This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-03-221R 
entitled 'United States Coast Guard: Implementation of the Inflation 
Adjustment Act' which was released on November 1, 
2002. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

November 1, 2002: 

The Honorable Norman Y. Mineta: 
The Secretary of Transportation: 

Subject: United States Coast Guard: Implementation of the Inflation 
Adjustment Act Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Earlier this year, we initiated a governmentwide review of the 
implementation of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act 
of 1990, as amended (Inflation Adjustment Act).[Footnote 1] The 
Inflation Adjustment Act required each federal agency to issue a 
regulation adjusting its covered maximum and minimum civil monetary 
penalties for inflation by October 23, 1996, and requires them to make 
necessary adjustments at least once every 4 years thereafter. During 
our review, we determined that the United States Coast Guard published 
its first round of penalty adjustments in 1997, but has not published a 
second round of adjustments for 56 eligible penalties. This report is 
intended to bring this matter to your attention and to recommend 
corrective action. 

The Coast Guard Has Not Published a Second Round of Adjustments for 
Eligible Penalties: 

Under the Inflation Adjustment Act, the Coast Guard (like other covered 
federal agencies) was required to publish a regulation by October 23, 
1996, adjusting its maximum civil penalties for inflation. The act 
requires those inflation adjustments to be based on changes in the 
Consumer Price Index (CPI) from June of the calendar year in which the 
penalties were last set or adjusted through June of the year prior to 
the adjustment. The statute also includes precise rules for rounding 
penalty increases. For example, the statute provides that penalty 
increases must be rounded to the nearest “multiple of $1,000 in the 
case of penalties greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to 
$10,000.” The statute limited the first adjustments of an agency’s 
penalties to 10 percent of the penalty amounts. It also requires 
agencies to examine their penalties at least once every 4 years and, if 
necessary, make additional inflation adjustments. 

On April 8, 1997, the Coast Guard published a final rule making its 
first penalty adjustments under the Inflation Adjustment Act.[Footnote 
2] The agency subsequently published two rule corrections to address 
“errors which may prove to be misleading and are in need of correction 
or clarification,” with the final publication taking effect on July 1, 
1997.[Footnote 3] In the last rule, the agency identified 127 covered 
civil penalties and adjusted 122 of them for inflation.[Footnote 4] As 
table 1 shows, the 122 penalties after the 1997 adjustments were at 16 
different penalty amounts ranging from $22 to $137,500. The table also 
shows that the amount of inflation needed to trigger another penalty 
increase ranges from 3.6 percent to 45.5 percent, depending on the size 
of the penalty and the applicable rule for rounding penalty increases. 

Table 1: The Coast Guard Can Readjust Nearly Half of the Civil 
Penalties That Were Initially Adjusted in 1997: 

Penalty: $22; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
1; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 22.8; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: $55; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
2; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 22.8; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: Yes. 

Penalty: 110; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
9; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 45.5; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 185; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
1; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 27.1; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 220; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
7; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 22.8; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 550; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
15; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 9.1; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: Yes. 

Penalty: 1,100; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
18; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 45.5; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 2,200; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
2; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 22.8; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 3,300; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
1; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 15.2; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 5,500; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
22; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 9.1; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: Yes. 

Penalty: 11,000; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
23; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 22.8; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 22,000; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
4; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 11.4; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: No. 

Penalty: 27,500; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
13; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 9.1; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: No; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: Yes. 

Penalty: 55,000; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
1; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 4.6; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: Yes; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: Yes. 

Penalty: 110,000; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
1; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 4.6; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: Yes; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: Yes. 

Penalty: 137,500; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
2; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: 3.7; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: Yes; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: YEs. 

Total; 
Number of penalties at this penalty amount that were adjusted in 1997: 
122; 
Percentage of increase in inflation needed to trigger another 
adjustment: [Empty]; 
Were penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2001?: 4 
Eligible; 
Are penalties at this amount eligible for adjustment in 2002?: 56 
Eligible. 

Source: GAO analysis of Coast Guard data. 

Note: The penalty that the Coast Guard adjusted to $185 in 1997 was 
increased more than the 10 percent permitted by the Inflation 
Adjustment Act for first-round adjustments (from $150), and therefore 
should have only increased to $165. 

[End of table]

By July 2001 (4 years after the first round of adjustments took 
effect), the Coast Guard should have examined its civil penalties and 
adjusted those eligible under the statute. For those penalties 
initially adjusted in 1997, the Coast Guard should have used the 
percentage change in the CPI that occurred from June 1997 through June 
2000 (about 7.5 percent) to calculate the size of the unrounded 
increase. As table 1 shows, 4 of the 122 Coast Guard penalties that 
were adjusted in 1997 were eligible for a second adjustment by July 
2001. However, as of the date of this letter, the Coast Guard has not 
readjusted these penalties. 

By January 2002, the Coast Guard could have used the amount of 
inflation that occurred from June 1997 through June 2001 (about 11 
percent) to determine which of its penalties adjusted in 1997 were 
eligible for adjustment under the Inflation Adjustment Act. As table 1 
shows, 56 of the 122 penalties adjusted in 1997 were eligible (and are 
currently eligible) for a second adjustment. Coast Guard officials told 
us during our review that the agency had not yet made a second round of 
penalty adjustments because of personnel turnover, staffing reductions, 
and reorganizations. 

Recommendation for Executive Action: 

We recommend that the Secretary of Transportation direct the Commandant 
of the Coast Guard to initiate a regulatory action as soon as possible 
to adjust eligible civil penalties in a manner consistent with the 
requirements of the Inflation Adjustment Act. 

Agency Comments and Our Evaluation: 

On October 22, 2002, we provided a draft of this report to the 
Secretary of Transportation for his review and comment. We did not 
receive any formal comments on the draft report from either the 
Department of Transportation or the Coast Guard. However, Coast Guard 
officials told us that the agency would begin developing new civil 
penalty regulations in January 2003.

We are sending copies of this report to the Commandant of the Coast 
Guard and to appropriate congressional committees. It will also be 
available at no charge on GAO’s Web site at [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov]. If you or your staff have any questions on the 
matters discussed in this letter, you may contact Curtis Copeland or me 
at (202) 512- 6806. John Tavares was a major contributor to this 
report. 

Sincerely, 

Signed by: 

Victor S. Rezendes: 
Managing Director: 
Strategic Issues: 

[End of section] 

Footnotes: 

[1] The Inflation Adjustment Act is codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. 
The 1990 act was amended in 1996 by the Debt Collection Improvement 
Act, which added the requirement for agencies to adjust their civil
penalties by regulation (Pub. L. 104-134, Sec. 31001, 110 Stat. 1321-
373). 

[2] See 62 Fed. Reg. 16695. 

[3] See 62 Fed. Reg. 31339 (June 9, 1997) and 62 Fed. Reg. 35385 (July 
1, 1997).

[4] The Coast Guard did not adjust four penalties because, under the 
rounding rules, they did not qualify for adjustment: (1) a $2,000 
penalty (codified at 46 U.S.C. 3318(j)(1)) that was last set in 1990, 
(2) a $3,000 penalty (codified at 14 U.S.C. 645(i)) that was last set 
in 1992, (3) a $25,000 penalty (codified at 46 U.S.C. 8906) that was 
last set in 1996, and (4) a $1,000 penalty that was set in 1996 
(codified at 46 U.S.C. 2115) and that was adjusted in 1998 to $5,000 by 
Public Law 105-383. The Coast Guard also did not adjust a $2,500 
penalty (codified at 33 U.S.C. 1236(d)) that should have been adjusted 
to $2,750. Therefore, it is currently eligible for a 10-percent 
increase. 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each 
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly 
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] 
and select "Subscribe to Updates." 

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to: 

U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room LM: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To order by Phone: 
Voice: (202) 512-6000: 
TDD: (202) 512-2537: 
Fax: (202) 512-6061: 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: 
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, JarmonG@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4400: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7125: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Jeff Nelligan, Managing Director, AndersonP1@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4800: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7149: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: