This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-03-1111 
entitled 'Coast Guard: New Communication System to Support Search and 
Rescue Faces Challenges' which was released on October 30, 2003.

This text file was formatted by the U.S. General Accounting Office 
(GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a 
longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately.

Report to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of 
Representatives:

September 2003:

COAST GUARD:

New Communication System to Support Search and Rescue Faces Challenges:

[Hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-1111] GAO-03-
1111:

GAO Highlights:

Highlights of GAO-03-1111, a report to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard 
and Maritime Transportation, Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure, House of Representatives

Why GAO Did This Study:

Search and rescue—one of the Coast Guard’s oldest missions—involves 
minimizing the loss of life, injury, and property damage by aiding 
people and boats in distress. The Coast Guard has previously reported 
that its 30-year-old search and rescue communication system, called 
the National Distress and Response System, has several deficiencies 
and is difficult to maintain. Thus, the Coast Guard contracted to 
replace and modernize it with a new system, called Rescue 21.

GAO was asked to identify the status and plans of the Coast Guard’s 
acquisition of Rescue 21 and the technical and program risks 
associated with Rescue 21.

What GAO Found:

Rescue 21’s original schedule, which called for it to achieve initial 
operating capability by September 2003, has been postponed, and the 
Coast Guard has not yet finalized a new schedule. This postponement 
was due in part to the development of the system taking longer than 
planned.

GAO reviewed the Coast Guard’s management of three risk areas 
associated with Rescue 21:

* Test management. Scheduled completion dates for key tests are still 
being determined. These key tests (formal qualification testing, 
system integration testing, and operational testing and evaluation) 
are incremental tests that the Coast Guard is planning to perform 
before reaching initial operating capability. Completion dates are 
not yet set because the Coast Guard decided to postpone initial 
operating capability due to delays in the original test schedule, 
which resulted in increased risks associated with compressing and 
overlapping key tests (see figure). In addition, key deliverables, 
including test plans, are still outstanding, and no scheduled 
completion dates exist.

* Requirements management. The Coast Guard has a process in place for 
managing system requirements.

* Risk management. The Coast Guard has a program in place for 
identifying, prioritizing, and minimizing risks. Two high risks 
identified by the Coast Guard are software development and 
environmental concerns related to the construction of new antenna 
sites, which may delay the implementation of Rescue 21.

What GAO Recommends:

GAO recommends, in part, that the Secretary of Homeland Security 
direct the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard to establish a new 
schedule for critical testing phases and initial operating capability 
and ensure that milestones are established for completing test plans 
for formal qualification testing, system integration testing, and 
operational testing and evaluation.

In commenting on a draft of our report, Coast Guard officials 
generally agreed with GAO’s findings and recommendations and provided 
technical corrections, which were incorporated as appropriate.

www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-1111.

To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click 
on the link above. For more information, contact David A. Powner at 
(202) 512-9286 or pownerd@gao.gov.

[End of section]

Contents:

Letter: 

Recommendations: 

Agency Comments: 

Appendix:

Appendix I: The Coast Guard's Rescue 21 Acquisition: An Update: 

Letter September 30, 2003:

The Honorable Frank A. LoBiondo 
Chairman 
The Honorable Bob Filner 
Ranking Minority Member 
Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
House of Representatives:

The National Distress and Response System is a significant component of 
the United States Coast Guard's search and rescue program. However, 
Coast Guard officials have reported that the 30-year-old system has 
several deficiencies and is difficult to maintain. In September 2002, 
the Coast Guard contracted with General Dynamics Decision Systems 
(General Dynamics) to modernize and replace the National Distress and 
Response System with a system called Rescue 21. As you requested, our 
objectives were to identify the (1) status and plans of the Coast 
Guard's acquisition of Rescue 21 and (2) technical and programmatic 
risks associated with Rescue 21.

To identify the status and plans for acquiring Rescue 21, we analyzed 
Rescue 21's acquisition strategy and cost and schedule estimates. We 
also compared original Rescue 21 plans with current strategies. To 
identify the technical and programmatic risks associated with Rescue 
21, we reviewed key Coast Guard acquisition documents, including test 
plans, requirements documents, the risk watch list, and risk mitigation 
plans. We performed our work at the Coast Guard headquarters in 
Washington, D.C.; the Coast Guard group site in Chincoteague, Va.; and 
General Dynamics in Scottsdale, Ariz. We conducted our work from 
November 2002 through June 2003 in accordance with generally accepted 
government auditing standards.

On August 13, 2003, we provided your offices with a status briefing on 
the results of this review, which is included as appendix I. The 
purpose of this letter is to provide the published briefing slides to 
you and to officially transmit our recommendations to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security.

In brief, we reported that the Coast Guard's original schedule for 
reaching initial operating capability by September 2003 had been 
postponed and that the Coast Guard had not yet finalized a new 
schedule. The postponement of the schedule for reaching initial 
operating capability was due in part to the system's development taking 
longer than planned. In reviewing the Coast Guard's test management 
practices, we found that the Coast Guard postponed key tests in part 
because prior schedules showed delay, overlap, and compression of 
tests, which increased the risk that all requirements would not be 
tested. In addition, schedules for key tests and deliverables, 
including test plans, were still outstanding. These key tests (formal 
qualification testing, system integration testing, and operational 
testing and evaluation) are incremental tests that the Coast Guard is 
planning to perform before reaching initial operating capability. We 
also determined that the Coast Guard has developed key documentation 
used for managing system requirements and that the Coast Guard has a 
program in place for identifying, prioritizing, and minimizing risks.

Recommendations:

To mitigate Rescue 21 risks and ensure that adequate testing occurs and 
all requirements are fulfilled so that the deployed system will work as 
specified, we are recommending that the Secretary of Homeland Security 
direct the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard to:

* establish a new schedule for critical testing phases and initial 
operating capability and:

* ensure that milestones are established for completing test plans for 
formal qualification testing, system integration testing, and 
operational testing and evaluation and that test plans address all 
requirements of the system.

Agency Comments:

In providing oral comments on a draft of this report, Coast Guard 
officials, including the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 Project Manager, 
stated that they generally agreed with our findings and 
recommendations. Coast Guard officials also stated that the Coast Guard 
is actively working with General Dynamics to jointly develop a new 
schedule that considers all the risk factors identified in this report. 
In addition, Coast Guard officials provided technical corrections that 
we incorporated in this report, where appropriate.

:

As we agreed with your staff, unless you publicly announce the contents 
of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution of it until 30 
days from the date of this letter. At that time, we will send copies to 
the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commandant of the United States 
Coast Guard, and other interested parties. Copies will be made 
available to others upon request. In addition, the report will be 
available at no charge on the GAO Web site at [Hyperlink, http://
www.gao.gov.] http://www.gao.gov.

If you have any questions about this report, please contact me at (202) 
512-9286 or by e-mail at [Hyperlink, pownerd@gao.gov] p [Hyperlink, 
pownerd@gao.gov] ownerd@gao.gov. Sophia Harrison, Richard Hung, David 
Noone, Colleen Phillips, Karl Seifert, and Eric Winter were major 
contributors to this report.

David A. Powner 

Director (Acting), Information Technology Management Issues:

Signed by David A. Powner: 

[End of section]

Appendixes:

[End of section]

Appendix I: The Coast Guard's Rescue 21 Acquisition: An Update:

[See PDF for image]

[End of figure]

[End of section]

(310443):