This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-11-686T 
entitled 'Recovery Act: Thousands of Recovery Act Contract and Grant 
Recipients Owe Hundreds of Millions in Federal Taxes' which was 
released on May 24, 2011. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as 
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. 
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data 
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, 
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes 
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, 
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format 
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an 
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your 
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or 
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
GAO: 

Testimony: 

Before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate: 

For Release on Delivery: 
Expected at 2:30 p.m. EDT:
Tuesday, May 24, 2011: 

Recovery Act: 

Thousands of Recovery Act Contract and Grant Recipients Owe Hundreds 
of Millions in Federal Taxes: 

Statement of Gregory D. Kutz, Director: 
Forensic Audits and Investigative Service: 

GAO-11-686T: 

Chairman Levin, Ranking Member Coburn, and Members of the Subcommittee: 

Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the results of our most 
recent report, which we are releasing today, on American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) contract and grant recipients 
that owe federal taxes.[Footnote 1],[Footnote 2] Collectively, 
individuals, businesses, and other entities owed the U.S. government 
about $330 billion in known unpaid taxes, including interest and 
penalties, as of September 30, 2010, according to the Internal Revenue 
Service (IRS). IRS enforcement of the nation's tax laws continues to 
be on our High-Risk List.[Footnote 3] The Recovery Act appropriated 
$275 billion to be distributed for federal contracts, grants, and 
loans.[Footnote 4] According to [hyperlink, http://www.Recovery.gov] 
(Recovery.gov) data on federal spending, as of March 25, 2011, about 
$191 billion of that amount had been paid out.[Footnote 5] As far back 
as 1992, we have said that Congress should consider whether tax 
compliance should be a prerequisite for receiving a federal contract. 
[Footnote 6] Federal law does not prohibit the awarding of contracts 
or grants to entities because they owe federal taxes and does not 
permit IRS to disclose taxpayer information, including unpaid 
federal taxes, to federal agencies unless the taxpayer consents. 
Because of the potential that some Recovery Act recipients also have 
unpaid federal taxes you asked us to investigate this issue. 

My statement today is based on our most recent report regarding tax 
delinquent federal contractors and grantees. Our report and my 
statement address two issues: (1) the magnitude of known tax debt owed 
by Recovery Act contract and grant recipients; and (2) examples of 
Recovery Act contract and grant recipients who have known unpaid 
federal taxes. To determine, to the extent possible, the magnitude of 
known tax debt owed by Recovery Act contract and grant recipients, we 
identified contract and grant recipients from Recovery.gov and 
compared them to known tax debts as of September 30, 2009, from IRS. 
[Footnote 7] To provide examples of Recovery Act recipients with known 
unpaid federal taxes, we chose a nonrepresentative selection of 30 
Recovery Act contract and grant recipients, which were then narrowed 
to 15 based on a number of factors, including the amount of taxes owed 
and the number of delinquent tax periods. These case studies serve to 
illustrate the sizable amounts of taxes owed by some organizations 
that received Recovery Act funding and cannot be generalized beyond 
the cases presented. Our work was performed in accordance with 
generally accepted government auditing standards and with standards 
for investigations prescribed by the Council of the Inspectors General 
on Integrity and Efficiency. 

My testimony today summarizes our findings on each of the two issues 
discussed in our report. Specifically, we found the following: 

* Thousands of Recovery Act contract and grant recipients owe hundreds 
of millions in federal taxes: At least 3,700 Recovery Act contract and 
grant recipients--including prime recipients, subrecipients, and 
vendors--are estimated to owe more than $750 million in known unpaid 
federal taxes as of September 30, 2009, and received over $24 billion 
in Recovery Act funds. This represented nearly 5 percent of the 
approximately 80,000 contractors and grant recipients in the data from 
Recovery.gov as of July 2010 that we reviewed. The estimated amount of 
known unpaid federal taxes is likely understated because IRS databases 
do not include amounts owed by recipients who have not filed tax 
returns or understated their taxable income and for which IRS has not 
assessed tax amounts due. In addition, our analysis does not include 
Recovery Act contract and grant recipients who are noncompliant with 
or not subject to Recovery Act reporting requirements. Our analysis 
also does not include contract and grant recipients that were not 
registered in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR).[Footnote 8] 
Because Recovery.gov does not contain taxpayer identification numbers 
(TIN), we used CCR to identify the TIN for each contract and grant 
recipient. We were not able to match about 17,000 of the 80,000 
recipients in Recovery.gov to the CCR database. As such, those 17,000 
recipients were not included in our analysis. 

* Examples of Recovery Act recipients with unpaid federal taxes 
engaged in abusive or potentially criminal activity: For the 15 cases 
we selected for further review, we found abusive or potentially 
criminal activity, i.e., recipients had failed to remit payroll taxes 
to IRS. Federal law requires employers to hold payroll tax money "in 
trust" before remitting it to IRS. Failure to remit payroll taxes can 
result in civil or criminal penalties under U.S. law. The amount of 
unpaid taxes associated with these case studies were about $40 
million, ranging from approximately $400,000 to over $9 million. IRS 
has taken collection or enforcement activities (e.g., filing of 
federal tax liens) against all 15 of these recipients. Our analysis 
and investigation found that only 1 of these 15 Recovery Act 
recipients was subject to the new Federal Acquisition Regulation 
requirement for certification of tax debts in relation to their 
Recovery Act awards.[Footnote 9] Because that contractor was current 
on its repayment agreement, the contractor was not required to 
disclose its tax debts. The other 14 recipients were grant recipients 
or contract subrecipients. However, 1 of the 14 companies that 
recently filed an Online Representations and Certifications 
Application improperly stated that the company had not been notified 
of any delinquent federal taxes (greater than $3,000) within the 
preceding 3 years. We did not identify any circumstances (e.g., 
current repayment agreement) that would allow the company to make such 
certification. We have referred all 15 recipients to IRS for further 
investigation, if warranted. Table 1 provides summary information on 3 
of our 15 case study examples of Recovery Act contractors and grant 
recipients with known unpaid federal taxes. 

Table 1: Examples of Recovery Act Contract and Grant Recipients with 
Known Unpaid Taxes: 

Nature of work: Construction; 
Total Recovery Act awards[A]: Over $1 million; 
Known unpaid federal taxes[B]: Over $700 thousand; 
Comments: 
* Company primarily owes payroll taxes from the mid 2000s. The company 
generally did not make any federal tax deposits during that time; 
* Company received multiple Recovery Act awards; 
* At the same time that the company was not paying its federal tax 
deposit, a company executive had hundreds of thousands of dollars in 
casino transactions; 
* According to IRS records, a company executive admitted to paying 
other creditors while neglecting to pay payroll taxes. IRS assessed a 
Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) against a key executive for failure 
to pay payroll taxes; 
* IRS established an installment agreement with the company to make 
monthly payments of over $1,000; 
* Federal government awarded the company millions of dollars in 
nonstimulus funds in the late 2000s; 
* IRS filed federal tax liens against this company. 

Nature of work: Social services; 
Total Recovery Act awards[A]: Over $1 million; 
Known unpaid federal taxes[B]: Over $2 million; 
Comments: 
* Nonprofit organization primarily owes payroll taxes from the mid to 
late 2000s. Nonprofit organization did not make any federal tax 
deposits for several periods; 
* On multiple occasions, the nonprofit organization defaulted on 
installment agreements with IRS. IRS records also indicated that the 
nonprofit organization may have submitted an offer in compromise to 
delay IRS collection efforts; 
* An executive was assessed a TFRP. IRS records indicated that this 
executive was responsible for numerous questionable business expenses. 
In addition, the executive had numerous transactions with casinos 
totaling hundreds of thousand of dollars each year. IRS records also 
indicated that IRS assessed a TFRP on this executive for another 
entity that went defunct; 
* IRS records indicated that the nonprofit organization failed to meet 
employee payroll obligations on numerous occasions in the late 2000s; 
* According to one executive, the nonprofit received millions of 
dollars in government grants; 
* IRS filed federal tax liens against this organization. 

Nature of work: Technical services; 
Total Recovery Act awards[A]: Over $100 thousand; 
Known unpaid federal taxes[B]: Over $4 million; 
Comments: 
* Company owes payroll taxes from the mid to late 2000s. For several 
periods, the company did not make any tax deposits. According to IRS 
records, the company claimed it did not make tax deposits because the 
government did not give the company an abatement on its taxes[C]; 
* IRS assessed a TFRP against a company executive, who owns real 
estate valued at an estimated $4 million. This executive also 
purchased a luxury vehicle at the same time the company was not paying 
its payroll taxes. The company executive reported hundreds of 
thousands of dollars in adjusted gross income in a recent tax return; 
* IRS established an installment agreement with the company to make 
monthly payments of tens of thousands of dollars. IRS records 
indicated that the company provided unique and essential services to 
the government; 
* Federal government awarded the company millions of dollars in 
nonstimulus funds in the late 2000s; 
* IRS filed federal tax liens against this company. 

Source: GAO's analysis of IRS and Recovery.gov records. 

Note: All dollar amounts are rounded. 

[A] Total Recovery Act awards are based on contractor and grantee 
recipient reports as of July 2010. 

[B] Rounded known unpaid tax amount as of September 30, 2009. Known 
unpaid tax amount does include penalty and interest. 

[C] Abatements are reductions in the amount of taxes owed and can 
occur for a variety of reasons, such as to correct errors made by IRS 
or taxpayers or to provide relief from interest and penalties. 

[End of table] 

Additional examples of Recovery Act contract and grant recipients with 
known unpaid taxes can be found in our report. 

Chairman Levin, Ranking Member Coburn, this completes my prepared 
statement. I would be happy to respond to any questions you or other 
Members of the Committee may have at this time. 

Contacts: 

For additional information about this testimony, please contact 
Gregory D. Kutz at (202) 512-6722 or kutzg@gao.gov. Contact points for 
our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found 
on the last page of this statement. 

[End of section] 

Footnotes: 

[1] GAO, Recovery Act: Thousands of Recovery Act Contract and Grant 
Recipients Owe Hundreds of Millions in Federal Taxes, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-485] (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 28, 
2011). 

[2] For the purposes of this report, we refer to prime recipients, 
subrecipients, and vendors as recipients of Recovery Act funds. 

[3] GAO, GAO's 2011 High-Risk Series: An Update, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-394T] (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 17, 
2011). 

[4] Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115 (Feb. 17, 2009). 

[5] Recovery.gov is a Web site created under the Recovery Act in order 
to track and publicly disclose the projects and activities for which 
Recovery Act funds were expended or obligated and information 
concerning the amount and use of funds by nonfederal recipients. It 
includes spending at the prime recipient level, as well as certain 
subrecipients. 

[6] GAO, Tax Administration: Federal Contractor Tax Delinquencies and 
Status of the 1992 Tax Return Filing Season, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO/T-GGD-92-23] (Washington, D.C.: Mar. 
17, 1992). 

[7] Specifically, we obtained all of the fourth quarterly contract and 
grant recipient reports made available on July 30, 2010, as well as 
all reports from prior quarterly submissions that were marked as 
"final" by the recipients. 

[8] CCR is the primary registrant database for the U.S. federal 
government. According to the Federal Acquisition Regulation 4.1102, 
prospective contractors shall be registered in the CCR database prior 
to award of a contract or agreement. Entities applying for grant 
awards from the federal government also need to register in CCR. All 
Recovery Act prime recipients were to register in the CCR database. 

[9] On May 22, 2008, the Civil Agency Acquisition Council and the 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council amended the FAR by adding 
conditions regarding delinquent federal taxes and the violation of 
federal criminal tax laws. The FAR rule requires offerors on federal 
contracts to certify whether or not they have, within a 3-year period 
preceding the offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment 
rendered against them for, among other things, violating federal 
criminal tax law, or been notified of any delinquent federal taxes 
greater than $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied. This 
certification is made through the Online Representations and 
Certifications Application Web site, orca.bpn.gov. 

[End of section] 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each 
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly 
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] 
and select "E-mail Updates." 

Order by Phone: 

The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO’s Web site, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm]. 

Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537. 

Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional 
information. 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: 
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4400: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7125: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4800: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7149: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: