This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-07-201 
entitled 'Trade Adjustment Assistance: New Program for Farmers Provides 
Some Assistance, but Has Had Limited Participation and Low Program 
Expenditures' which was released on January 18, 2007. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 

GAO: 

December 2006: 

Trade Adjustment Assistance: 

New Program for Farmers Provides Some Assistance, but Has Had Limited 
Participation and Low Program Expenditures: 

GAO-07-201: 

Contents: 

Letter: 

Appendix I: Briefing slides: 

Appendix II: Cash Payment Formula: 

Appendix III: GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments: 

Related GAO Products: 

Tables: 

Table 1: Adjustment Assistance Payment Formula: 

Table 2: Examples of USDA Cash Payments: 

Figure: 

Figure 1: Salmon and Shrimp Producers Received 92 Percent of Payment 
Funds, Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005: 

Abbreviations: 

CSREES: Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service: 
ERS: Economic Research Service: 
FAS: Foreign Agricultural Service: 
FSA: Farm Service Agency: 
PRC: Petition Review Committee: 
TAA: Trade Adjustment Assistance: 
USDA: United States Department of Agriculture: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

December 18, 2006: 

The Honorable Charles E. Grassley: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Max Baucus: 
Ranking Minority Member: 
Committee on Finance: 
United States Senate: 

While tens of thousands of manufacturing workers have received services 
through the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program, until 2002, 
farmers and fishermen impacted by imports did not have access to 
similar assistance. The Trade Act of 2002 (Trade Act) established a new 
program, TAA for Farmers, administered by the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) to provide technical assistance, a cash payment of 
up to $10,000 a year, and access to Department of Labor (Labor) 
training and reemployment services for farmers and fishermen who face 
significant price declines due to increased imports. The Trade Act 
provides for up to $90 million each year through fiscal year 2007 for 
the costs to carry out the program. Trade Act programs are due for 
reauthorization in 2007. 

To be eligible for benefits, farmers and fishermen--called producers-- 
must complete a two-part process each year.[Footnote 1] First, a group 
of producers of a commodity must submit a petition to USDA on behalf of 
all producers in one or more states. The petition must demonstrate that 
the price of the commodity for the most recent marketing year declined 
by at least 20 percent from the average price for the previous 5 years 
and that imports contributed importantly to the decline in price. If 
USDA certifies the petition, any producer of that commodity in the 
region covered by the petition may then apply for benefits under the 
program. Individual producers must meet additional conditions to 
receive cash payments. For example, their net farm or fishing income 
must be less in the petition year than it was in the previous 
year.[Footnote 2] 

The TAA for Farmers program was first authorized in 2002, and no 
comprehensive review has been completed to guide reauthorizing the 
program. To help prepare for reauthorization, you asked us to assess 
the status of implementation of the TAA for Farmers program. 
Specifically, we examined: (1) how the USDA promotes the TAA for 
Farmers program and the extent to which the agency has received and 
certified petitions from producers, (2) the extent to which 
participants have received benefits, including technical assistance and 
cash payments, and (3) what is known about the results of the program. 
To respond to these issues, we interviewed USDA program officials 
involved with implementing TAA for Farmers, analyzed USDA program data 
on petitions, payments, and technical assistance from fiscal years 2004-
2006, and reviewed the results from a 2006 survey of TAA for Farmers 
participants conducted by Washington State University Extension for 
USDA's risk management education centers.[Footnote 3] We conducted our 
work from August 2006 to October 2006 in accordance with generally 
accepted government auditing standards. 

On October 24, 2006, we briefed your staffs on the results of our work. 
This report formally conveys the information provided during that 
briefing. Appendix I contains the briefing slides. 

In summary, we found that, while USDA uses various means to promote TAA 
for Farmers, the numbers of both petition submissions and 
certifications are lower in fiscal year 2006 than they were in 2005. 
USDA officials attribute the decline to the difficulty farmers and 
fishermen have in meeting the eligibility criteria. Out of 101 
petitions submitted for the program to date, USDA reviewed the 64 that 
were complete, appropriate and timely. Of these, 30 petitions were 
certified and 34 were denied. Producers of Concord grapes, lychees, 
olives, wild blueberries, fresh potatoes, Florida avocados, 
snapdragons, shrimp, salmon, and catfish were among those that were 
certified under the program. The number of petitions submitted by 
producers declined by nearly half from fiscal year 2004 to 2006, while 
the number of petitions USDA denied more than doubled between 2005 and 
2006. Most of the petitions that were denied were up for 
recertification and no longer met key program eligibility criteria. 
Officials attribute this to two factors--the requirement to demonstrate 
a 20-percent price decline and the requirement to show a further 
increase in imports for petitions up for recertification. For example, 
in 2006, 14 of the 15 petitions that were denied were up for 
recertification and were not recertified because imports did not 
increase over the previous year's level. 

While USDA provides technical assistance to producers, the amount of 
cash payments made to producers has been relatively small and, 
according to program officials, some program eligibility criteria may 
limit their participation. To date, about 13,000 producers have 
received technical assistance; USDA has provided about 8,000 cash 
payments; and few producers--estimated at 3 percent or less--have taken 
advantage of Labor's training and reemployment services. [Footnote 4], 
[Footnote 5] USDA's Cooperative State Research, Education, and 
Extension Service (CSREES) provides technical assistance through 
various means-in person, online, and through training materials-to 
producers nationwide, and has implemented a basic and an intensive 
technical assistance curriculum. The basic curriculum, which is 
mandatory for all certified producers who wish to receive a cash 
payment, provides a brief overview of world trade, business 
improvements producers can make, and other resources. The intensive 
curriculum, which was implemented in 2006, is optional, and provides 
individual one-on-one counseling to help producers develop and 
implement changes to their business. Of those who applied to receive 
cash payments, two-thirds received it. The median cash payment was 
relatively low: $1,605 in fiscal year 2004 and $2,520 in 2005, but 
fewer payments were made in 2005 compared to 2004. About 1,000 
payments, out of a total of about 8,000 payments, were at the maximum 
of $10,000. Salmon and shrimp producers received more than 90 percent 
of all payments in fiscal year 2004 and 2005 (see fig. 1). 

Figure 1: Salmon and Shrimp Producers Received 92 Percent of Payment 
Funds, Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

Note: Payments for fiscal years 2004 and 2005 totaled $28,056,454. 

[End of figure] 

Agency officials identified certain criteria in the legislation as 
factors that may affect individual participation. In particular, the 
net farm income test--that requires producers to show that income was 
less in the petition year than the previous year--may disqualify some 
producers who seek cash payments. In addition, the payment formula, 
which resulted in most producers receiving less than $3,000, may also 
discourage producers from participating.[Footnote 6] Low producer 
participation and low payments have resulted in USDA spending falling 
far below the $90 million provided for by the Trade Act--program 
spending totaled about $16 million in fiscal year 2004 and $21 million 
in 2005. Given the low expenditures, USDA only requests about one-third 
of the $90 million in its annual budget request. 

Producers were generally satisfied with the technical assistance and 
thought applying for the cash payment was worthwhile, according to a 
USDA survey of producers who applied for benefits in fiscal years 2004 
and 2005. Overall, at least half of the respondents found that the 
basic technical assistance training was worthwhile, and about a quarter 
of the respondents reported making changes to their business as a 
result of the assistance. Generally, respondents were satisfied with 
the quality of technical information they received on issues such as 
how to improve the marketing of their commodity. However, a substantial 
number of respondents reported that the basic curriculum provided 
inadequate information on some topics, such as how to evaluate other 
commodities as substitutions for their own. According to USDA 
officials, it was the need to provide additional assistance tailored to 
a specific business that resulted in the development of the intensive 
technical assistance curriculum. Regarding the cash payment, about 80- 
percent of respondents said the payment was worth the effort of 
applying, though slightly more than half of the producers said they 
experienced some difficulty in applying for and receiving a cash 
payment. However, the survey provides no insight into why some 
producers did not apply for benefits at all. 

In conclusion, TAA for Farmers is a new program and we have only an 
early view of how this program is working. While the cash benefits and 
technical assistance appear to assist farmers and fishermen in 
adjusting to the effects of import competition on a limited, short-term 
basis, the cash payments are relatively low and must be approved each 
year. Furthermore, the criteria for program eligibility are difficult 
for many farmers and fishermen to meet and the low cash payments may 
discourage others from applying. As a result, USDA spending for this 
program is well below the amount provided for by the Trade Act. 

We provided a draft of this report to officials at USDA for their 
technical review and incorporated their comments where appropriate. 

As arranged with your offices, unless you publicly announce the 
contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution of the 
report until 30 days from its issue date. At that time, we will send 
copies of this report to the Secretary of Agriculture, relevant 
congressional committees, and other interested parties and will make 
copies available to others upon request. The report will also be 
available at no charge on GAO's Web site at [Hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov]. 

If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please 
contact me at (202) 512-7215. You may also reach me by e-mail at 
nilsens@gao.gov. Key contributors may be found in appendix III. 

Signed by: 

Sigurd R. Nilsen: 
Director, Education, Workforce, and Income Security Issues: 

[End of section] 

Appendix I: Briefing slides: 

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers: 

Briefing for Staff of Senator Charles E. Grassley, Chairman Senate 
Committee on Finance and Senator Max Baucus, Ranking Member Senate 
Committee on Finance: 

October 24, 2006: 

Introduction: 

Until the Trade Act of 2002, farmers and fishermen impacted by 
increased imports typically could not benefit from trade adjustment 
assistance (TAA) under the Department of Labor's (Labor) TAA program 
for various reasons, including: 

* Farmers are generally self-employed and rarely qualify for 
unemployment benefits, and thus TAA benefits. 

* Agricultural producers are less likely than other workers to want to 
be retrained for a new occupation, which was the emphasis of Labor's 
TAA program. 

TAA for Farmers, established in the Trade Act of 2002, provides 
limited, short-term trade adjustment assistance specifically to farmers 
and fishermen through fiscal year 2007. 

No comprehensive review of the program is currently available to guide 
reauthorization. 

Research Objectives: 

How does the Department of Agriculture (USDA) promote the TAA for 
Farmers program and to what extent has the agency received and 
certified petitions from producers? 

To what extent have participants received benefits, including technical 
assistance and cash payments? 

What is known about the results of the program? 

Scope and Methodology: 

To address our research objectives, we: 

interviewed USDA program officials and Office of Inspector General 
staff; 

analyzed USDA program data on petitions, payments, and technical 
assistance from fiscal years 2004-2006; 

reviewed results from a 2006 survey of TAA for Farmers participants 
conducted by Washington State University for USDA's risk management 
education centers, which develop technical assistance for the program; 
and: 

conducted our review from August 2006 to October 2006 in accordance 
with generally accepted government auditing standards: 

Background: 

TAA for Farmers Legislation: 

The TAA Reform Act of 2002 established a new program of trade 
adjustment assistance for farmers, providing technical assistance, cash 
benefits, and access to training and reemployment services offered 
through the Department of Labor. 

To be eligible, producers (farmers and fishermen) must demonstrate 
significant price declines (of at least 20 percent) as a result of 
increased imports. 

The statute authorizes an appropriation of not more than $90 million 
for each fiscal year, from 2003 through 2007, to carry out the program. 

Producers Petition for a Commodity to Be Eligible for the Program: 

In order to receive benefits, a group of producers (three or more) or 
their authorized representatives must submit a petition to USDA. 

There may be many producers represented under one petition. Petitioners 
may file on behalf of all producers in an impacted area of one or more 
states in the United States. 

The petition must include data showing how the price of the commodity 
has declined, justification for why the producers should be eligible 
for assistance, and other information. 

Petitions may be considered for recertification in subsequent years. 

Conditions for Certification: 

USDA certifies, or approves, petitions that meet the following 
criteria: 

Average price of the commodity in the marketing year[Footnote 7] under 
review must be at least 20 percent less than the average price over the 
past 5 marketing years for which data are available: 

Imports of directly competing products must have increased during the 
petition period: 

Increase in imports must have "contributed importantly" to the price 
decrease: 

Petition must be submitted to USDA between August 15 and January 31 of 
the following year: 

USDA Agency Roles: 

USDA Agency: Foreign Agriculture Service (FAS); 
Responsibilities for TAA for Farmers: 
* Lead agency for administering the program; 
* Receives and reviews petitions; 
* Determines producers' eligibility to apply for TAA benefits. 

USDA Agency: Economic Research Service (ERS); 
Responsibilities for TAA for Farmers: Conducts market study of each 
petition. 

USDA Agency: Petition Review Committee (PRC); 
Responsibilities for TAA for Farmers: Intra-agency committee that 
reviews ERS study and petition and makes recommendation to FAS 
administrator. 

USDA Agency: farm Service Agency (FSA); 
Responsibilities for TAA for Farmers: 
* Assists petitioners in completing applications for cash payments; 
* Provides outreach service to petitioners and producers; 
* Accepts applications and determines producers' cash payment 
eligibility; 
* Makes payments to all eligible producers. 

USDA Agency: Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension 
Service (CSREES); 
Responsibilities for TAA for Farmers: Provides technical assistance to 
producers. 

[End of table] 

USDA Petition Process: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA information. 

[End of Figure] 

Producers of Certified Commodities Must Apply to Receive Benefits: 

After USDA certifies a petition, any producer of that commodity wishing 
to receive benefits must apply to receive the following benefits: 

* technical assistance training to improve competitiveness and 
marketability of the adversely affected commodity and to assess 
feasibility of substituting a new commodity and: 

* annual cash payment for those who meet criteria each year: 

Producers who are eligible for cash payments may also be eligible for 
career training and reemployment services through Labor: 

Producers Must Meet Additional Conditions to Receive Cash Payments: 

Eligible producers include qualified fishermen or owners, operators, 
landlords, tenants, or sharecroppers who share in the risk of producing 
a commodity and are entitled to share in the crop available for 
marketing from the farm: 

Producers must provide documentation that: 

*  Net farm or net fishing g income was less than what it was in the 
previous year[Footnote 8]  

* Average gross revenue was less than $2.5 million for the last 3 
years: 

* They received the technical assistance program provided by USDA's 
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES): 

Producers' Cash Benefits Are Capped: 

Each producer can receive no more than $10,000 in TAA payments per 
federal fiscal year. 

Each producer must receive less than $65,000 a year in both TAA 
payments and countercyclical payments, which are another form of 
federal farm income support for certain commodities. 

Payments are based on a standard formula, which is designed to replace 
a portion of the lost income from a price decline. 

Payment Application Process: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA information. 

[End of figure] 

Objective 1: Petitions: 

USDA Promotes Program through Federal Register, Local Media and Other 
Means: 

The Foreign Agricultural Service announces the petition process through 
a Federal Register notice, prepares press releases for distribution in 
local media and trade publications, and has e-mailed state secretaries 
of agriculture to inform them about the program's benefits and 
requirements. 

The Farm Service Agency (FSA) announces certified petitions and 
publicizes the application process through notification letters sent to 
all known producers identified by the petitioner and FSA county 
offices, holds town hall meetings to discuss the program, and publishes 
information in multiple languages. 

USDA Has Certified and Denied About the Same Number of Petitions to 
Date: 

Out of 101 petitions submitted to date, 64 petitions from fiscal years 
2004-2006 were considered complete, appropriate, and timely, and were 
accepted for review: 

30 petitions were certified: 

* Half covered shrimp producers in multiple states. 

* Others generally covered niche commodities with small markets that do 
not receive benefits from other USDA programs, e.g., Concord grapes, 
lychees, and snapdragons. 

34 petitions were denied: 

* Half were up for recertification for a subsequent year. For example, 
in fiscal year 2006 all 8 shrimp petitions up for recertification were 
denied because they could not demonstrate a further increase in 
imports. 

* The remainder generally did not meet certain other program criteria. 

Certified Petitions, Fiscal Years 2004-2006: 



2004: 
catfish(multistate); 
Lychees(Florida); 
Salmon(Alaska); 
Salmon(Washington); 
Shrimp(Alabama); 
Shrimp(Arizona); 
Shrimp(Florida)[A]; 
Shrimp(Georgia); 
Shrimp(North Carolina); 
Shrimp(South Carolina); 
Shrimp(Texas); 
Wild Blueberries(Maine). 

2005: 
Concord grapes(PA, NY, OH); 
Fresh potatoes(Idaho); 
Lychees(Florida); 
Olives(California); 
Salmon(Alaska); 
Salmon(Washington); 
Shrimp(Alabama); 
Shrimp(Arizona); 
Shrimp(Georgia); 
Shrimp(Louisiana); 
Shrimp(Mississippi); 
Shrimp(North Carolina); 
Shrimp(South Carolina); 
Shrimp(Texas). 

2006: 
Avocados(Florida); 
Concord grapes(Michigan); 
Concord Grapes(Washington); 
Snapdragons(Indiana). 

[A] While the first petition submitted on behalf of Florida shrimp 
producers was denied, USDA certified a revised petition submitted in 
the same fiscal year. 

[End of table] 

Denied Petitions, Fiscal Years 2004-2006: 

2004: 

Alfalfa seed (regional); 
Catfish (Michigan); 
Crawfish (Louisiana); 
Garlic (California); 
Longans (Florida) 
Navel oranges (California); 
Olives (California); 
Prawns (Kentucky); 
Rice (national); 
Salmon (Oregon); 
Shrimp (Florida); 
Shrimp (Mississippi); 
York apples (Virginia). 

2005: 

Avocados (Florida); 
Cabbages (New York); 
Catfish (multistate); 
Seed potatoes (Washington); 
Shrimp (Florida); 
Wild blueberries (Maine). 

2006: 

Concord grapes (PA, OH, NY); 
Fresh potatoes (Idaho); 
Lychees (Florida); 
Olives (California); 
Potatoes (Washington); 
Salmon (Alaska); 
Salmon (Washington); 
Shrimp (Alabama); 
Shrimp (Arizona); 
Shrimp (Georgia); 
Shrimp (Louisiana); 
Shrimp (Mississippi); 
Shrimp (North Carolina); 
Shrimp (South Carolina); 
Shrimp (Texas). 

Petition Submissions Have Declined: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

Note: The number of certified and denied petitions do not sum to the 
total number of petitions submitted. Some submitted petitions are 
returned without further review if FAS determines that they are not 
complete, timely, or appropriate. 

[End of Figure] 

Many Petitions Were for Recertifications and None Were Approved in 
Fiscal Year 2006: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

[End of Figure] 

Program Criteria Have Limited Producer Certification, According to USDA 
Officials: 

Petition denials have increased over time because commodities often 
fail to meet the 20 percent price decline requirement, officials say. 

Recertification is difficult in part because a petition must show that 
the volume of imports has further increased and that the increase is 
contributing importantly to the decline in price. 

Objective 2: Benefits-Technical Assistance: 

Producers Received Technical Assistance Through Various Means: 

Over 13,000 producers have received technical assistance. 

USDA provides technical assistance in person, online or through 
training materials. For example: 

* About 230 workshops were provided to Alaska salmon producers in one 
year. 

* Catfish producers nationwide had access to online training workshops 
and referrals to other resources. 

USDA's Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service 
(CSREES) has implemented a basic (Phase One) and recently introduced an 
intensive (Phase Two) technical assistance curriculum. 

Phase One: Basic Technical Assistance Curriculum: 

Mandatory workshop for all certified producers who wish to apply for 
cash benefits, divided into four areas: 

* Overview-informs producers of program and other assistance available: 

* Where am I?-includes discussions on world trade situation and 
outlook, evaluating financial viability of the business, etc. 

* Where do I want to be?-includes discussions on production 
efficiencies, marketing opportunities, and alternative enterprises: 

* How do I get there?-includes brief discussion on resources available 
at Phase Two training: 

Phase Two: Intensive Technical Assistance Curriculum: 

Optional program available to producers since January 2006 that 
provides individual counseling to improve competitiveness and 
profitability, specifically addressing: 

* commodity assessment-provides advice on producing a higher quality 
product, reducing production costs, etc; 

* assistance analyzing business and options-provides resources for 
producers to develop a financial analysis of current business, new 
marketing plan, etc; and: 

* written technical assistance plan-includes financial projection of 
selected alternatives, business and marketing plan, and an 
implementation plan. 

Two-Thirds of Applicants Received Cash Payments in Fiscal Years 2004 
and 2005: 

Producers submitted nearly 12,000 applications for cash payments for 
fiscal years 2004 and 2005. 

USDA provided over 8,000 cash payments to producers. 

The median payment for 2004 was $1,605; for 2005, the median payment 
was $2,520. 

About 1,000 payments of the maximum of $10,000 were made, primarily to 
shrimp and salmon producers. 

About Half of Cash Payment Denials Were Attributed to the Net Income 
Test in FY 2005: 

USDA denied over 2,000 applications in fiscal year 2005[Footnote 9] 

* Over 1,000 of the applications were denied because producers could 
not document a decline in net income. 

* Other key reasons applications were denied: 

- Producers failed to participate in required technical assistance 
training, and: 

- Producers could not document that their average gross revenue was 
less than $2.5 million over the last 3 years. 

More Than Half of the Payments in Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005 Were 
$3,000 or Less: 

Payment distribution for TAA for Farmers program: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

[End of Figure] 

Salmon and Shrimp Producers Received Most Payments, in Fiscal Years 
2004 and 2005: 

Distribution of payments by commodity: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

[End of Figure] 

Salmon and Shrimp Producers Received 92 Percent of Payment Funds, FY 
2004 and 2005: 

Distribution of monies per commodity Payments for fiscal years 2004 and 
2005 totaled $28,056,454: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

Others includes: Olives, Lychees, Catfish, Concord grapes, Potatoes, 
and Blueberries: 

[End of figure] 

Lychee and Shrimp Producers Received Highest Average Payments, FY 2004 
and 2005: 

Average payment per commodity: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA data. 

[End of figure] 

USDA Officials Identified Factors that May Affect Individual 
Participation: 

Net farm income test limits cash payment eligibility: 

* To qualify for payment, unlike other USDA programs, producers must 
show that net farm income was less in the petition year than the 
previous year. 

* Officials say this criterion has disqualified producers who may have 
had negative net income 2 years in a row, but whose negative income in 
the second year was less than in the first. 

USDA officials told us that low payment rates may discourage some 
producers from participating: 

* Payment formula may result in low payments compared to producers' 
lost income from price declines (see app II). 

* For example, a grape producer who lost $74 per ton in the petition 
year would receive a benefit of $9.80 per ton. 

Low Participation and Payments Have Led to Low USDA Expenditures: 

USDA expenditures on technical assistance and cash payments each fiscal 
year are far below the $90 million annual appropriation for the TAA for 
Farmers program. Unexpended appropriations are returned to the 
Treasury. 

* 2004 cash payments: $13.6 million: 

* 2004 technical assistance: $1.1 million: 

* 2005 cash payments: $14.4 million: 

* 2005 technical assistance: $1.3 million: 

Few Producers Have Participated in Labor Training and Reemployment 
Services: 

Producers approved by USDA for a cash payment under TAA for Farmers are 
eligible for Department of Labor training and reemployment services. 

However, producers are not eligible for other Labor benefits, such as 
relocation allowances, the Health Coverage Tax Credit, or Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance, unless they qualify under Labor's TAA 
criteria. 

According to a 2006 survey, 3 percent or less of respondents in the 
majority of surveyed groups reported receiving training from Labor; 
although salmon and shrimp fishermen generally reported higher 
participation. 

Objective 3: Assessments: 

One Survey of the Program Has Been Conducted to Date: 

USDA's Western Center for Risk Management Education conducted a 2006 
survey through the Washington State University Extension to obtain the 
views of producers receiving benefits on an array of issues, including 
technical assistance, cash assistance, and Labor training: 

The survey included all producers who applied for benefits in fiscal 
years 2004 and 2005 and placed these producers in 16 groups: 

* shrimp producers in 8 states; 

* salmon producers in 2 states; 

* other 6 groups include producers of blueberries, catfish, Concord 
grapes, lychees, olives, and potatoes: 

Survey Limitations: 

The number of respondents for some of the groups was small, ranging 
from 902 for one group to as few as 16 for another group: 

* The number of lychee producers was very small, so we excluded this 
group from our analysis of the survey: 

* Of the 15 remaining groups, a total of 6,413 producers were surveyed 
(excluding lychee producers): 

* A total of 2,960 producers (excluding lychee producers) completed the 
survey: 

Response rates also were relatively low for some groups, ranging from 
as high as 82 percent for one group to as low as 48 percent for 
another: 

Despite these limitations, however, we feel that the data are of 
sufficient quality that we can provide general information on the 
survey results: 

Respondents Generally Satisfied with Quality of Technical Information 
Provided: 

Generally, 60 to 85 percent of respondents in a majority of the groups 
reported the technical information they received was at least somewhat 
adequate for most topics, such as: 

* how to improve the marketing of the producer's commodity and: 

* how to increase the value of the producer's crop. 

However, 20 to 40 percent of respondents in most groups found the 
technical information not adequate on some topics, such as: 

* how to evaluate other commodities that might be substitutions for 
their current commodity and: 

* how to identify a creative or innovative strategy for improving the 
producer's business. 

Most Found Technical Assistance Worthwhile, But Fewer Made Business 
Changes: 

Of the 15 groups of producers we used in our analysis: 

At least half of the respondents in most groups found the technical 
assistance mostly or very worthwhile, although 10 to 20 percent of 
respondents in most groups found it not worthwhile. 

Around a quarter of the respondents in all groups reported making 
changes to their business as a result of TAA technical assistance 
training, while roughly three-quarters reported they made no changes. 

For almost all groups, a quarter to half of the respondents were 
interested in more intensive business management assistance. 

Most Respondents Said Cash Payment Worth Effort to Apply, Despite Some 
Difficulties: 

In most groups, slightly more producers experienced some level of 
difficulty in applying for and receiving the cash payment than those 
who had no difficulty. 

Yet at least 80 percent of respondents in most groups who pursued the 
payment said the benefit was worth the effort they put forth to apply. 

However, since only producers who applied for benefits were included in 
the survey, findings do not provide insight into reasons other 
producers did not apply. 

Concluding Observations: 

TAA for Farmers is a new program just entering its third year, and we 
have only an early view of how this program is working. 

Current program structure appears to assist producers in adjusting to 
the effects of import competition on a limited, short-term basis. 
However, aspects of the program may limit participation. 

To date, the number of petitions certified and median cash payments 
remain low. As a result, USDA expenditures are well below the limits 
established in the legislation. 

[End of section] 

Appendix II: Cash Payment Formula: 

A cash payment is one of three benefits producers may receive through 
the TAA for Farmers program. Each eligible producer may receive a cash 
payment of up to $10,000 each federal fiscal year. 

The amount of money a producer receives is based on how much of the 
commodity he or she produced and how steeply the national price fell 
from the previous 5 marketing years.[Footnote 7] One program 
requirement is that the price declines at least 20 percent as a result 
of imports of a like or directly competing commodity. 

Specifically, payments are calculated on the basis of the following 
formula: 

Table 1: Adjustment Assistance Payment Formula: 

Total units of the commodity produced: # Units; 
Multiplied by (X): X; 
Half of the difference between 80 percent of the average national price 
of the commodity for the 5 previous years and the national average 
price for the most recent year: [(Ave. price for 5 years x 80%) - 
current price] divided by 2. 

Source: GAO analysis of adjustment assistance payment formula. 

[End of table] 

Table 2 gives some examples of how cash payments for several 
commodities may be calculated and how the payments compare to the price 
decline. 

Table 2: Examples of USDA Cash Payments: 

Commodity: Concord grapes; 
Total units produced: 100 tons; 
Multiplied by (X): X; 
Half of the difference in prices: [($272 x 80%) - $198] divided by 2; 
=: =; 
Total payment: $980.00; ($9.80 per ton); 
Price decline: $74.00 per ton. 

Commodity: Lychees; 
Total units produced: 10,000 pounds; 
Multiplied by (X): X; 
Half of the difference in prices: [($2.61 x 80%) --$0.98] divided by 2; 
=: =; 
Total payment: $5,540.00; ($0.554 per pound); 
Price decline: $1.63 per pound. 

Commodity: Alaska salmon; 
Total units produced: 95,000 pounds; 
Multiplied by (X): X; 
Half of the difference in prices: [($0.403 x 80% --$0.261)] divided by 
2; 
=: =; 
Total payment: $2,916.50; ($0.0307 per pound); 
Price decline: $0.142 per pound. 

Commodity: California olives; 
Total units produced: 100 tons; 
Multiplied by (X): X; 
Half of the difference in prices: [($598 x 80% --$432)] divided by 2; 
=: =; 
Total payment: $2,320.00; ($23.20 per ton); 
Price decline: $166.00 per ton. 

Source: GAO analysis of USDA payment rates. 

[End of table] 

[End of section] 

Appendix III: GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments: 

GAO Contact: 

Sigurd R. Nilsen (202) 512-7215, nilsens@gao.gov: 

Staff Acknowledgments: 

Dianne Blank, Assistant Director: 

Kate Blumenreich, Analyst-in-Charge: 

Guisseli Reyes-Turnell made significant contributions to the report in 
all aspects of the work. In addition, Amy Sweet served as team member; 
Wayne Sylvia served as technical advisor; David Dornisch advised on 
methodology issues; Rachael Valliere advised on report preparation; and 
Jessica Botsford advised on legal issues. Arthur Merriam verified our 
findings. 

[End of section] 

Related GAO Products: 

Trade Adjustment Assistance: Labor Should Take Action to Ensure 
Performance Data Are Complete, Accurate, and Accessible. GAO-06-496. 
Washington, D.C.: April 25, 2006. 

Trade Adjustment Assistance: Most Workers in Five Layoffs Received 
Services, but Better Outreach Needed on New Benefit. GAO-06-43. 
Washington, D.C.: January 31, 2006. 

Federal Programs with a Financial Eligibility Component. GAO-06-292R. 
Washington, D.C.: December 14, 2005. 

Health Coverage Tax Credit: Simplified and More Timely Enrollment 
Process Could Increase Participation. GAO-04-1029. Washington, D.C.: 
September 30, 2004. 

Trade Adjustment Assistance: Reforms Have Accelerated Training 
Enrollment, but Implementation Challenges Remain. GAO-04-1012. 
Washington, D.C.: September 22, 2004. 

FOOTNOTES 

[1] Producers include qualified fishermen or owners, operators, 
landlords, tenants, or sharecroppers who share in the risk of producing 
a commodity and are entitled to share in the crop available for 
marketing from the farm. 

[2] For recertified petitions, the term "previous year" is the year 
before the first petition was approved. 

[3] USDA's Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service 
(CSREES) operates the risk management education centers. 

[4] The estimate of participation in Labor's reemployment services is 
based upon the survey of TAA for Farmers participants conducted by 
Washington State University Extension for USDA's risk management 
education centers. Labor does not routinely track this information. 

[5] The survey collected information on all producers who applied for 
benefits in fiscal years 2004 and 2005, and analyzed the data using 
commodity-based groups. The estimate of 3-percent is based on 
respondents in the majority of groups who reported receiving training 
from Labor. Some commodity groups, for example, salmon and shrimp 
fishermen generally reported higher participation. 

[6] See appendix II for more information on the payment formula. 

[7] "Marketing year" means the marketing season or year as defined by 
the National Agriculture Statistic Service, or a [Footnote] specific 
period as proposed by the petitioners and certified by the 
Administrator of the Foreign Agricultural Service. 

[8] For petition recertification, producers must provide documentation 
that their net farm or fishing income was less than in the last year in 
which no adjustment assistance was received. 

[9] No information is available for cash payment applications denied 
during fiscal year 2004. 

[10] For petition recertification USDA uses the average of the 5 years 
in the original petition. For example, the Alaska salmon 2005 petition 
used the 5-year average of years 1997-2001. In addition, the "marketing 
year" means the marketing season or year as defined by the National 
Agriculture Statistic Service, or a specific period as proposed by the 
petitioners and certified by the Administrator of the Foreign 
Agricultural Service. 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site (www.gao.gov). Each weekday, GAO posts 
newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. 
To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, 
go to www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to Updates." 

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to: 

U.S. Government Accountability Office 441 G Street NW, Room LM 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To order by Phone: Voice: (202) 512-6000 TDD: (202) 512-2537 Fax: (202) 
512-6061: 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, JarmonG@gao.gov (202) 512-4400 U.S. 
Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Paul Anderson, Managing Director, AndersonP1@gao.gov (202) 512-4800 
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149 
Washington, D.C. 20548: