audits 

suggest that the problems still exist. For example, in March 2002, the 

Office of Inspector General, National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, found that contracting officers did not follow the 

ordering procedures for services in 8 of 20 reviewed contracts with 

regard to obtaining multiple quotes or providing sufficient information 

in the request for quotation or statement of work.[Footnote 2]



Also, in November 2002, the Department of Defense, Office of Inspector 

General, reported that in 36 of 44 orders for services contracting 

officials could not show that they followed FAR procedures for the 

Federal Supply Schedule or that they had requested quotes from multiple 

contractors as required by the Government Services Administration 

ordering procedures.[Footnote 3] Although the competitive quotes issue 

has been addressed in part by recent changes to the Defense FAR 

Supplement, a FAR revision is necessary for a comprehensive 

implementation of the recommendation.



We understand that the delay in implementation is the result of efforts 

to address matters other than the need to obtain competitive quotes. 

For example, one issue has been whether the use of time-and-materials 

contracts should be allowed under the Federal Supply Schedule.



We believe the guidance concerning competitive quotes and sole source 

awards for services should be incorporated into the FAR before 

resolving other issues. More importantly, we believe that this would 

provide a foundation for immediate improvements in the use of FSS 

contracts.



We are also sending copies of this report to officials at the General 

Services Administration. The report will be available at no charge on 

the GAO Web site, www.gao.gov. If you have any questions about this 

report, please contact me at (202) 512-4841 or Ralph Dawn at (202) 512-

4544.



Sincerely yours,



David E. Cooper:



Director:



Acquisition and Sourcing Management:



Signed by David E. Cooper



(120201):







FOOTNOTES



[1] U.S. General Accounting Office, Contract Management: Not Following 

Procedures Undermines Best Pricing Under GSA’s Schedule, GAO-01-125 

(Washington, D.C.: Nov. 28, 2000).



[2] Office of Inspector General, National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, NASA Acquisition of Services Using the Federal Supply 

Schedules, Report Number IG-02-014 (Washington, D.C.: Mar. 27, 2002).



[3] Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Defense, 

Acquisition: Contract Actions Awarded to Small Businesses, Report 

Number D-2003-029 (Washington, D.C.: November 25, 2002).