This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-02-553R
entitled 'Defense Management: Need to Fully Recognize Ammunition
Demilitarization Liability' which was released on April 5, 2002. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. General Accounting Office 
(GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a 
longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the 
printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact 
electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. 
Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or accessibility 
features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

GAO-02-553R: 

United States General Accounting Office: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

April 5, 2002: 

The Honorable Donald H. Rumsfeld: 
The Secretary of Defense: 

Subject: Defense Management: Need to Fully Recognize Ammunition
Demilitarization Liability: 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

In April 2001, we reported[Footnote 1] that the demilitarization 
liability associated with excess ammunition was not reflected in the 
Department of Defense's (DOD) financial statements, even though 
federal financial accounting standards[Footnote 2] require recognition 
and reporting of liabilities associated with disposal. We recommended 
that DOD include the total liability associated with demilitarizing 
excess ammunition in its annual financial statements. In response, the 
Army, as the single manager for conventional ammunition, calculated an 
estimated demilitarization liability of approximately $1.2 billion and 
prepared a voucher recognizing this amount in its accounting records 
on February 25, 2002. An Army official told us it would use this 
accounting entry as a basis for including this amount in both the 
Army's and DOD's fiscal year 2002 annual consolidated balance sheets. 
This estimate was based on the Army Operations Support Command's 
demilitarization stockpile plus the forecast of expected additions to 
the stockpile for the next 5 years. 

While the Army's actions are consistent with our recommendation, these 
actions do not reflect the full extent of future costs in this area 
necessary to fully comply with our recommendation. Specifically, the 
Army's actions do not recognize a liability for the costs associated 
with the demilitarization of (1) excess ammunition overseas (even 
though a portion of the demilitarization budget each year is used to 
demilitarize ammunition overseas) or (2) excess Army-owned war reserve 
ammunition, excess retail ammunition, and excess ammunition not stored 
at an Army installation. Our analysis of inventory records showed that 
the Army has an additional 94,030 tons of ammunition located overseas 
and 54,770 tons of unusable or unneeded ammunition at military storage 
sites in the United States that was not considered in determining the 
Army's estimate of the demilitarization liability to be included in 
both the Army's and DOD's fiscal year 2002 financial statements. Based 
on our analysis, we believe that the total demilitarization liability 
that should be reflected in the Army's and DOD's fiscal year 2002 
financial statements could amount to about $3 billon, or $1.8 billion 
more than the Army's calculation. 

If the liability associated with all excess ammunition is not 
accurately reflected in the Army's and DOD's financial statements and 
data regarding it made available for congressional budget 
deliberations, then DOD and Congress cannot prepare for the present 
and future costs associated with demilitarizing excess ammunition.
Therefore, consistent with our previous recommendation, the Army needs 
to submit an additional voucher and include in both its and DOD's 
fiscal year 2002 consolidated balance sheets the future liability 
associated with the demilitarization of excess Army ammunition at 
overseas and military storage locations. With this additional 
recognition and reporting the Army's and DOD's financial statements 
will more accurately reflect the total liability associated with 
demilitarizing excess ammunition. 

We are sending copies of this letter to the appropriate congressional 
committees and the director, Office of Management and Budget. The 
letter is also available on GAO's homepage at [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov]. If you or your staff have any questions on the 
matters discussed in this letter, please contact either of us at (202) 
512-4300 or (202) 512-2600, respectively. Key contributors to this 
letter were Barry Holman, Ron Berteotti, Roger Tomlinson, and Geoff 
Frank. 

Signed by: 

Henry L. Hinton, Jr. 
Managing Director: 
Defense Capabilities and Management: 

Signed by: 

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff: 
Managing Director: 
Financial Management and Assurance: 

[End of section] 

Footnotes: 

[1] U.S. General Accounting Office, Defense Inventory: Steps the Army 
Can Take to Improve the Management and Oversight of Excess Ammunition, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-01-372] (Washington, D.C.: 
Apr. 12, 2001). 

[2] Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, 
Accounting for Liabilities of the Federal Government, and No. 6, 
Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment. 

[End of section]